Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040121

Docket: A-66-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 25

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                          WILTON INDUSTRIES CANADA LIMITED

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                           Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on January 21, 2004.

                   Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 21, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                               ROTHSTEIN J.A.


Date: 20040121

Docket: A-66-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 25

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                          WILTON INDUSTRIES CANADA LIMITED

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                     (Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on January 21, 2004)

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

[1]                 Despite the able argument of counsel for the appellant, having regard to the method of a reasonableness analysis set out in Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247, we have not been persuaded that the decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal is unreasonable.


[2]                 The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

                                                                                                                                      "Marshall Rothstein"       

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.            


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                                                     A-66-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          

WILTON INDUSTRIES CANADA LIMITED

v.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:                                   Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                                     January 21, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT:                                              (ROTHSTEIN, SEXTON and MALONE JJ.A.)

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH

BY:                                                                        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Peter Kirby

FOR THE APPELLANT

Mr. Jan Brongers

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin

Montréal, Quebec

FOR THE APPELLANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.