Date: 20250923
Docket: A-372-24
Citation: 2025 FCA 171
|
CORAM: |
GLEASON J.A. ROUSSEL J.A. WALKER J.A. |
|
BETWEEN: |
|
MICHAEL MOREAU |
|
Appellant |
|
and |
|
THUNDER BAY PORT AUTHORITY |
|
Respondent |
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 23, 2025.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 23, 2025.
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: |
WALKER J.A. |
Date: 20250923
Docket: A-372-24
Citation: 2025 FCA 171
|
CORAM: |
GLEASON J.A. ROUSSEL J.A. WALKER J.A. |
|
BETWEEN: |
|
MICHAEL MOREAU |
|
Appellant |
|
and |
|
THUNDER BAY PORT AUTHORITY |
|
Respondent |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 23, 2025).
WALKER J.A.
[1] The appellant, Mr. Moreau, appeals an order of the Federal Court dated November 7, 2024 (2024 FC 1783, per Fothergill J.), dismissing Mr. Moreau’s motion pursuant to Rule 97(b) of the Federal Courts Rules, S.O.R./98-106. The motion was brought in the course of an application by Mr. Moreau under section 77 of the Official Languages Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 31 (4th Supp) (OLA) in which he asserted that the respondent had breached section 91 of the OLA by determining that the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) position did not require a language profile or was English essential.
[2] In his motion, Mr. Moreau sought an order compelling the respondent’s affiant, the CEO, to answer a series of written questions on cross-examination of his affidavit about which position in the organization was responsible in emergencies.
[3] The affiant had already answered a question about his own responsibilities in emergencies. As the application concerned the language requirements for the affiant’s position, the unanswered questions were irrelevant, as the Federal Court found.
[4] While this is sufficient to dispose of this appeal, we would add that we see no error in the test applied by the Federal Court to determine the proper scope of a cross-examination in an application under the OLA, nor do we see any reviewable error in the Federal Court’s costs award.
[5] This appeal is therefore dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $1,500 plus disbursements.
"Elizabeth Walker"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
|
DOCKET: |
A-372-24 |
|
STYLE OF CAUSE: |
MICHAEL MOREAU v. THUNDER BAY PORT AUTHORITY |
|
PLACE OF HEARING: |
OTTAWA, ONTARIO |
|
DATE OF HEARING: |
September 23, 2025 |
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: |
GLEASON J.A. ROUSSEL J.A. WALKER J.A. |
|
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: |
WALKER J.A. |
APPEARANCES:
|
Michael Moreau |
FOR THE APPELLANT ON HIS OWN BEHALF |
|
Jordan Lester |
For The Respondent |
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Cheadles LLP Thunder Bay, Ontario |
For The Respondent |