1,035 result(s)
-
301.
Akpoduado v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 103 - 2017-01-26
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant has applied for judicial review of a decision [the Decision] of a Visa Officer [the Officer] at the Canadian High Commission in Accra, Nigeria, dated June 14, 2016 refusing his application for permanent residence as a federal skilled worker [FSW] and declaring him inadmissible to Canada for five years due [...] Did the Officer err in failing to reconsider the Applicant’s application for permanent residence? [...] • There was nothing concerning about the fact that a Colleague made a similar application for permanent residence.
-
302.
Gugliotti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 71 - 2017-01-19
Federal Court Decisions[6] On February 24, 2016, the Applicant received another letter from CIC, informing her that she had scored an overall point total of 465 and inviting her to apply for permanent residency as a member of the Federal Skilled Workers Class. [...] [25] Section 76(1) of the IRPR, which governs the selection criteria for the Federal Skilled Workers Class, states: [...] 76 (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria:
-
303.
Karunanithi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 54 - 2017-01-16
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is a judicial review of a decision by an officer [the Officer] of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] denying the Applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] Based on his continuous employment, Mr. Karunanithi created an online Express Entry profile and was issued an invitation by IRCC to apply for permanent residence as a federal skilled worker. [...] a) l’étranger est un résident temporaire ou a fait une demande de statut de résident temporaire, de visa de résident permanent ou de séjour au Canada à titre de résident temporaire ou de résident permanent;
-
304.
Fredy’s Welding Inc. v. Canada (Employment and Social Development) - 2017 FC 7 - 2017-01-03
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicant stated that despite extensive recruitment efforts it had been unable to find a Canadian or permanent resident candidate with the required skill set and experience to fill the position. [...] They also indicate the Applicant’s efforts to hire a Canadian or permanent resident in Canada. [...] (b) whether the employment of the foreign national will or is likely to result in the development or transfer of skills and knowledge for the benefit of Canadian citizens or permanent residents;
-
305.
Ikeji v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1422 - 2017-01-03
Federal Court DecisionsAnd, although she claimed to own and operate a business, she had provided insufficient evidence to support that claim or that she had established herself to such a degree that an exemption from having to apply for permanent residence status from outside Canada was warranted. [...] [64] The Officer engaged with the facts and found that the evidence was not sufficient to establish that the Applicant had established herself to such a degree than an exemption to apply for permanent residence from outside Canada was warranted. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1850-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
306.
Kozul v. Canada (Employment and Social Development) - 2016 FC 1316 - 2016-11-28
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicants also noted that the TFW could fill the immediate labour shortage as well as teach and develop the skills of other Canadians and permanent residents as to the handling, installation and fabrication of copper sheet metal. [...] As a result, the Employer has not been able to demonstrate he has made reasonable efforts to hire Canadians and permanent residents as outlined in R203 (3) (e). [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-736-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
307.
Ghali v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) - 2016 FC 1277 - 2016-11-15
Federal Court DecisionsThis applies to all assessments of full-time work under the Skilled Workers Program, including whether a job offer in Canada is full-time and whether to grant points for prior work experience in assessing an applicant’s economic suitability to Canada. [...] Residency obligation 28 (1) A permanent resident must comply with a residency obligation with respect to every five-year period. [...] (b) a decision is made outside of Canada that the permanent resident has failed to comply with the residency obligation.
-
308.
Kasdi c. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1229 - 2016-11-03
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review under section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the Act) of a decision made by an immigration officer to deny the permanent resident visa that the applicants required to immigrate to Canada as skilled workers. [...] [3] This determination letter, dated May 4, 2016, was not particularly forthcoming as to why the permanent resident visa was not issued. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2014-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
309.
Bian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1219 - 2016-11-02
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of a visa officer’s [the Officer] refusal of Li Bian’s [Mr. Bian] application for a permanent resident visa under the Canadian Experience Class [CEC]. [...] [3] Mr. Bian applied for permanent resident status on the basis that he had completed one year of work experience as an Assistant Buyer for Libra & Aquarius Inc. He applied under the National Occupation Classification [NOC] 6222 - Retail and Wholesale Buyers category, which qualifies Mr. Bian under CEC. In rejecting Mr. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-923-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
310.
Hadian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1182 - 2016-10-24
Federal Court Decisions[4] In 2006, Dr. Hadian submitted an application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker Class to the Canadian Embassy in Syria. [...] On January 29, 2015, Dr. Hadian was informed that he was inadmissible under s 34(1)(d) of the IRPA, and that his request for a permanent residence visa was refused. [...] [6] Dr. Hadian filed an application for judicial review of the refusal to grant him a permanent residence visa.
-
311.
Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. - 2016 FC 1047 - 2016-09-16
Federal Court DecisionsThe patent is not addressed to an ordinary member of the public, but to a worker skilled in the art described by Dr. Fox as [...] [353] The burden of proof resides on the shoulders of the Plaintiff for the patentee must show by conclusive evidence what the royalty rate should be. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: T-1353-13 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
312.
Cabral v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1040 - 2016-09-14
Federal Court DecisionsShe previously reviewed and assessed a number of different types of applications for eligibility under the economic class under the federal skilled worker program, Canadian experience class, and FSTC. [...] Federal Skilled Trades Class Application Requirements [17] There are a number of programs in Canada under which persons may immigrate to and seek permanent residence in Canada. [...] Federal Skilled Trades Class Travailleurs de métiers spécialisés (fédéral)
-
313.
Nookala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1019 - 2016-09-08
Federal Court DecisionsSkilled Canadian work experience gained through the Program then helps graduates qualify for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [17] Perhaps because what he was seeking was a form of work permit, Mr. Nookala’s application for restoration of status stated that he was seeking to restore his status as a “worker”. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-326-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
314.
Shah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1012 - 2016-09-07
Federal Court DecisionsIn September 2012, Ms. Shah submitted an application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: IMM-2408-15 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
315.
Asl v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1006 - 2016-09-06
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Mahmoud Hoseinnejad Asl is seeking judicial review of a visa officer’s decision refusing his application for permanent residence under the Skilled Worker category, on the basis that he is inadmissible pursuant to paragraphs 40(1)(a) and 40(2)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA]. [...] In May 2013, he submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada under the Skilled Worker class. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-374-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
316.
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1005 - 2016-09-06
Federal Court Decisions[3] The Applicant later submitted an application for permanent residence under the CEC as a “religious worker”, which is under National Occupational Classification [NOC] code 4217. [...] B. Did the visa officer err in refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence? [...] B. Did the visa officer err in refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence?
-
317.
Shaat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 960 - 2016-08-24
Federal Court DecisionsShe applied for permanent residency under the skilled worker class. The application included her daughter Rahmah as a dependent. [...] [6] In December 2015 a Designated Immigration Officer [Officer] rejected Ms. Shaat’s application for permanent residence under the skilled worker class finding Rahmah medically inadmissible on health grounds because her health condition might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demand on health or social services in [...] [28] The Officer did not commit a reviewable error in considering Ms. Shaat’s application for permanent residency under the skilled worker class and in determining that Rahmah was medically inadmissible to Canada.
-
318.
Islam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 913 - 2016-08-10
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant applies for leave and judicial review of the decision of the Immigration Officer, High Commission of Canada, Immigration Section, Singapore, dated November 16, 2015, denying the Applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Skilled Worker Category and finding the Applicant inadmissible for [...] [3] Based on his work experience, the Applicant submitted an Application for Permanent Residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] under the occupation stream NOC 2171: Information Systems Analysts and Consultants. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-335-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
319.
El-khairy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 861 - 2016-07-22
Federal Court DecisionsOn June 9, 2009 he entered Canada through Montreal, Quebec and was granted permanent resident status as a skilled worker. [...] (i) un demi-jour pour chaque jour de résidence au Canada avant son admission à titre de résident permanent, [...] (ii) un jour pour chaque jour de résidence au Canada après son admission à titre de résident permanent;
-
320.
Narang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 863 - 2016-07-22
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application under s 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [Act] for judicial review of a decision of a visa officer [Officer] dated November 20, 2015 [Decision], which denied the Applicant’s application for permanent resident status under the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] category. [...] In February 2004, she submitted an application for permanent residence under the FSW class. [...] 40 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation
-
321.
Iqbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 825 - 2016-07-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] An Immigration Officer [Officer] rejected the Applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the Skilled Worker Class and held that the Applicant is inadmissible to Canada for misrepresentation under paragraph 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA]. [...] He applied for permanent residence status under the Federal Skilled Worker Class (NOC 1123) in May 2014. [...] This could have contributed to your approval for a permanent resident visa.
-
322.
S. N. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 821 - 2016-07-19
Federal Court DecisionsThey have made an application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker Class, which was denied by a visa officer operating out of the Canadian Embassy in [REDACTED]. [...] 34 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for [...] This letter is in reference to your application for permanent residence in Canada.
-
323.
Lamsen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 815 - 2016-07-18
Federal Court DecisionsNovember 11, 2015 decision by a Unit Supervisor [the Supervising Officer] at the Immigration Section of the Canadian Embassy in Manila, Philippines [the Visa Office] to refuse the Applicant a permanent residence visa under the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class on the basis that she had misrepresented her work experience. [...] Her mother, father, and brother are permanent residents of Canada. [3] On September 15, 2014, the Applicant applied for permanent residence as a member of the FSW class. [...] 40 (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation
-
324.
Cortez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 800 - 2016-07-13
Federal Court DecisionsOn January 15, 2000, he applied for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] [4] The Applicant was granted permanent residence status and entered Canada on April 4, 2005. [...] ... (d) subject to subsection (10), the sponsor previously made an application for permanent residence and became a permanent resident and, at the time of that application, the foreign national was a non-accompanying family member of the sponsor and was not examined.
-
325.
Ramezanpour v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 751 - 2016-07-05
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is a judicial review, pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act], of a September 4, 2015 decision [the Decision] by a visa officer [the Officer] rejecting the Applicant’s application for permanent residence as a skilled worker. [...] On February 11, 2013, she applied for permanent residence as a skilled worker under National Operation Classification [NOC] unit group 6322, or “Cooks”. [...] [13] As a result, the Officer was not satisfied that the Applicant met the requirements for permanent residence as a skilled worker and refused her application.