1,035 result(s)
-
401.
Kaur Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 55 - 2008-01-16
Federal Court DecisionsThey requested that if the visa officer refused Mrs. Grewal’s application for permanent residence, the visa officer continue processing Ayra’s application for permanent residence. [...] The permanent resident visa was mailed to the male Applicant on October 25, 2001. [...] [23] The applicants’ solicitors made legal submissions based on applicable jurisprudence at that time pointing out when Mr. Grewal applied for permanent residence in Canada under the skilled worker class, he was not married and therefore did not have to declare his wife because at the time of that application she was not
-
402.
Waraich v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1289 - 2015-11-19
Federal Court Decisions72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA or the Act] challenging a decision by an Immigration Officer from the Immigration and Medical Services Division of the High Commission of Canada in London, U.K. [the Officer] refusing the Applicant’s skilled worker permanent resident visa application. [...] On May 18, 2010, the Applicant applied for a permanent resident visa as skilled worker under the Information Systems Manager (NOC 0231) occupation. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1600-15 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
403.
Tollerene v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 538 - 2015-04-28
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for a permanent resident visa on April 16, 2013 under the Self-Employed Person Class in accordance with s 88(1) of the Regulations. [...] However, I agree with the Respondent that this NOC is intended for applications under the federal skilled worker scheme, and not the self-employed class. [...] While it is true that the NOC for federal skilled worker applicants in the athletes category may include “chess players and poker players”, the Regulations, definitions and guidelines that apply to self-employed immigrants are silent on this point.
-
404.
Bhatti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 186 - 2017-02-14
Federal Court Decisionsand Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [Act] for judicial review of the decision of an immigration officer at the Embassy of Canada in Warsaw [Visa Officer], dated April 15, 2016 [Decision], which denied the Applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class. [...] 40 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation [...] Together, they supported her work experience and covered a period of more than one year and therefore more than the period of qualifying work experience necessary for a Federal Skilled Worker application.
-
405.
Kachmazov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 53 - 2009-01-21
Federal Court DecisionsThis selection enables the applicant to apply for permanent residence in Canada under the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP). [...] (a) has applied in accordance with these Regulations for a temporary resident visa as a member of the visitor, worker or student class; [...] (b) whether the employment of the foreign national is likely to result in the creation or transfer of skills and knowledge for the benefit of Canadian citizens or permanent residents;
-
406.
Guerrero v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1048 - 2015-09-04
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for permanent residence in November 2010 under the Federal Skilled Worker Program. [...] [6] On November 15, 2013, Guerrero attended the port of entry at Carway, Alberta to finalize his permanent residence. [...] [12] As a result, the application for permanent residence was refused and the Applicant was found to be inadmissible to Canada for a period of five years from the date of the letter and pursuant to subsection 40(3) of the IRPA. He may not apply for permanent resident status during this five year period.
-
407.
Choksi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 555 - 2007-05-28
Federal Court Decisions[1] Pritesh Bharatkumar Choksi’s application for permanent residence under the skilled worker category was rejected by a visa officer, who found that he did not have the necessary employment experience. [...] [14] The jurisprudence of this Court recognizes that the assessment of an applicant for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class involves an exercise of discretion that should be given a high degree of deference. [...] FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4410-06
-
408.
Khela v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 134 - 2010-02-09
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20100209 Docket: IMM-3881-09 [...] all or almost all of the workers involved in the labour dispute are not Canadian citizens or permanent residents and the hiring of workers to replace the workers involved in the labour dispute is not prohibited by the Canadian law applicable in the province where the workers involved in the labour dispute are employed; [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3881-09 STYLE OF CAUSE: LAKHWINDER KHELA v.
-
409.
Lionel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 236 - 2009-03-04
Federal Court DecisionsI also note that the applicant would be eligible to apply for permanent residence from outside of Canada through the Economic Class... [...] 3. the immigration officer erred in finding that the applicant would be eligible to apply for permanent residence from abroad; [...] I also note that the applicant would be eligible to apply for permanent residence from outside of Canada through the Economic Class.
-
410.
Sanif v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) - 2010 FC 115 - 2010-02-04
Federal Court Decisions[2] The application in Court file IMM-864-09 seeks judicial review of a decision made by Immigration Officer Chong of the Canadian High Commission in Singapore on December 1, 2008, refusing an application for permanent residence in Canada under the Economic Class, Skilled Worker, on the ground that the principal applicant, [...] [5] The principal applicant, Ms. Zaharah Sanif, applied for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class in January 2008 on the basis of an offer of employment to Ms. Sanif from a Scarborough, Ontario firm called DPI Media Group Ltd., and a positive arranged employment opinion (AEO) issued by Service Canada. [...] 7. Where the Federal Court determines that the cancellation of a visa was unlawful is the permanent resident visa automatically reinstated?
-
411.
Lewis-Asonye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2022 FC 1349 - 2022-09-27
Federal Court DecisionsIt is an exceptional and discretionary measure and not an alternative means to obtain permanent residence. [...] [63] Ms. Lewis-Asonye provided evidence regarding the efforts she made, including her education, employment and other achievements, in order to meet the criteria for permanent residence under the CEC program, noting that she had been invited to apply for permanent residence. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2554-21 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
412.
Karunanithi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 54 - 2017-01-16
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is a judicial review of a decision by an officer [the Officer] of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] denying the Applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] Based on his continuous employment, Mr. Karunanithi created an online Express Entry profile and was issued an invitation by IRCC to apply for permanent residence as a federal skilled worker. [...] a) l’étranger est un résident temporaire ou a fait une demande de statut de résident temporaire, de visa de résident permanent ou de séjour au Canada à titre de résident temporaire ou de résident permanent;
-
413.
Sandhar v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 154 - 2002-02-12
Federal Court Decisions[3] In his application for permanent residence the applicant indicated his intended occupation in Canada was that of an assistant manager. [...] For the same reasons, the fact that the sponsoring brother in Canada had no prior restaurant experience before acquiring his restaurant franchise is irrelevant to the officer's assessment of the applicant seeking permanent residency in Canada as a permanent resident as a family business applicant. [...] FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF SOLICITORS AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD
-
414.
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Abou Antoun - 2018 FC 540 - 2018-05-24
Federal Court Decisions[6] Mr. Abou Antoun obtained his permanent residence under the skilled worker program and immigrated to Canada with his wife and his three children in July 2010. [...] [17] In order to maintain their status, a permanent resident must comply with a residency obligation. [...] Moreover, it is not in keeping with the skilled worker immigration class under which he obtained his permanent residence.
-
415.
Mina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1182 - 2010-11-25
Federal Court Decisions[3] This matter is in respect of an application in regard to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (IRPA), for leave to seek judicial review of a decision by a Visa Officer, dated November 11, 2009, wherein the Applicant’s permanent resident application, based on her skill as an [...] [4] The Applicant, Ms. Mira Mina, is an Egyptian national who applied for permanent residence as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] Subsection 76(3) of the IRPA Regulations permit an officer to substitute their evaluation of the likelihood to become economically established in Canada if the number of points awarded are not a sufficient indicator of whether the skilled worker may become economically established in Canada.
-
416.
Tokuda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 483 - 2011-04-20
Federal Court Decisionsand Refugee Protection Act, 2001, c. 27 (IRPA), for judicial review of a decision of an Immigration Officer (the Officer), dated May 24, 2010, wherein the Officer denied a request to seek a second evaluation of the applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker (FSW) Class. [...] [2] The applicant is a citizen of Japan who applied for permanent residence in Canada in June 2005 as a member of the FSW Class under section 75 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (the Regulations). [...] The applicant received a total point score of 66 out of a possible 100, below the required 67 points for permanent residence under the FSW Class.
-
417.
Zahid v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1263 - 2015-11-10
Federal Court Decisions[1] Ms. Zahid’s application for a permanent resident visa was denied. [...] [5] As a provincial nominee, her application fell within the Federal Skilled Worker Class of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations. [...] Section 87 thereof provides that this class is “... a class of persons who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada.” Section 87(3) of the Regulations goes on to provide that the certificate, in this case the one issued by Saskatchewan, may not be a sufficient
-
418.
Hameed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 527 - 2009-05-21
Federal Court Decisions[1] Since 2001, Mr. Saqib Hameed, a 46-year-old citizen of Pakistan, has been trying to obtain permanent residence in Canada as a skilled worker. [...] Mr. Hameed now seeks judicial review in respect of the second negative decision on his application for permanent residence. [...] ... 78(2) A maximum of 25 points shall be awarded for a skilled worker’s education as follows:
-
419.
Byrne v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 640 - 2017-06-30
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by an Immigration Officer [the Officer] dated November 18, 2016, refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Canadian Experience Class [CEC]. [...] [3] The Applicant, Mr. Thomas Francis Byrne, is a citizen of Ireland who applied for permanent residence under the CEC program. [...] [7] Mr. Byrne’s application for permanent residence under the CEC class also provided T4 slips issued by Dairy Queen Collingwood, intended to confirm his status as an employee.
-
420.
Zlotosz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 724 - 2017-07-26
Federal Court DecisionsEfforts to obtain permanent status through the Federal Skilled Worker and Federal Skilled Trades also failed. [...] [5] In May, 2016, the Applicants submitted their application for permanent residence on H&C grounds, seeking an exemption from the requirement to apply from overseas. [...] [13] The leading case on H&C applications to exempt applicants from the normal requirement to apply for permanent residence abroad is Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 at para. 44 [Kanthasamy].
-
421.
Kirec v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2006 FC 800 - 2006-06-23
Federal Court Decisions[2] The applicant is a citizen of Turkey and a permanent resident of the United States of America who is currently residing in the State of Florida. [...] [4] On or about April 29, 2003, the applicant filed an application for permanent residence in the skilled worker category. [...] [22] The respondent argues that family support should not be assessed in the present matter seeing as the applicant is applying for permanent residency based on the skilled worker category and not as a business class category.
-
422.
Masych v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1253 - 2010-12-08
Federal Court Decisions[8] The applicant is aware of the Saskatchewan Immigrant Nominee Program (SINP) where she can work for six months in a skilled occupation in Saskatchewan and then be nominated for permanent residence to Canada. [...] Can a temporary resident visa be denied for a worker with a Labour Market Opinion where that worker is not barred by any of the factors under Regulation 179 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations? [...] (a) has applied in accordance with these Regulations for a temporary resident visa as a member of the visitor, worker or student class;
-
423.
Chatha v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2024 FC 1028 - 2024-06-28
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant Akwinder Kaur Chatha applied for permanent residence under the Home Support Worker [HSW] class program. [...] [6] With the institutional context in mind, I am not persuaded that the officer erred in refusing the Applicant’s permanent resident [PR] application. [...] Skilled workers Qualité 75 (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if
-
424.
Rabiee v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 824 - 2011-07-06
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20110706 Docket: IMM-4923-10 [...] [1] This is an application for judicial review under section 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 26 (IRPA) of the decision rendered by a Visa Officer (Officer), dated July 11, 2010 denying the applicant’s application for permanent resident as a skilled worker. [...] [3] The applicant applied for permanent residence in the skilled worker class as a specialist physician (NOC 3111) in March 2009.
-
425.
Kopyl v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2000-07-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] Peter Kopyl is a 31 year old citizen of Ukraine who applied for permanent residence in Canada as an Independent-Skilled worker under the category of Facility Operations Manager, National Occupational Classification ("NOC") 721.0. [...] [2] He brings this application for judicial review of the decision of Lisa Norris, a visa officer at the Canadian Embassy in Warsaw, Poland, dated June 17, 1999, whereby Ms. Norris determined that Mr. Kopyl"s application for permanent residence in Canada was refused. [...] [6] By a letter dated June 17, 1999, Ms. Norris informed Mr. Kopyl that his application for permanent residence in Canada was refused.