Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




Date: 20001103


Docket: A-625-99

CORAM:      ROTHSTEIN, J.A.,

         SEXTON, J.A.,

         EVANS, J.A.

BETWEEN:

     KATHLEEN HELEN WALKER

     Appellant

     - and -



     JOHN CHRISTOPHER RANDALL, and

     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Respondents

     - and -


     CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

     Intervener


     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

ROTHSTEIN, J.A.

[1]      We have carefully considered the appellant's arguments. The appellant has not persuaded us that, in investigating her complaint of sexual harassment, the Canadian Human Rights Commission or its officials failed to conduct a reasonably thorough investigation of the complaint in a procedurally fair manner. The Commissions's decision not to refer the complaint to a Tribunal and to dismiss it was not in error. Nor has the appellant persuaded us that Mr. Justice Teitelbaum erred in refusing to admit the appellant's affidavits and in dismissing her judicial review application.

[2]      The appeal will be dismissed with costs of $5,000.00 inclusive of disbursements payable to the respondent, the Attorney General of Canada.




                             (Sgd.) "Marshall Rothstein"

                                 J.A.

November 3, 2000

Vancouver, British Columbia






















Date: 20001103


Docket: A-625-99


CORAM:      ROTHSTEIN, J.A.,

         SEXTON, J.A.,

         EVANS, J.A.

BETWEEN:

     KATHLEEN HELEN WALKER

     Appellant

     - and -



     JOHN CHRISTOPHER RANDALL, and

     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Respondents

     - and -


     CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

     Intervener




Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 2, 2000

JUDGMENT delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia on November 3, 2000


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      ROTHSTEIN, J.A.





     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD




DOCKET:                  A-625-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:          Kathleen Helen Walker

                     v.

                     John Christopher Randall et al


PLACE OF HEARING:          Vancouver, British Columbia

DATE OF HEARING:          November 2, 2000

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY ROTHSTEIN, J.A.


CONCURRED IN BY:          Sexton, J.A.

                     Evans, J.A.


DATED:                  November 3, 2000


APPEARANCES:

Ms. Kathleen H. Walker          For the Appellant (on her own behalf)
Ms. Anne Turley              For the Respondents

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Kathleen H. Walker

Barrister & Solicitor

Vancouver, BC              For the Appellant (on her own behalf)

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney

General of Canada              For the Respondents
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.