1,035 result(s)
-
826.
Nwaeme v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 705 - 2017-07-24
Federal Court Decisions[4] On March 6, 2015, the Applicant submitted an application for permanent residence on H&C grounds [first H&C application]. [...] du Canada - sauf s’il est interdit de territoire au titre des articles 34, 35 ou 37 - qui demande un visa de résident permanent, étudier le cas de cet étranger; il peut lui octroyer le statut de résident permanent ou lever tout ou partie des critères et obligations applicables, s’il estime que des considérations d’ordre [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5128-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
827.
Joseph v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 904 - 2015-07-24
Federal Court Decisions[3] The Applicants applied for permanent residency on the basis of H&C grounds on December 6, 2012. [...] The Officer found they had not established themselves to a degree that would result in an unusual and undeserved or disproportionate hardship if they had to apply for permanent residence from outside Canada. [...] [31] The Applicants further allege they could not apply for permanent residence from outside Canada because they would not be admitted in Canada.
-
828.
Safajou v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship) - 2018 FC 254 - 2018-03-06
Federal Court Decisions[3] Mr. Safajou became a permanent resident of Canada in 2003 under the skilled worker category. [...] In 2014, Mr. Safajou applied to renew his permanent residency card, which was approved in early 2015. [...] However, the Ankara visa office then made a negative determination with respect to his permanent resident status when he applied for a travel document.
-
829.
Millette v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 542 - 2012-05-04
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicant does not have the required occupational experience and education to seek immigration in the Skilled Worker Category, nor does she have the assets to qualify for the Entrepreneur and Investors Class. [...] This application is the last opportunity for the Applicant to seek Permanent Residence in Canada. [...] Applications for Permanent Residence as a general rule are made from outside Canada.
-
830.
Mered v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2006 FC 454 - 2006-04-07
Federal Court Decisions[8] Mr. Rafik Mered was granted refugee status in Canada in 2001, and Samia Mered and her brother Mr. Karim Mered applied for permanent resident visas in the skilled worker category. [...] b) pour devenir un résident temporaire, qu’il détient les visa ou autres documents requis par règlement et aura quitté le Canada à la fin de la période de séjour autorisée. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5289-05 STYLE OF CAUSE: MOHAMED MERED
-
831.
Liang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2006 FC 967 - 2006-08-11
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Liang is a citizen of China who applied for permanent residence in Canada and requested that his case be assessed on humanitarian and compassionate grounds because he is the last remaining member of his family in China. [...] · Mr. Liang had not provided proof that adequate funds for resettlement were available to him, therefore his application as a member of the federal skilled worker class could not be processed under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (Act). [...] FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5659-05
-
832.
Fouda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 403 - 2023-03-23
Federal Court Decisions[3] Sara and her family previously had permanent resident status in Canada. [...] [4] Haitham had applied for permanent residence as a skilled worker in 2004. [...] The family travelled to Canada in July 2008 and landed as permanent residents.
-
833.
Diamantopoulou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 1272 - 2021-11-22
Federal Court Decisions[18] To meet this test, it is not sufficient to simply establish the existence or likely existence of misfortunes, relative to Canadian citizens and permanent residents of Canada. [...] This is simply another way of saying that applicants for such relief must demonstrate the existence of misfortunes or other circumstances that are exceptional, relative to other applicants who apply for permanent residence from within Canada or abroad: Jesuthasan, v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 142, at [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5151-20 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
834.
Barud v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 1441 - 2019-11-15
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the Convention refugee abroad class and the humanitarian protected persons abroad class. [...] [15] The Respondent argued that the facts of this case are strikingly similar to those in Garcia Porfirio v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 794, in which the applicant had admitted that he had been untruthful about how he had learned about the job opportunity for which he was seeking a skilled worker permit. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: imm-1456-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
835.
Oyerinde v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 53 - 2016-01-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review pursuant to section 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA or the Act] of a decision by an immigration officer [the Officer] from the High Commission of Canada in the United Kingdom finding the Applicant inadmissible for permanent residence on [...] He applied for permanent residence in Canada under the skilled worker scheme. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-7309-14 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
836.
Su v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2022 FC 366 - 2022-03-17
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by a Senior Immigration Officer [Officer], dated January 7, 2021, refusing the Applicants’ application for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds. [...] The Applicants applied for permanent residence on H&C grounds on October 22, 2019. [...] [5] Regarding establishment, the Officer acknowledged the spouse’s efforts in trying to improve her language skills but noted both adult Applicants state they are unable to communicate in either English or French and accordingly found their efforts in trying to improve their language skills to be minimal.
-
837.
Anandappa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 701 - 2002-06-20
Federal Court Decisions[9] I add the applicant on or about July 2001 applied through the Canadian Embassy in Buffalo for permanent residency in Canada in the independent category band as a skilled worker- a Chef. [...] One factor in that prioritization may be the applicant's outstanding application for permanent residence in Canada, and how imminent the visa officer's decision is forthcoming. [...] FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Date: 20020620 Docket: IMM-2464-02 BETWEEN:
-
838.
Avanesyan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2001 FCT 663 - 2001-06-15
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review under section 82.1(2) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-2, of the decision of the visa officer, Marie Desbois, dated March 20, 2000, denying the applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [3] The applicant, Samvel Avanesyan is a citizen of Russia who submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada to the Canadian Embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina on July 19, 1999. [...] [20] Although the applicant submitted his application for permanent residence eight months before the interview, he had not researched the employment market in Canada and had little idea of how he would find a job.
-
839.
Raveshi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2024 FC 15 - 2024-01-04
Federal Court Decisions(a) would create or maintain significant social, cultural or economic benefits or opportunities for Canadian citizens or permanent residents; [...] a) il permet de créer ou de conserver des débouchés ou des avantages sociaux, culturels ou économiques pour les citoyens canadiens ou les résidents permanents; [...] • When transferring a specialized knowledge worker, the company must
-
840.
Hui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 1098 - 2011-09-26
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review by Wang Jing Hui challenging a decision by a Visa Officer at the Canadian Embassy in Beijing, China denying his application for a permanent resident visa. [...] [2] Mr. Hui was an approved nominee under the Saskatchewan Immigrant Nominee Program as a member of the skilled-worker class. [...] On December 17, 2008, he applied for a permanent resident visa through the Canadian Embassy in Beijing.
-
841.
Harkat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2020 FC 662 - 2020-06-03
Federal Court Decisionscertificate to the Federal Court of Canada pursuant to subsection 77(1) of the IRPA; [...] advocate pursuant to section 87.1 of the IRPA. Once appointed, the special advocate’s role is to protect the interests of the permanent resident or foreign national in proceedings during which information or evidence is heard in the absence of the public, the permanent resident or foreign national and their counsel. [...] The special advocate may also challenge the relevance, reliability and sufficiency of the information or other evidence provided and not disclosed to the permanent resident or foreign national and their counsel, and the weight to be given to it.
-
842.
Menon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 1273 - 2005-09-16
Federal Court Decisions[3] The Applicants applied for permanent resident status in Canada on the 11th of March, 2002. [...] 40. (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation [...] Permanent residence applicants and some visitors may need extra time to address any concerns. ...
-
843.
Ji v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2022 FC 1210 - 2022-08-18
Federal Court DecisionsThere, applicants for permanent residence incorrectly answered “No” to a question about whether they had been refused a visitor visa. [...] In that case, Ms. Liu had made a misrepresentation on an application for permanent residence under the Canadian Experience Class [CEC]. [...] That application was rejected for other reasons, but Ms. Liu made a second, successful, spousal application for permanent residence: Liu at para 1.
-
844.
Douglas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 703 - 2017-07-24
Federal Court Decisions[3] On February 12, 2013, the Applicant filed an application for permanent residence under the Spousal Class. [...] The Officer accepted that the Applicant would not be eligible for the Federal Skilled Worker / Express Entry category and would likely not qualify under a provincial nominee program. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4413-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
845.
Karimi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 411 - 2023-03-24
Federal Court Decisions[7] In August 2021, the Applicants applied for permanent residence under the Start-Up Business Class. [...] (https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/operational-bulletins-manuals/temporary-residents/foreign-workers/provincial-nominees-permanent-resident-applicants/work-permits-start-business-class-permanent-resident-visa-applicants.html) [...] (b) would create or maintain reciprocal employment of Canadian citizens or permanent residents of Canada in other countries;
-
846.
Santos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 1332 - 2019-10-25
Federal Court Decisions[1] Gloria Santos seeks judicial review of the refusal by an immigration officer [Officer] to grant her request to apply for permanent residence from within Canada on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds. [...] [17] A decision of an immigration officer to grant or refuse a request to apply for permanent residence from within Canada on H&C grounds is subject to review by this Court against the standard of reasonableness (Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 at para 44 [Kanthasamy]). [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: IMM-4603-18 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
847.
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Lotfi - 2012 FC 1089 - 2012-09-18
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20120918 Docket: IMM-5930-11 [...] He applied for a permanent resident visa to enter Canada as a skilled worker. [...] In applying for permanent resident status, the Respondent had to address his prospects for establishment in Canada.
-
848.
Do v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2022 FC 927 - 2022-06-20
Federal Court Decisions[8] In November 2018, Nova Scotia confirmed Ms. Do’s nomination for its PNP as a skilled worker and supported her application for a temporary work permit. [...] [11] In June 2020, a visa officer in Singapore reviewed the permanent residence application. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4002-21 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
849.
Bagatnan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 1188 - 2021-11-05
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant, Ms. Qunelyn Allada Bagatnan, sought permanent residence from within Canada based on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) considerations. [...] Also in December 2020, Ms. Bagatnan filed an H&C application for permanent residence. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1141-21 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
850.
Moussa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 515 - 2008-04-21
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review brought by the Applicant, Mohamed Ibrahim Youssef Moussa, challenging the February 1, 2007 decision by a Visa Officer (the “Officer”), denying his application for permanent residence. [...] [2] In June 2000, the Applicant submitted an application for permanent residence to the Canadian High Commission in London, England. [...] He was seeking to come to Canada from Saudi Arabia as a member of the Skilled Worker Class, specifically as a Civil Engineer.