Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040901

Docket: A-605-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 280

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARY J.A.

EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                    THE MINISTER OF HEALTH

                                     and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                          Appellants

                                                                           and

                                                                  APOTEX INC.

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                        Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 1, 2004.

                  Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 1, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                     EVANS J.A.


Date: 20040901

Docket: A-605-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 280

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

DÉCARY J.A.

EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                    THE MINISTER OF HEALTH

                                     and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                          Appellants

                                                                           and

                                                                  APOTEX INC.

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                    (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 1, 2004)

EVANS J.A.


[1]                This is an appeal from an order of Lemieux J. of the Federal Court, dated December 17, 2003 (2003 FC 1480), dismissing an appeal from an order of Lafrenière P., dated June 17, 2003. The Prothonotary had ordered the disclosure of communications between the Minister and her legal advisors: he held that the Minister had impliedly waived legal privilege for these communications by relying in her statement of defence on the fact that she had consulted with her lawyers in order to demonstrate the reasonableness of the delay in issuing an NOC to Apotex. As an alternative to disclosure of the communications, the Prothonotary invited the Minister to undertake not to rely on the fact of the consultations in its defence to Apotex' action.

[2]                We are not persuaded that Lemieux J. committed any reversible error to declining to interfere with the Prothonotary's order. In his reasons for decision, Lemieux J. said (at paragraph 44):

In the circumstances of this case, by relying on the fact of taking legal advice necessarily puts in issue the communications between the Minister's officials and her legal advisors in such a way that it would be unfair to shield those communications from disclosure.

[3]                For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

                                                                                   "John M. Evans"              

                                                                                                      J.A.                   


                          FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

    NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           A-605-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                 THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and THE ATTORNEY OF CANADA v. APOTEX INC.

APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED DECEMBER 17, 2004, FILE NO. T-1118-00

PLACE OF HEARING:                     OTTAWA, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                       SEPTEMBER 1, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY:                      EVANS J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Marie Crowley                                           FOR THE APPELLANTS

Mr. Nando De Luca                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada                        FOR THE APPELLANTS

Goodmans LLP                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

Toronto, Ontario


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.