Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

Date: 20080410

Docket: T-151-05

Citation: 2008 FC 465

BETWEEN:

RODERICK EVAN BROWN

Appellant

and

 

CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY

Respondent

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

Charles E. Stinson

Assessment Officer

[1]               The Court dismissed with costs this application for judicial review to set aside a determination that the Applicant had not made a voluntary disclosure of his failure to remit GST. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the assessment of the Respondent’s bill of costs.

 

[2]               The Applicant did not file any materials in response to the Respondent’s materials. My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by having an assessment officer step away from a neutral position to act as the litigant’s advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the bill of costs and the supporting materials within those parameters. The total amount claimed is generally arguable as reasonable within the limits of the award of costs and is allowed as presented at $2,688.75.

 

 

“Charles E. Stinson”

Assessment Officer

 


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                          T-151-05

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          RODERICK EVAN BROWN v. CCRA

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

 

 

 

REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS:                    CHARLES E. STINSON

 

DATED:                                                                                 April 10, 2008

 

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS:

 

n/a

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Ms. Jade Boucher

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

n/a

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.