BETWEEN:
and
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
Assessment Officer
[1] The Court dismissed with costs this appeal of a decision of the Tax Court of Canada concerning the computation of the profit of a business. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the assessment of the Respondent's bill of costs. The Appellant's reply consisted of materials asserting that a prior agreement precludes his liability for costs.
[2] The materials advanced by the Appellant are irrelevant in the face of a finding by the Court under Rule 400(1), which I cannot disturb, that the Respondent is entitled to costs. Effectively, these circumstances are as if the Appellant had advanced no materials given the absence of any relevant representations which could have assisted me in identifying issues and making a decision. My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by having an assessment officer step away from a neutral position to act as the litigant's advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the bill of costs and the supporting materials within those parameters. The total amount claimed is generally arguable as reasonable within the limits of the award of costs and is allowed as presented at $2,236.74.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-266-06
STYLE OF CAUSE: SHARIF M. AKTARY v. HMQ
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES
REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: CHARLES E. STINSON
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS:
|
Mr. Sharif M. Aktary
|
FOR THE APPELLANT (self-represented)
|
|
Ms. Lisa M. Macdonell
|
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
n/a |
|
|
John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada |
|