Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040622

Docket: A-145-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 245

CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A.

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                               AUDITOR GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                                            MICHELLE WALSH

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                          Heard at St.John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on June 22, 2004.

                 Judgment delivered at St.John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on June 22, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                   NADON J.A.


Date: 20040622

Docket: A-145-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 245

CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A.

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                               AUDITOR GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                                            MICHELLE WALSH

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

[1]                We are all agreed that this judicial review application should be allowed.

[2]                Both the Board of Referees and the Umpire, in reaching their respective conclusions, omitted to consider important portions of the evidence, namely, evidence emanating from the respondent to the effect that she had sought and obtained leave to concentrate on her studies and on the writing of exams scheduled at three-week intervals.


[3]                We are satisfied that this omission constitutes an error of law which justifies intervention on our part.

[4]                We are also of the view that the Umpire, like the Board, failed to ask himself whether, in any event, the respondent, having regard to all of the circumstances, had reasonable alternatives other than taking a leave of absence from her employment. The Board's failure to do so also constitutes a reviewable error.

[5]                Consequently, this judicial review application will be allowed, the Umpire's decision dated December 20, 2002 will be set aside and the matter will be referred back to the Chief Umpire or an Umpire designated by him for a rehearing and a redetermination. There shall be no order regarding costs.

                                                                                                                                         "M. Nadon"

                                                                                                                                                      J.A.


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                      A-145-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

v. MICHELLE WALSH

PLACE OF HEARING:                                St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

DATE OF HEARING:                                   June 22, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT:                                         (DESJARDINS, NADON, PELLETIER JJ.A.)

DELIVERED FROM THE

BENCH BY:                                                  NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Scott E. McCrossin                                 For the applicant

Ms. Michelle Walsh                                        For the respondent on her own behalf

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Morris Rosenberg                                   For the applicant

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ms. Michelle Walsh                                        For the respondent on her own behalf

Holyrood, NL


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.