Advanced Search

Luciano v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 1557 - 2019-12-04

The letters from Christine’s psychiatrist and therapist affirm that having her mother in the country would help her manage her depression, create a stable life for Zurie, and obtain a fair custody arrangement.   [...]  [48] The comparison between Christine—as someone with a low income who is dealing with mental illness, fighting for the custody of her child, and working full-time—with an individual who is criminally inadmissible to Canada not only borders on a repugnant and entirely inappropriate comparison between poverty and

Theaker v. Canada (Justice) - 2018 FC 662 - 2018-06-28

August 19, 2015, made pursuant to subsection 41(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act, RSC, 1985, c H-6 [CHRA], respecting a complaint she made to the CHRC. The CHRC allowed the Applicant’s complaint to proceed in part but limited it “to deal only with the [Applicant]’s allegations dating from November 2008 to August 2010”.   [...]  [23] The Applicant states the grounds for her motion as: “ongoing acts of sabotage by JT against the Canadian Federal Government and myself for his own personal gain by bribing the United States Government since 2011”; applicable laws governing cybercrime in Canada; rules of procedural fairness for self-represented persons;

Koppalapillai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 235 - 2018-03-02

[12] Although the Applicant raises several discrete issues, it is unnecessary to deal with these separately because the overarching issue, in my view, is whether the PRRA Officer’s decision was reasonable.   [...]  [13] It is well established that, absent any question of procedural fairness, the standard of review by which to assess a PRRA officer’s decision is that of reasonableness (see, e.g.: Paul v Canada (Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship), 2017 FC 687 at para 12, 282 ACWS (3d) 146; Khatibi v Canada (Citizenship and

Yuris v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 981 - 2017-11-01

[36] Indeed, while not directly dealing with the objective or purpose of paragraph 25(1.2)(b) of the IRPA, the legislative history of the enactment of which paragraph 25(1.2)(b) of the IRPA was a part, indicates that one of Parliament’s primary objectives was to reduce backlogs and abuses in the refugee determination   [...]  [38] I note that although the Interpretation Act, RSC 1985, c I-21 at section 12 provides that enactments “shall be given such fair, large and liberal construction and interpretation as best ensures the attainment of its objects”, that provision is qualified by the general principle of statutory interpretation that the

Southwind v. Canada - 2016 FC 1132 - 2016-10-11

Physical geography deals with the study of processes and patterns in the natural environment like the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and geosphere.   [...]  It submits that Ms. Larcombe in parts of her report relied “fairly extensively” on them.

Alani v. Canada (Prime Minister) - 2015 FC 649 - 2015-05-21

There is a fairly lengthy literature on the subject. Although there may be shades of difference among the constitutional lawyers, political scientists, and Judges who have contributed to that literature, the essential features of a convention may be set forth with some degree of confidence.   [...]  ... [A] declaration is a peculiarly apt instrument in dealing with bodies “invested with public responsibilities” because it can be assumed that they will, without coercion, comply with the law as stated by the courts.

Kagimbi v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2014 FC 400 - 2014-04-30

[32] In this regard, the adjudicator determined that “[his] role is not to decide whether the employer acted fairly toward Ms. Kagimbi in how it managed the alleged shortcomings in her work or whether the management practices of the correctional supervisors were appropriate”.   [...]  The jurisprudence shows that the statute is drafted such that the employer has a great deal of flexibility during the probation period, precisely so that it can evaluate the skills of a potential employee.

Wurm v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 97 - 2014-01-28

c) a indiqué par écrit à l’agent qu’il a l’intention de faire ou a fait un placement.   [...]  More particularly, the affidavit of Pantea Jafari deals mostly with the context of Canada’s immigration system and with the record of the former Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, but does not provide new evidence relevant to the processing of the applicant’s application.

Garcia Arreaga v Canada ( Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 977 - 2013-09-25

They also argued that, if she had to return to Guatemala, the female applicant would risk a great deal because of her political opinions.   [...]  Further, the RPD did not rule on the existence or the lack of a link between refugee claim and the grounds established under section 96 of the IRPA, unlike what procedural fairness dictates.

Precision Door & Gate Service Ltd. v. Precision Holdings of Brevard, Inc. - 2012 FC 496 - 2012-04-30

They are all dominated by the word “Precision” which is a fairly common noun, associated with exactitude and care.   [...]  (...) I am satisfied that confusion would be inevitable in this case given that the trade names are not merely similar but identical and deal with the same type of wares (...)

Montreal (City) v. Montreal Port Authority - 2011 FC 937 - 2011-07-27

[17] Regarding department properties, the PWGSC Policy establishes a procedure and lists criteria for the application and administration of LPS applications to ensure that they are processed in a fair, equitable and predictable manner.   [...]  This is a type of general insurance that while respecting the principle of tax immunity, allows the taxing authority to forecast spending and to budget, or even to borrow, based on the expected PILT income as if it were dealing with another business taxpayer.

Dezameau v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 559 - 2010-05-27

Additional evidence may be submitted on issues of procedural fairness and jurisdiction according to Ontario Assn. of Architects v. Assn. of Architectural Technologists of Ontario, [2003] 1 F.C. 331 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, refused.   [...]  Specialized medical facilities are required to deal with the trauma of rape.

Nagaratnam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 204 - 2010-02-23

[13] Whether the Officer erred by making a finding of credibility without convoking an in-person hearing is an issue of procedural fairness.   [...]  On these facts, Rule 167 was not triggered and there was no need to convene an interview to deal with a Decision that, essentially, is concerned with country condition documentation.