Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

 

Date: 20060420

 

Docket: A-58-05

 

Citation: 2006 FCA 145

 

Between:

 

MAYA FORESTALES S.A.

 

Appellant

 

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

Respondent

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS

 

 

MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

 

 

[1]               This is the assessment of the respondent’s costs following the judgment dated January 26, 2006.

[2]               Considering the appellant specified in writing that it did not contest the assessment of the costs as submitted, the fees are set at $1,548 for items 19 (5 units), 22 (2 units x 2.75 hours), 25 (1 unit), and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B. I reduced the number of units requested for the assessment of the costs to 2, considering that it is a simple uncontested matter.

[3]               All the expenses incurred in this case, which were proven by affidavit, are allowed in the amount of $558.27.

[4]               Therefore, the respondent’s costs are assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,106.27. A certificate is issued for this amount.

 

 

Montréal, Quebec, April 20, 2006

 

 

“Michelle Lamy”

MICHELLE LAMY

ASSESSMENT OFFICER

 

 

 

Certified true translation

Michael Palles


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                             

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                            A-58-05

 

 

Between:                                               MAYA FORESTALES S.A. v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN 

 

 

WRITTEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

 

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec

 

REASONS BY: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

 

DATED:                                               April 20, 2006

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

 

Bélanger Sauvé                                                                       For the appellant

Trois-Rivières, Quebec

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.                                                                For the respondent

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                                      

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.