Date:20000823
Docket:A-43-99
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
MCDONALD, J.A.
SHARLOW, J.A.
BETWEEN:
RENOLD KWAN WAH YEUNG
Appellant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, August 22, 2000
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,
on Tuesday, August 22, 2000
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. |
Date: 20000823
Docket: A-43-99
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
MCDONALD, J.A.
SHARLOW, J.A.
BETWEEN:
RENOLD KWAN WAH YEUNG
Appellant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario
on Tuesday, August 22, 2000)
ROTHSTEIN J.A.:
_. While we are not convinced that the certified question arises out of the facts of this case, the record is sufficiently ambiguous that we are not confident that the Visa Officer correctly applied the relevant regulations to this application. For this reason, the appeal will be allowed, the decision of Wetston J. and the decision of the Visa Officer will be quashed and the matter will be remitted to a different Visa Officer for redetermination. |
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
Toronto, Ontario
August 23, 2000
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
COURT NO: A-43-99 |
STYLE OF CAUSE: RENOLD KWAN WAH YEUNG |
Appellant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2000 |
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. |
Delivered at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, August 22, 2000
APPEARANCES BY: Mr. Cecil L. Rotenberg, Q.C. |
For the Appellant |
Ms. Claire LeRiche |
For the Respondent
SOLICITORS OF RECORD: CECIL L. ROTENBERG, Q.C. |
Barristers and Solicitors
255 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 808
Toronto, Ontario
M3B 3H9
For the Appellant |
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For the Respondent
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Date: 20000823
Docket: A-43-99
BETWEEN:
RENOLD KWAN WAH YEUNG
Appellant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT |