Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040504

Docket: A-251-02

Citation: 2004 FCA 179

BETWEEN:

                                                                  SONIA DION

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                         THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                             

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                                             

                                            ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

FRANÇOIS PILON

Assessment Officer

[1]         This application for judicial review (and in 45 other related cases) was dismissed with costs on November 4, 2003. On January 30, 2004, Dominique Guimond, counsel for the respondent, filed a separate bill of costs with affidavit in support of each of the 46 cases, and asked that they be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties.

[2]         I will quote here paragraph 5 of the reasons for judgment of the Court, including instructions as to the costs to be awarded in all the cases:


The parties agreed at the hearing that the costs for the memorandum and the oral arguments would be determined on the basis of a single application, but that they would include the costs of preparing each of the other records.

[3]         As there were no written submissions by the applicants, all represented by William de Merchant, we will proceed with the assessment of the 46 bills of costs. These reasons will apply to all the cases, a list of which is attached.

[4]         Counsel for the respondent sought the maximum units for items 2, 13a, 14a and 26. I entirely agree. The large number of related cases fully justifies the higher level.

[5]         Each of the forty-six bills of costs contains disbursements for photocopying and bailiffs. Those disbursements were proven in the affidavits in support of each bill and will accordingly be awarded.

[6]         The respondent's costs both in this case and in the other forty-five related cases are assessed and allowed in the amounts appearing in the assessment certificates filed in each of those cases. Additionally, a copy of these reasons for assessment of costs will be entered in all the other cases to have the effect of an original.

                         "François Pilon"

                       Assessment Officer

Halifax, Nova Stocia

May 4, 2004

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, C Tr, LLL


APPLICANT

DECISION IMPUGNED

COURT No.

Sonia Dion

CUB 53724

CUB 53725

CUB 53726

CUB 53727

CUB 53728

CUB 53729

A-251-02

A-257-02

A-259-02

A-260-02

A-261-02

A-262-02

Claude Michel Daigle

CUB 53730

A-291-02

Lynn-Marie Martin

CUB 53731

CUB 53732

CUB 53733

A-288-02

A-287-02

A-290-02

Florin Mulstein

CUB 53734

CUB 53735

CUB 53736

A-284-02

A-282-02

A-286-02

Valeria Mulstein

CUB 53737

CUB 53738

CUB 53739

A-274-02

A-275-02

A-278-02

Mike Fiorillo

CUB 53740

CUB 53741

CUB 53743

CUB 53743

CUB 53744

A-289-02

A-293-02

A-301-02

A-304-02

A-305-02

Cristian Florescu

CUB 53746

CUB 53747

CUB 53748

CUB 53749

A-264-02

A-265-02

A-266-02

A-269-02

Normand Gougeon

CUB 53750

CUB 53751

A-298-02

A-300-02

Martin Chouinard

CUB 53753

CUB 53754

CUB 53755

CUB 53756

CUB 53757

CUB 53758

A-271-02

A-273-02

A-276-02

A-280-02

A-283-02

A-285-02

Émile Perreault

CUB 53761

A-296-02

Marie-Josée Camirand

CUB 53762

CUB 53764

A-252-02

A-254-02

Valérie Trépanier

CUB 53765

A-255-02

Annie Filioux

CUB 53766

CUB 53767

CUB 53768

A-256-02

A-263-02

A-258-02

Chantal Gougeon

CUB 53770

CUB 53771

CUB 53772

CUB 53773

CUB 53774

CUB 53775

A-281-02

A-268-02

A-279-02

A-277-02

A-272-02

A-270-02


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                                                                                                           

COURT FILE No.:                                                 A-251-02

BETWEEN:

                                                                  SONIA DION

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                         THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                             

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE

REASONS BY: François Pilon, Assessment Officer

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia

DATED: May 4, 2004

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Ouellet, Nadon, Barabé, Cyr, de Merchant, Bernstein,                                        for the applicant

Cousineau, Heap, Palardy, Gagnon, Tremblay

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg                                                                                              for the respondents

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.