Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20060817

Docket: A-201-06

Citation: 2006 FCA 280

 

Present:          RICHARD C.J.

                        EVANS J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

JACQUELINE ROBINSON

Appellant

(Responding Party)

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondents

(Moving Party)

 

 

 

Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.

 

Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 17, 2006.

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                                                                        EVANS J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                                               RICHARD C.J.

PELLETIER J.A.

 


Date: 20060817

Docket: A-201-06

Citation: 2006 FCA 280

 

Present:          RICHARD C.J.

                        EVANS J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

JACQUELINE ROBINSON

Appellant

(Responding Party)

 

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondents

(Moving Party)

 

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

EVANS J.A.

[1]               The facts of this case are not materially different from those in Jones v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FCA 279, a copy of which is appended to these reasons.

 

[2]               For the reasons that I gave in Jones, I would grant the motion brought under Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules by the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to dismiss the Jacqueline Robinson’s appeal as moot.

 

 

 

“John M. Evans”

J.A.

“I agree.

   J. Richard C.J.”

“I agree.

   J.D.Denis Pelletier J.A.”


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-201-06

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              Jacqueline Robinson v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

 

 

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                             Evans J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                         Richard C.J.

                                                                                                Pelletier J.A.

 

DATED:                                                                                 August 17, 2006

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

 

Benjamin A. Kranc

FOR  THE APPELLANT

 

John Provart

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Kranc & Associates

Toronto, Ontario

FOR  THE APPELLANTS

 

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.