Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20191114


Docket: A-76-19

Citation: 2019 FCA 284

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

RIVOALEN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

RONA INC.

Appellant

and

PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY

Respondent

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 14, 2019.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 14, 2019.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

 


Date: 20191114


Docket: A-76-19

Citation: 2019 FCA 284

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

RIVOALEN J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

RONA INC.

Appellant

and

PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 14, 2019).

NADON J.A.

[1]  Notwithstanding Mr. Kaylor’s strong arguments to the contrary, we have not been persuaded that there is any basis to intervene.

[2]  More particularly, we are satisfied that the Canadian International Trade Tribunal made no error in respect of its understanding and application of Rule 1 of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the Harmonized System set out in the schedule of the Customs Tariff, S.C. 1997, c. 36.

[3]  Accordingly, the appeal shall be dismissed with costs.

"M. Nadon"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-76-19

STYLE OF CAUSE:

RONA INC. v. PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

November 14, 2019

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

RENNIE J.A.

RIVOALEN J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Michael Kaylor

FOR THE APPELLANT

Ludovic Sirois

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Lapointe Rosenstein Marchand Mélançon, L.L.P.

Montréal, Quebec

 

FOR THE APPELLANT

Nathalie G. Drouin

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

For The Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.