Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20071003

Docket: A-227-05

Citation: 2007 FCA 316

 

CORAM:       NADON J.A.

                        SEXTON J.A.           

                        SHARLOW J.A.

 

 

 

                       

BETWEEN:

 

ANDREW CZARNOGORSKI

 

Appellant

and

 

SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND

MUSIC PUBLISHERS OF CANADA

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on October 3, 2007.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, on October 3, 2007.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                         SEXTON J.A.


Date: 20071003

Docket: A-227-05

Citation: 2007 FCA 316

 

CORAM:       NADON J.A.

                        SEXTON J.A.           

                        SHARLOW J.A.

 

                       

                                               

 

ANDREW CZARNOGORSKI

 

Appellant

and

 

SOCIETY OF COMPSERS, AUTHORS AND

 MUSIC PUBLISHERS OF CANADA

 

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on October 3, 2007)

 

SEXTON J.A.

[1]               We are not persuaded that the Trial Judge erred in his award of costs. The issue relating to the offer to settle was not brought to his attention prior to judgment nor did counsel for the Appellant ask the Trial Judge to reserve his decision on costs until after a determination of liability had been made, in order to allow for representations to be made on the subject of costs, after the main findings of the Trial Judge were known.

 

[2]               The order of the Trial Judge providing for no costs was not unreasonable having regard to the fact that (a) the Respondent was successful against the corporate defendant but unsuccessful against the Appellant, and that (b) both the corporate defendant and the Appellant were represented by the same counsel and (c) both defendants denied liability for the infringement thus putting the Respondent in the position of having to prove the infringement. It is also significant that the Appellant was the president of the corporate defendant and at all material times was the operator and manager of the business of the corporate defendant.

 

[3]               The appeal should therefore be dismissed with costs.

“J. Edgar Sexton”

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                                                  A-227-05

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                  ANDREW CZARNOGORSKI

                                                                                                                        Appellant

and

 

SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS, AND MUSIC PUBLISHERS CANADA

                                                                                                                        Respondent

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                            TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                              OCTOBER 3, 2007

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY:                                               (NADON, SEXTON, SHARLOW JJ.A.)

 

DELIVERED FROM

THE BENCH BY:                                                      SEXTON, J.A.

 

APPEARANCES:

 

RAY DI GREGORIO

FOR THE APPELLANT/

APPLICANT

KELLY GILL

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

CAMPORESE SULLIVAN DI GREGORIO HAMILTON, ON

FOR THE APPELLANT/

APPLICANT

 

GOWLINGS LLP,

TORONTO, ON

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.