1,035 result(s)
-
751.
Cortez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 800 - 2016-07-13
Federal Court DecisionsOn January 15, 2000, he applied for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] [4] The Applicant was granted permanent residence status and entered Canada on April 4, 2005. [...] ... (d) subject to subsection (10), the sponsor previously made an application for permanent residence and became a permanent resident and, at the time of that application, the foreign national was a non-accompanying family member of the sponsor and was not examined.
-
752.
Perez Pena v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2020 FC 796 - 2020-07-28
Federal Court DecisionsApplicant seems to have worked only a few months and has not had a permanent job since 2016. [...] [16] Finally, the fact that other Colombian workers who were selected by his employer in Canada have been granted work permits is irrelevant since the situation of these other workers is unknown. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3782-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
753.
Hila v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 1425 - 2005-10-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicants are seeking a judicial review of their application for permanent residence from within Canada on Humanitarian and Compassionate ("H & C") grounds; it was denied on January 20, 2005. [...] The Immigration Officer also determined that the Applicants and their daughters would not suffer undue, disproportionate, or undeserved hardship if they were required to make their application for permanent residence from outside of Canada. [...] The Immigration Officer determined that Mr. Hila could come to Canada as a skilled worker from Albania and that he could continue his trade in Albania.
-
754.
Perelmuter v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1188 - 2002-11-15
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the visa officer at the High Commission in London, England, dated June 7, 2001, wherein the visa officer refused the applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [3] The applicant is a citizen of Israel who applied for permanent residence in Canada as an independent skilled worker under the category of Food Processing Engineer, National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2148.4. [...] [6] The applicant's application for permanent residence was denied. This is the judicial review of the decision of the visa officer.
-
755.
Gill v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 911 - 2008-07-25
Federal Court Decisions[1] On August 14, 2001, the Applicant applied for permanent residence (the Application) as a skilled worker based on her qualifications as an accountant (NOC 1111.2) and as a computer programmer (NOC 2163). [...] [14] In Moksud v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] F.C.J. No. 73, Mr. Justice Rouleau dealt with a case in which an application for permanent residence as a Software Engineer (NOC 2147.2) was denied. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3111-07 STYLE OF CAUSE: ARVINDER KAUR GILL v.
-
756.
Kasdi c. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1229 - 2016-11-03
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review under section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the Act) of a decision made by an immigration officer to deny the permanent resident visa that the applicants required to immigrate to Canada as skilled workers. [...] [3] This determination letter, dated May 4, 2016, was not particularly forthcoming as to why the permanent resident visa was not issued. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2014-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
757.
Majeed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1204 - 2015-10-26
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant applied in 2004 in the skilled worker category for a permanent residence visa. [...] [3] This is not the first time the Applicant has sought judicial review of his application for permanent residence. [...] [5] It is noteworthy that neither the 1st nor the 2nd CTR contain any notes entered into the Global Case Management System [GCMS] by the medical officers who reviewed the Applicant’s application for permanent residence.
-
758.
Ynzon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2022 FC 1265 - 2022-09-07
Federal Court DecisionsShe seeks judicial review of a decision by a senior immigration officer [Officer] to refuse her request to apply for permanent residence from within Canada on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds. [...] She also obtained a diploma as a Personal Support Worker. [11] Ms. Ynzon’s immediate family resides in the Philippines. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4115-20 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
759.
Porto Turizo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 721 - 2013-06-27
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Porto Turizo, a professional engineer from Columbia, applied for permanent residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker. [...] That particular classification in the material published by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada indicates that a university degree in civil engineering or a college diploma in construction technology is usually required and some employers may also require professional engineering status. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-11481-12 STYLE OF CAUSE: ANTONIO PORTO TURIZO and MCI
-
760.
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Hammoudeh - 2015 FC 298 - 2015-03-09
Federal Court DecisionsHe became a permanent resident of Canada on November 4, 2005. He is a pharmacist, and he immigrated to Canada as a skilled worker with his wife and three children. [...] [6] The Respondent’s permanent resident card expired on November 22, 2010. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-7430-13 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
761.
Mbakwe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 692 - 2011-06-14
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20110614 Docket: IMM-4836-09 [...] The Officer refused to grant the Applicant’s application for permanent residence based on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) considerations. [...] The difficulties associated with uprooting himself are a consequence of his choice to make his home in a country where he does not have permanent resident status.
-
762.
Alameddine v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 1285 - 2019-10-10
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for permanent residence in Canada in April 2000 as a skilled worker. [...] Mr. Salhab came to Canada in May 2002 and became a permanent resident. [...] Mr. Salhab listed those applications: permanent residence card, citizenship and passport.
-
763.
Korayem v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 486 - 2011-04-21
Federal Court Decisions[6] In his affidavit, the Applicant claims to have over-stayed with the intention of re-applying for permanent residency. [...] On April 8, 2010 the Applicant filed an application for Permanent Residence on H&C grounds. [...] (c) The intent of the Applicant’s spouse to submit a spousal sponsorship application once she is approved for permanent residency through the skilled workers program;
-
764.
Sandramoorthy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 358 - 2011-03-23
Federal Court Decisions72. (1) A foreign national in Canada becomes a permanent resident if, following an examination, it is established that [...] 72. (1) L’étranger au Canada devient résident permanent si, à l’issue d’un contrôle, les éléments suivants sont établis : [...] However, the relevant overseas operation manuals specifically establish that age “lock-in” is to take place in those contexts (see, for example, Section 5.24 of “OP 1 – Procedures” (2010-09-23); Section 5.4 of “OP 2 - Processing Members of the Family Class” (2006-11-14); Section 9.3 of “OP 6 - Federal Skilled Workers”
-
765.
Pereira v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 1999-06-11
Federal Court DecisionsHe is described by the Plant Manager as a reliable, skilled and competent worker with an excellent record with the Company in his many years of employment there. [...] 70. (1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), where a removal order or conditional removal order is made against a permanent resident or against a person lawfully in possession of a valid returning resident permit issued to that person pursuant to the regulations, that person may appeal to the Appeal Division on either or [...] 70. (1) Sous réserve des paragraphes (4) et (5), les résidents permanents et les titulaires de permis de retour en cours de validité et conformes aux règlements peuvent faire appel devant la section d'appel d'une mesure de renvoi ou de renvoi conditionnel en invoquant les moyens suivants_:
-
766.
Gill v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 452 - 2015-04-10
Federal Court Decisions[1] Ms Kulwant Kaur Gill applied for permanent residence as a skilled worker to the Canadian High Commission in New Delhi. [...] [4] In 2013, an officer at the High Commission denied Ms Gill’s application for permanent residence, concluding that she had misrepresented or withheld material facts relating to her employment that could have led to an error in the administration of Canada’s immigration laws. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-904-14 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
767.
Fayazi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 1019 - 2021-10-01
Federal Court DecisionsIn October 2018 the applicants applied for Permanent Resident Travel Documents (PRTD) to enter Canada, as their permanent resident cards had expired. [...] The IAD also misstated Mr. Fayazi’s testimony regarding the applicants’ visit to Canada in 2013 to “land” and receive their permanent resident cards. [...] [40] As part of its analysis, the IAD reasonably assessed the applicants’ establishment, noting that they do not own property in Canada and have never worked in the country despite having obtained permanent resident status in the skilled worker category.
-
768.
Lin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 203 - 2012-02-13
Federal Court DecisionsIn the Decision, the Officer refused the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker Program [FSWP], finding her to be just one point shy of the 67 points required to qualify under the FSWP. [...] In result, the visa officer found the applicant lacked less than two months experience required to qualify him for a permanent residency visa under the FSWP. In those unique circumstances, the Court held that the visa officer owed a duty of procedural fairness to share the results of his calculation with the applicant. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3778-11 STYLE OF CAUSE: MA LI LIN v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
-
769.
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 244 - 2017-02-27
Federal Court Decisions[1] This Application for judicial review concerns a decision [the Decision] of a visa officer regarding the Applicant’s application for permanent resident status as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker Class. [...] [8] In the absence of any other explanation for that delay, an extension of time as required by Rule 6(1) of the Federal Courts Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection Rules, SOR/93-22 would not have been granted. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2797-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
770.
Guan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 274 - 2009-03-17
Federal Court Decisions[8] On September 6, 2005, the visa office received the Applicant’s application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] The Applicant applied as a skilled worker under the Manitoba Provincial Nominee Program. [...] [25] To be admitted as a permanent resident Wang Huan Huan must be a “dependent child” of the Applicant.
-
771.
Mfudi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 1319 - 2019-10-22
Federal Court DecisionsTo note that host in Canada is a Canadian Citizen who initially made a refugee claim, and then obtained permanent resident status through skilled worker application. [...] Also noted that no previous travel demonstrated. 1 child resides in France. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-637-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
772.
Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 955 - 2017-10-26
Federal Court DecisionsThe Officer refused his application for a permanent resident visa submitted under the Manitoba Provincial Nominee Program. [...] Following his nomination, he applied for a permanent resident visa and submitted supporting documentation. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-695-17 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
773.
Jones v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 1070 - 2018-10-24
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is the judicial review of a decision of a senior immigration officer (“Officer”) refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence, which was brought on humanitarian and compassionate (“H&C”) grounds pursuant to s 25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”). [...] In 1999, having been adopted by his aunt, he came to Canada as a permanent resident when he was 16 years old. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: IMM-4605-17 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
774.
Yao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 114 - 2009-02-03
Federal Court Decisions[3] In January 2006, Shou Min Yao applied to the Government of Quebec for selection as a permanent resident under an investor program. [...] [21] With respect to the importance of the decision, like many other decisions relating to the acquisition of a permanent residency status, it involves the granting of a privilege rather than a right. [...] [25] In the present instance, this entails that, for example, before reaching any conclusion based on s. 78 of the Regulations which is expressly said to apply only to the part of the Regulations dealing with the “Federal Skilled Workers Class”, the officer should have given an opportunity to the applicants to comment in
-
775.
Woldemariam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 1387 - 2023-10-18
Federal Court DecisionsFor example, immigrating to Canada as a skilled worker through the express entry system or provincial nominee program. [...] Therefore, the Officer found that having to wait until the Applicant qualifies as a permanent resident under another process is not a great hardship. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3478-21 STYLE OF CAUSE: