1,035 result(s)
-
201.
Selmanaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 359 - 2012-03-28
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant seeks judicial review of a decision of a Program Support Officer (the Officer), dated July 19, 2011, refusing the applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] He submitted an application under the federal skilled worker class, in the category NOC-7265 (welders) in April 2011. [...] [4] By letter dated July 19, 2011, the Officer found that the applicant did not meet the requirements for permanent residence.
-
202.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 58 - 2008-01-16
Federal Court Decisions[1] Amarjeet Singh seeks judicial review of the decision of a visa officer refusing his application for permanent residency as a skilled worker. [...] [6] On October 1, 2004, Mr. Singh submitted an application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the skilled worker class. [...] 2. Whether a visa officer must consider subsection 76(3) in the case of a person applying for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker where that person alleges that he has worked in Canada and has a job offer in Canada and that his work has been under section 186 of the Regulations.
-
203.
Mehmi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 1246 - 2011-11-01
Federal Court Decisions[14] With respect to the second issue, in Kumar, above, Justice David Near found that an officer’s decision on the language skills of an applicant for permanent residence as a skilled worker was reasonableness. [...] [17] The Applicant notes that CIC’s OP-6 Federal Skilled Workers manual for applications under the Federal Skilled Workers Program directs that officers should use objective measures to test language abilities. [...] The OP-6 Federal Skilled Worker manual is not applicable to applications under the LCP. Although a standardized test is an appropriate way to assess language ability for the Federal Skilled Worker Program, this does not mean it is an appropriate way to assess language ability under the LCP.
-
204.
Chaudhry v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 991 - 2017-11-02
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant has applied for judicial review of a decision [the Decision] of an immigration officer [the Officer] dated March 20, 2017, refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence [PR] as a member of the Federal Skilled Trades [FST] class. [...] Therefore, PA has accumulated 17 months of full-time experience in primary NOC during the five years before the date on which is permanent residence application was made. [...] THIS COURT ORDERS that the Decision is set aside and the Applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Trades class is to be reconsidered by a different officer.
-
205.
Patel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 545 - 2008-05-02
Federal Court DecisionsHe made an application for permanent residence in Canada under the skilled worker class in July 2001. [...] [6] The Officer refused the applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the skilled worker class. [...] [9] In her assessment under the current Regulations, the Officer assessed the applicant under the federal skilled worker class on the basis of the criteria set out in subsection 76(1) of the Regulations, in order to determine whether the applicant could become economically established in Canada.
-
206.
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Abderrazak - 2018 FC 602 - 2018-06-11
Federal Court Decisions[4] On March 15, 2012, the respondent, a citizen of Tunisia and France, arrived in Canada and became a permanent resident as a Quebec-selected skilled worker. [...] The respondent’s arguments are entirely based on his investment activities, even though he obtained permanent resident status as a selected skilled worker. [...] There is no evidence supporting the IAD’s finding that he was unable to obtain a job in Canada, as was the case for obtaining his permanent residence as a selected skilled worker.
-
207.
You v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 1675 - 2023-12-12
Federal Court Decisions72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA], of a decision made by an Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] officer [Officer] on June 28, 2022, in which the Officer refused their application for a permanent residence visa filed in the Quebec-Selected Skilled Workers category. [...] [7] In January 2020, the applicants obtained their Québec certificate of selection [CSQ], and in March 2020, they submitted their application for permanent residence to the IRCC from South Korea, under the Quebec-Selected Skilled Workers category. [...] [27] To summarize, under the IRPA, it is the federal government who has the final authority to grant permanent resident visas to foreign nationals.
-
208.
Bazarova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 704 - 2023-05-19
Federal Court Decisions[5] In 2017, the applicant applied for permanent residence under the Québec Skilled Worker Class. [...] Québec Skilled Worker Class Travailleurs qualifiés (Québec) Class [...] (5) A foreign national who is an accompanying family member of a person who makes an application as a member of the Québec skilled worker class shall become a permanent resident if, following an examination, it is established that
-
209.
Yasmin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1346 - 2015-12-04
Federal Court DecisionsOtherwise the granting of permanent residency would be based upon a contingent outcome in the future. [...] 791 cited by the Applicants where it was found that the officer was applying the criteria from the skilled worker class is distinguishable inasmuch as there is no suggestion here that a language skill is not relevant to being able to perform the job, whether or not it is also a factor for a skilled worker NOC evaluation. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-8464-14 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
210.
Liang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 758 - 2012-06-14
Federal Court DecisionsBackground: Changes to the Federal Skilled Worker Program The Ministerial Instructions. [...] [1] The applicants seek orders of mandamus compelling the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Minister) to process their applications for permanent residence under the federal skilled worker (FSW) class. [...] [...] New federal skilled worker applicants, including those with arranged employment, should receive a decision within six to 12 months.
-
211.
Amiri v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 205 - 2019-02-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] Gholamreza Ghodrati Amiri is an Iranian citizen whose application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Workers Program was refused on security grounds. [...] [7] On January 10, 2010, Mr. Amiri applied for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Workers Program. [...] [47] As noted earlier, Mr. Amiri’s application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Workers Program was filed on January 10, 2010.
-
212.
Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 167 - 2011-02-11
Federal Court Decisions[2] The Applicant put forth her application for permanent residence under the skilled worker class, pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”). [...] [9] In this respect, the OP6 Manual – Federal Skilled Workers is relevant. [...] Proficiency in other languages, while laudable, is simply not relevant within the requirements for permanent residency under the skilled worker class.
-
213.
Patel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1025 - 2010-10-20
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant, Jigarkumar Patel, seeks an order quashing a decision of a visa officer, rendered on January 5, 2010, by which his application for permanent residence under the skilled worker class was refused. [...] [4] Mr. Patel submitted his application for permanent residency in January 2008. [...] [...] [...] (b) for any previous period of study in Canada by the skilled worker or the skilled worker's spouse or common-law partner, 5 points;
-
214.
Wijesinghe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 54 - 2010-01-20
Federal Court DecisionsAlso of concern is that the consultant states PA could pursue PR status in CDA if he chose knowing full well that low skilled workers do not qualify for PR status in CDA. Not satisfied that PA is a genuine temporary worker. [...] Also of concern is that the consultant (the applicant’s immigration consultant) states PA could pursue PR (permanent residence) status in CDA if he chose knowing full well that low skilled workers do not qualify for PR status in Canada. [...] With this qualification, with his experience, with his education, and with his alleged fluency in English, the applicant would have the legal right to apply for permanent resident status as a skilled worker after he returns to Sri Lanka at the conclusion of his work visa.
-
215.
Qureshi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 927 - 2007-09-24
Federal Court Decisions[4] The applicant was born in Jaypur, India in 1946 and first applied for permanent residence in Canada from Bucharest, Romania in 1997. [...] [5] The applicant applied for permanent residence under the federal skilled workers program in two occupations, which are assigned a specific code and criteria under the National Occupation Classification (NOC), established by Human Resources Canada: Financial Manager (NOC Code 0111) and Finances Clerk (NOC Code 1434.3). [...] b) The criteria of the IRP Regulations, pertaining to federal skilled workers.
-
216.
Dhillon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 391 - 2019-04-01
Federal Court Decisions13(1) A Canadian citizen or permanent resident, or a group of Canadian citizens or permanent residents, a corporation incorporated under a law of Canada or of a province or an unincorporated organization or association under federal or provincial law — or any combination of them — may sponsor a foreign national, subject to [...] 13(1) Tout citoyen canadien, résident permanent ou groupe de citoyens canadiens ou de résidents permanents ou toute personne morale ou association de régime fédéral ou provincial — ou tout groupe de telles de ces personnes ou associations — peut, sous réserve des règlements, parrainer un étranger. [...] (b) the economic class, consisting of the federal skilled worker class, the transitional federal skilled worker class, the Quebec skilled worker class, the provincial nominee class, the Canadian experience class, the federal skilled trades class, the Quebec investor class, the Quebec entrepreneur class, the start-up
-
217.
Hammad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 459 - 2018-04-27
Federal Court DecisionsIn 2014, she applied for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] program. [...] Skilled workers Qualité 75 (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if [...] This refers to your application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker class.
-
218.
Karami v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 846 - 2018-08-20
Federal Court DecisionsThe officer denied the Applicant’s application for permanent residence, under the Federal Skilled Worker Class, because the officer found the application to be incomplete, pursuant to sections 10 and 12.01 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (IRPR). [...] He applied for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker Class on July 21, 2016. [...] [26] In the Applicant’s case the requirements were communicated by way of the document checklist instructions contained within the invitation to apply for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class (found in the Applicant’s Record at page 23).
-
219.
Khorasgani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 1177 - 2012-10-09
Federal Court DecisionsThe principal applicant, Dr. Khorasgani, is a pediatrician who wants to be admitted in the Federal Skilled Worker Class. [...] [3] Section 79 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 [Regulations] sets out the language test requirements for a permanent residency application made by a skilled worker: [...] 40. (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible for misrepresentation
-
220.
Cobham v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 585 - 2009-06-04
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20090604 Docket: IMM-3407-08 [...] [9] Next, the officer considered the potential hardship facing the applicant were she to return to Barbados to apply for permanent residence. [...] [14] According to the applicant, given her advanced age and low educational achievement, she would not meet the minimum criteria for permanent residence as a skilled worker.
-
221.
Singh Tiwana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 100 - 2008-01-25
Federal Court DecisionsIn her decision, the Visa Officer refused the Applicant’s application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the skilled workers class. [...] The required threshold for the issuance of a permanent residence visa is 67 points. [...] 83(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), an officer shall evaluate the educational credentials of a skilled worker's accompanying spouse or accompanying common-law partner as if the spouse or common-law partner were a skilled worker, and shall award points to the skilled worker as follows:
-
222.
Odunsi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 208 - 2016-02-17
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act] of the decision of an Immigration officer [the Officer] dated June 3, 2015, refusing the Applicant’s application for a permanent residence as a Federal Skilled Worker due to the [...] [2] Ayodeji Oluwole Odunsi [the Applicant] is a citizen of Nigeria who applied for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class. [...] This provision requires that the skilled worker without arranged employment must:
-
223.
Tabañag v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 1293 - 2011-11-10
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Bryan Cabrera Tabañag applied for permanent resident status as a skilled worker indicating that he had work experience as an Architect in Manila, Philipines. [...] In submitting his application for permanent residence, he followed the instructions in a document provided by the respondent for such applications from Manila. [...] Otherwise, the parties submit and I agree that the standard of review for decisions on permanent residence under the federal skilled worker class has been satisfactorily determined in the jurisprudence to be reasonableness: Oladipo v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 366 at para 23; and Kaur v Canada
-
224.
Synyshyn v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 1318 - 2005-09-26
Federal Court Decisions[1] Maria Synyshyn is a citizen of Ukraine, who applied for permanent residence in Canada as a skilled worker. [...] [3] Ms. Synyshyn applied for permanent residence in Canada on February 16, 2002 on behalf of herself and her two sons. [...] 76 (3) Whether or not the skilled worker has been awarded the minimum number of required points referred to in subsection (2), an officer may substitute for the criteria set out in paragraph (1)(a) their evaluation of the likelihood of the ability of the skilled worker to become economically established in Canada if the
-
225.
Asadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 536 - 2016-05-13
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27, of a decision of a Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) visa officer (the Officer) refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker (FSW) [...] 76 (3) Whether or not the skilled worker has been awarded the minimum number of required points referred to in subsection (2), an officer may substitute for the criteria set out in paragraph (1)(a) their evaluation of the likelihood of the ability of the skilled worker to become economically established in Canada if the [...] Nowhere is “integrity” included among the requirements in section 76 of the Regulations for membership in the federal skilled worker class.