Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040311

Docket: A-199-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 105

CORAM:        SEXTON J.A.

EVANS J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                              JOSEPH HUTCHISON

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                             Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004.

                     Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                         EVANS J.A.


Date: 20040311

Docket: A-199-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 105

CORAM:        SEXTON J.A.

EVANS J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                              JOSEPH HUTCHISON

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                       (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 11, 2004)

EVANS J.A.

[1]                 We are all of the view that this application for judicial review must be dismissed.


[2]                 The Attorney General argues that the Pension Appeals Board erred in law in concluding that Mr. Hutchison's minimum qualifying period ended on December 31, 1992, rather than on December 31, 1994. Even if he is right on this, we are not persuaded that the error is material and warrants the intervention of this Court. The record reveals that Mr. Hutchison has continually complained of lower back pain since he suffered injuries at work in the mid and late 1980s, and has regularly consulted doctors about his back.

[3]                 Nor are we satisfied that, on the basis of the evidence before it, the Board's decision that Mr. Hutchison was suffering from a severe and prolonged disability was patently unreasonable or, in the words of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, paragraph 18.1(4)(d), was made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard to the material before it.

[4]                 For these reasons, the application will be dismissed with costs.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.                       


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                                   

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                                        A-199-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. JOSEPH HUTCHISON

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                TORONTO , ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                                                 MARCH 11, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:

(SEXTON, EVANS AND SHARLOW JJ.A.)

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY EVANS J.A.

APPEARANCES:

           

Stuart Herbert                                                                  FOR THE APPLICANT

Steven Yormak                                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                                FOR THE APPLICANT

Yormak & Yormak

Barristers & Solicitors

London, ON                                                                      FOR THE RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.