Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010316

Docket: A-578-96

                                                                                                                                                          

                                                                                                        Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 70

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                   GRANT WILSON

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                            

                                                                        - and -                                 

                                                                            

                                                                                                                                                          

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                            

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Friday, March 16, 2001

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,

on Friday, March 16, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                 MALONE J.A.


                                                                            

Date: 20010316

Docket: A-578-96

                                                                                                                                                          

                                                                                                        Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 70

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                   GRANT WILSON

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                            

                                                                        - and -                                 

                                                                            

                                                                                                                                                          

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                       (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

                                                       on Friday, March 16, 2001)

MALONE J.A.


Given the detailed credibility and factual findings of the learned Trial Judge we have not been persuaded that any reviewable errors exist in this appeal. In our view the Trial Judge correctly concluded that the Appellant did not met the burden of establishing that he had exercised the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in these circumstances.

On the facts, the Trial Judge correctly determined that the Appellant could not avail himself of the defence contemplated by subsection 227.1(3) of the Income Tax Act and, accordingly, properly dismissed the appeals in actions T-2518-89 and T-2522-89 with costs.

Counsel for the Appellant raised two arguments on this appeal that were not raised in the pleadings or in argument at trial. The Crown had no notice of these arguments and therefore, no opportunity to adduce evidence in answer to them. In these circumstances, we have concluded that we cannot consider these arguments at this stage because to do so would be unfairly prejudicial to the Crown.

We would dismiss this appeal with costs.

"B. Malone"


                                                                                                                                                     J.A.                              


                                                                                         FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                      Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                                                           A-578-96

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                            GRANT WILSON

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                            

- and -                          

                                                                            

                                                                            

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                           FRIDAY, MARCH 16, 2001

PLACE OF HEARING:                                      TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY:                           MALONE J.A.

Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Friday, March 16, 2001

APPEARANCES BY:                                       Mr. Thomas S. Kent

For the Appellant

Mr. John R. Shipley

                                                                             For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                        Thomas S. Kent

Fine & Deo

Barristers & Solicitors

3100 Steeles Avenue West, Suite 300

Vaughan, Ontario

L4K 3R1

For the Appellant

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Date: 20010316

Docket: A-578-96

BETWEEN:

GRANT WILSON

                                                                                                                                          Appellant

                                                                            

- and -                          

                                                                            

                                                                                                                                                          

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                           

                                                                                         

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT

                                                                          

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.