Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




     Date: 20000628

     Docket: A-23-98


BETWEEN:

     CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

     Applicant

     AND

     NATHALIE BEAUDET-FORTIN

     Respondent

     AND

     CANADA LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD

     Respondent

     AND

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Mis-en-cause


     TAXATION OF COSTS - REASONS


MICHELLE LAMY, TAXING OFFICER


[1]      This is a taxing of the bill of costs of the respondent Nathalie Beaudet-Fortin, pursuant to the judgment delivered by the Court of Appeal on November 26, 1999 dismissing the applicant's application for judicial review with costs. The taxation was held on June 7, 2000 with Claude Tardif, counsel for the respondent, present. The applicant was not represented, though it was duly served.

[2]      Following the submissions of Mr. Tardif, the respondent's fees are allowed as follows: item 19 (7 units), item 22(a) (2 hours x 3 units), item 25 (1 unit) and item 26 (2 units) for an amount of $1,600. The claim made under item 22(b) is disallowed, as the Court of Appeal's judgment nowhere mentions the fact that fees may be claimed for a second counsel. In the taxation as such, two units are allowed as the action was not opposed.

[3]      In light of the evidence presented at the taxation by Mr. Tardif regarding disbursements of some $1,320.27 for the cost, inter alia, of photocopies and preparation of the appeal memorandum, these are allowed as requested.

[4]      The bill of costs of the respondent Nathalie Beaudet-Fortin is accordingly taxed in the amount of $2,920.27 and a certificate issued for this amount.

     (signed)

     MICHELLE LAMY

     TAXING OFFICER

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

June 28, 2000


Certified true translation


Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a.




     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     APPEAL DIVISION

     Date: 20000628

     Docket: A-23-98

Between:


     CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL EMPLOYEES

     Applicant

     AND

     NATHALIE BEAUDET-FORTIN

     Respondent

     AND

     CANADA LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD

     Respondent

     AND

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Mis-en-cause








TAXATION OF COSTS - REASONS







     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     APPEAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE No.:                  A-23-98

BETWEEN:

     CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL EMPLOYEES,

     Applicant

     AND

     NATHALIE BEAUDET-FORTIN

     Respondent

     AND

     CANADA LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD

     Respondent

     AND

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Mis-en-cause


PLACE OF TAXATION:      Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF TAXATION:      June 7, 2000
REASONS BY:      M. LAMY, TAXING OFFICER
DATE OF REASONS:      June 28, 2000
APPEARANCES:      Claude Tardif for the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Trudel, Nadeau, Lesage, Larivière      for the applicant

Montréal, Quebec

Rivest, Schmidt      for the respondent

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.