BETWEEN:
Appellant
(Applicant)
and
SOLICITOR GENERAL
Respondent
(Respondent)
Heard at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 28, 2008.
Judgment delivered at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on February 28, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A.
Docket: A-121-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 79
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
SHARLOW J.A.
BETWEEN:
DANIEL BEDADA
(Applicant)
and
(Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
[1] Despite the able submissions of Mr. Matas, we have not been persuaded that Mr. Justice Phelan committed any reviewable error when he found that the claim had become moot by the time it was argued before him (2007 FC 121).
[2] Nor have we been persuaded that the Judge, having found that the case was moot, erred when in the exercise of his discretion, he decided to dismiss the application without deciding its merit.
[3] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-121-07
(APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED FEBRUARY 5, 2007, DOCKET NO. T-371-05)
STYLE OF CAUSE: DANIEL BEDADA v.
SOLICITOR GENERAL
PLACE OF HEARING: Winnipeg, MB
DATE OF HEARING: February 28, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Décary, Létourneau, Sharlow JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Décary, J.A.
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
David Matas, Barrister & Solicitor Winnipeg, MB
|
FOR THE APPELLANT |
Deputy Attorney General of Canada – Ottawa, ON |
FOR THE RESPONDENT |