BETWEEN:
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LINDEN J.A.
Docket: A-573-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 193
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
NADON J.A.
SEXTON J.A.
BETWEEN:
JONAS HAILE
Applicant
and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on May 27, 2008)
[1] We have not been persuaded that the Umpire made any error of fact or law that would warrant our intervention.
[2] This application will be dismissed.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-573-07
(AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW, UNDER SECTION 118 OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, FROM A DECISION OF THE UMPIRE, JUDGE R.J. MARINE, DATED AUGUST 29, 2007, IN FILE CUB 68694.)
STYLE OF CAUSE: JONAS HAILE v. THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF CANADA
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT BY: (LINDEN, NADON & SEXTON JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE APPLICANT (Self-Represented)
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
TORONTO, ONTARIO
|
FOR THE APPLICANT (Self-Represented)
|
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA TORONTO, ONTARIO |
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|