Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010321

Docket: A-82-00

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                           MICHEL BÉRUBÉ

                                                                                                                                          Applicant

                                                                         AND

                                          ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                      Respondent

Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on Wednesday, March 21, 2001

Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec,

on Wednesday, March 21, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                       DÉCARY J.A.


Date: 20010321

Docket: A-82-00

Neutral Citation: 2001 FCA 81

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

LÉTOURNEAUJ.A.

NOËLJ.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                           MICHEL BÉRUBÉ

                                                                                                                                          Applicant

                                                                         AND

                                          ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                      Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec,

          on Wednesday, March 21, 2001)

DÉCARYJ.A.

[1]                 We were not satisfied that the Umpire had made any error that warranted the intervention of this Court. The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs.

                                                                                                                              "Robert Décary"                

                                                                                                                                                     J.A.                       

Certified true translation

Sophie Debbané, LLB


                                                FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                            

                         NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO.:                A-82-00

CORAM:         DÉCARY J.A.

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

STYLE OF CAUSE:

                                                            MICHEL BÉRUBÉ

                                                                                                                                           Applicant

                                                                         AND

                                           ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                      Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:          Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:            March 21, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY DÉCARY J.A.

DATED:                                    March 21, 2001

APPEARANCES:

François DeVette                                                                            FOR THE APPLICANT

Paul Deschênes                                                                              FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

François DeVette                                                                            FOR THE APPLICANT

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg                                                                            FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Date: 20010321

Docket: A-82-00

Between:

MICHEL BÉRUBÉ

Applicant

AND

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

line

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

line

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.