Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20041115

Docket: A-21-04

Citation: 2004 FCA 383

Québec, Quebec, November 15, 2004

CORAM:        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                        JEAN-MICHEL TESSIER

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                           and

                                               CANADA PORTS CORPORATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                  Hearing held at Québec, Quebec on November 15, 2004.

                  Judgment delivered from the bench at Québec, Quebec on November 15, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:                                              LÉTOURNEAU J.A.


Date: 20041115

Docket: A-21-04

Citation: 2004 FCA 383

Québec, Quebec, November 15, 2004

CORAM:        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                        JEAN-MICHEL TESSIER

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                           and

                                               CANADA PORTS CORPORATION

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                    (Delivered from the bench at Québec, Quebec on November 15, 2004)

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

[1]         We consider that this appeal cannot succeed regardless of the classification of the payment of $366,243.12 made in favour of the appellant to buy back years of service, as that payment was not authorized.


[2]        If it was remuneration, the payment had to be authorized by the Privy Council as indicated in the following resolution of the respondent's board of directors, dated March 22, 1995, and this was not the case:

On a motion duly made and adopted, it was

RESOLVED THAT

The Acting Chairman be authorized to pursue the overall compensation of the Canada Ports Corporation President and Chief Executive Officer and make appropriate recommendations for subsequent approval by Privy Council Office.

[3]        Furthermore, if the payment was a benefit rather than remuneration, it had to be authorized by the respondent's board of directors under subsection 108(2) of the Financial Administration Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-11 (the Act):

Remuneration

108. (1) The rate of any remuneration paid to a director, chairman or chief executive officer of a parent Crown corporation for his services in respect of that office and, in the case of a chairman or chief executive officer, any other office of the corporation or an affiliate thereof shall be fixed by the Governor in Council.

Rémunération

108. (1) Le barème de rémunération des administrateurs, du président et du premier dirigeant d'une société d'État mère, au titre de ces fonctions et, dans le cas du président ou du premier dirigeant, d'autres fonctions auprès de la société ou d'une personne morale du même groupe, est fixé par le gouvernement en conseil.

Other benefits

(2) Any benefits, other than remuneration, provided to a director, chairman or chief executive officer of a parent Crown corporation for his services in respect of that office and, in the case of a chairman or chief executive officer, any other office of the corporation or an affiliate thereof shall be fixed by the board of directors of the corporation in accordance with the regulations.

[Emphasis added.]

Autres avantages

(2) Les autres avantages que reçoivent les administrateurs, le président et le premier dirigeant d'une société d'État mère, au titre de ces fonctions, et, dans le cas du président ou du premier dirigeant, d'autres fonctions auprès de la société ou d'une personne morale du même groupe, sont fixés par le conseil d'adminis-tration de la société en conformité avec les règlements.


No resolution to this effect was entered in evidence.

[4]        Moreover, the payment authorization issued by the acting chairperson on May 31, 1995, clearly exceeds the mandate conferred by the above-cited resolution of the board of directors, which was to examine the issue of buying back years of service and make a recommendation to the Privy Council.

[5]        Finally, we see no merit in the appellant's argument that the lack of a payment authorization is not enforceable against him, since he was not a third party within the meaning of section 102 of the Act, and in any case he knew or should have known of the statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to such a payment.

[6]        For these reasons, the appeal shall be dismissed with costs.

"Gilles Létourneau"

                                  J.A.

Certified true translation

Kelley Harvey, BCL, LLB


                          FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                                         A-21-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                         JEAN-MICHEL TESSIER v. CANADA PORTS CORPORATION

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                   QUÉBEC, QUEBEC

DATE OF HEARING:                                                     NOVEMBER 15, 2004

CORAM:                                                                          LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

NADON J.A.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT                                       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

OF THE COURT BY:

DATE OF REASONS:                                                     NOVEMBER 15, 2004

APPEARANCES:

Louis Masson/André Joli-Coeur                                          FOR THE APPELLANT

Patrick Vézina/Bernard Letarte                                            FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Joli-Coeur, Lacasse, Geoffrion, Jetté, Saint-Pierre                FOR THE APPELLANT

Québec, Quebec

Department of Justice Canada                                              FOR THE RESPONDENT

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.