Date:20000612
Docket:A-186-99
CORAM: DÉCARY, J.A.
SEXTON, J.A.
EVANS, J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE BODY SHOP INTERNATIONAL PLC
Appellant
- and -
IMASCO RETAIL INC./LA SOCIETE DE DETAIL IMASCO INC.
and SHOPPERS DRUG MART LIMITED
Respondents
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Monday, June 12, 2000
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario
on Monday, June 12, 2000
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DÉCARY, J.A. |
Date: 20000612
Docket: A-186-99
CORAM: DÉCARY, J.A.
SEXTON, J.A.
EVANS, J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE BODY SHOP INTERNATIONAL PLC
Appellant
- and -
IMASCO RETAIL INC./LA SOCIETE DE DETAIL IMASCO INC.
and SHOPPERS DRUG MART LIMITED
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario
on Monday, June 12, 2000)
DÉCARY J.A.
| _. We have not been persuaded that Mr. Justice Cullen erred in the exercise of his discretion when he did not allow the questions at issue to be put to the witness during the examination for discovery. |
| _. The appeal will be dismissed with costs. |
"Robert Décary"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
| DOCKET: A-186-99 |
| STYLE OF CAUSE: THE BODY SHOP INTERNATIONAL PLC |
- and -
IMASCO RETAIL INC./LA SOCIETE DE
DETAIL IMASCO INC. and SHOPPERS DRUG
MART LIMITED
DATE OF HEARING: MONDAY, JUNE 12, 2000
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DÉCARY J.A. |
Delivered at Toronto, Ontario on
Monday, June 12, 2000
APPEARANCES BY: Mr. Christopher J. Kvas
Ms. Nancy A. Miller
| For the Appellant |
Mr. Thomas R. Kelly
| For the Respondents |
| SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Kvas Miller Everitt |
| Barrister & Solicitor |
| 77 Bloor Street West, Suite 1502 |
| Toronto, Ontario |
| M5S 1M2 |
| For the Appellant |
| Mr. Thomas R. Kelly |
Smart & Biggar
900-55 Metcalfe Street
P.O. Box 2999, Station "D"
Otawa, Ontario
K1P 5Y6
| For the Respondents |
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Date: 20000612
Docket: A-186-99
BETWEEN:
| THE BODY SHOP INTERNATIONAL PLC |
Appellant
- and -
IMASCO RETAIL INC./LA SOCIETE DE
DETAIL IMASCO INC. and SHOPPERS DRUG
MART LIMITED
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT