1,033 result(s)
-
126.
Shukla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 1461 - 2012-12-10
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicant is requesting an order of mandamus with respect to his application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker class. [...] He first submitted an application for Permanent Residence as a Federal Skilled Worker at the High Commission of Canada in New Delhi, India, on or about 25 February 2004. [...] This section terminated all applications for permanent resident visas in the Federal Skilled Worker category that were not decided by 29 March 2012.
-
127.
Zhu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 155 - 2013-02-15
Federal Court Decisions[2] Citizenship and Immigration Canada [CIC] received the Applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class on September 5, 2006. [...] pre-February 27, 2008 federal skilled worker applications that had not been given a selection decision by March 29, 2012. [...] 2. The decision to refuse Mr. Zhu’s application for permanent residence in the Federal Skilled Worker class is set aside.
-
128.
Bhatt v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 1124 - 2008-10-06
Federal Court Decisions[1] A visa officer rejected Ms. Bhatt’s application for permanent residence as a member of the federal skilled workers class. [...] 75(1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if (a) within the 10 years preceding the date of their application for a permanent resident visa, they have at least one year of continuous full-time employment experience, as described in subsection 80(7), or the equivalent in continuous part-time employment in one or more
-
129.
Singh Tathgur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 1293 - 2007-12-10
Federal Court Decisions[1] In 2001, Mr. Rupinder Singh Tathgur (the “Applicant”) applied for a permanent resident visa as a member of an economic - skilled worker class. [...] The Immigration Officer, Heather Dubé, (the “Visa Officer”) determined that the Applicant did not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada as a permanent resident under an economic – skilled worker class. [...] He applied for a permanent resident visa under the assisted relative category and under three skilled worker classes: Contractor and Supervisor – Mechanics and Trades, Construction Estimator and Civil Engineering Technologists and Technicians.
-
130.
Liu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 42 - 2014-01-15
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is a judicial review by way of mandamus concerning an application for a visa under the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class. [...] 87.4 (1) An application by a foreign national for a permanent resident visa as a member of the prescribed class of federal skilled workers that was made before February 27, 2008 is terminated if, before March 29, 2012, it has not been established by an officer, in accordance with the regulations, whether the applicant meets [...] ... 42 Parliament's clear intent in enacting subsection 87.4 of the Act was to "terminate" permanent skilled worker applications made before 27 February 2008.
-
131.
Khoshnavaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 1134 - 2013-11-13
Federal Court Decisions[2] The Applicant seeks judicial review of the refusal of an Immigration Officer to process his application for permanent residence under the federal skilled worker class [PR application]. [...] [6] On July 28, 2010, the Applicant submitted an application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the
-
132.
Dehghan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 680 - 2013-06-18
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for permanent residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker in December, 2009. [...] As such, the Applicant did not meet the requirements for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker class. [...] [13] The first issue involves an evaluation of the Officer’s award of points under the Federal Skilled Worker category.
-
133.
Philbean v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 487 - 2011-04-21
Federal Court Decisions[3] In April 2009, the applicant submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada in the Federal Skilled Worker Class based on her qualifications and work experience as a registered nurse. [...] [5] By letter dated June 7, 2010, the applicant was informed that her application for permanent residence had been refused. [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria:
-
134.
Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 306 - 2010-03-16
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicants seek judicial review of the decision of P. Purcell, Second Secretary, Immigration, (the Officer) received on or about May 29, 2009 rejecting Ms. Shalini Kumar’s application for a permanent residence visa in Canada as a member of the skilled worker class. [...] [5] Ms. Kumar applied to the Canadian High Commission in New Delhi for permanent residency in Canada as a skilled worker in November 2008. [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the
-
135.
Ali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 879 - 2013-08-19
Federal Court DecisionsThe Reconsideration Officer refused to re-consider the Principal Applicant’s [PA] claim for Permanent Residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker. [...] He applied for permanent residence in Canada as a federal skilled worker in May, 2010. [...] 1. The decision of the reconsideration officer refusing the Principal Applicant’s request to reconsider his application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker class is set aside;
-
136.
Nisreen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 469 - 2018-05-01
Federal Court Decisionsunreasonable as it exceeds the language requirements in the federal skilled worker program, Canadian experience class, and federal skilled trades program set by the Minister under s 74(1) of the IRPR. Even though both the federal skilled worker and federal skilled trades programs have no requirement of Canadian work [...] Although this principle arose in the context of applications for study permits, it has also been applied to an application for permanent residence as a skilled worker. [...] S. 74(l) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations states that the Minister shall fix minimum language proficiency thresholds for economic immigration classes: the Federal Skilled Worker Program (FSWP), Canadian Experience Class (CEC), and Federal Skilled Trades Program (FSTP).
-
137.
Dashtban v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 160 - 2015-02-06
Federal Court Decisions[1] Pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [Act], the Applicant seeks judicial review of the decision of an immigration officer [Officer] which denied his application for permanent residence as a member of the federal skilled workers class. [...] [2] The Applicant is a citizen of Iran who, on March 19, 2010, applied for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the federal skilled worker class, claiming to be a dentist (National Occupational Classification [NOC] Code 3113) and a manager in healthcare (NOC Code 0311). [...] [51] In view of the foregoing decisions of this Court, it is apparent that a visa officer’s assessment of an application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the federal skilled worker class is not only a fact-driven process, but a discretionary one as well.
-
138.
Dhillon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1049 - 2010-10-26
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review, pursuant to section 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, of a decision of a Visa Officer of the High Commission of Canada, denying the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] On May 7, 2009, he submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada as a skilled worker. [...] [31] The applicant also notes that nowhere in the Act, the Regulations, or the Federal Skilled Workers’ Manual is it stated that Visa Officers are only to consider the documents listed on the Kit Checklist.
-
139.
Albajjali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 660 - 2013-06-20
Federal Court DecisionsIn the decision, dated June 28, 2012, the officer refused the applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker class. [...] [2] The applicant is a 39-year-old citizen of Jordan who applied for a permanent resident visa under the Federal Skilled Worker class. [...] (a) the skilled worker or the skilled worker’s accompanying spouse or accompanying common-law partner is related by blood, marriage, common-law partnership or adoption to a person who is a Canadian citizen or permanent resident living in Canada and who is
-
140.
Wijayansinghe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 811 - 2015-06-30
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review, pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA], of a decision of a visa officer [the Officer] dated May 29, 2014 refusing Ms. Pathirannahelage’s application for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria:
-
141.
Sarfraz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2019 FC 1578 - 2019-12-10
Federal Court DecisionsAfter securing a job offer as a retail sales/trade supervisor with Husky Travel Centre, a Saskatchewan-based employer that operates service stations, Mr. Sarfraz applied for and received a provincial nomination for permanent residence through the Saskatchewan Immigration Nominee Program [SINP] International Skilled Worker - [...] “The applicant was nominated under the International Skilled Worker – with Employment Offer category. [...] The category was incepted in 2014 and it was developed from (to replace) the old Skilled Worker/Professional category.
-
142.
Bazaid v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 17 - 2013-01-10
Federal Court Decisions[3] The Applicant seeks judicial review of the refusal of an Immigration Officer to process his application for permanent residence under the federal skilled worker class. [...] [15] In January 2012, the Applicant applied to be selected for permanent residence as a member of the federal skilled worker class under the NOC 3111 class [PR Application]. [...] Instructions for processing Federal Skilled Worker applications Federal Skilled Worker applications
-
143.
Kimball v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 428 - 2013-04-29
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for a permanent resident visa under the Federal Skilled Worker program, which was rejected by an immigration officer of the Consulate General of Canada, Immigration Section, in New York City on June 20, 2012. [...] The applicant’s permanent residence application was therefore rejected. [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria:
-
144.
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 131 - 2016-02-04
Federal Court DecisionsThe Officer refused the Applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a member of the federal skilled worker [FSW] class, finding that, contrary to subsection 75(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 [the Regulations], she lacked the intention to reside outside of Quebec. [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] [9] The Officer noted that both subsection 11(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act] and subsection 75(3) of the Regulations require a foreign national to satisfy the legislative requirements in order to obtain a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker, which the Applicant failed to
-
145.
Anata v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 665 - 2017-07-07
Federal Court DecisionsThey say that Hamid is not applicable because the circumstances in that case involved a child of a federal skilled worker, not a child of a live-in caregiver. [...] A child of a federal skilled worker who has applied for a visa, who was 22 years of age or over, and who was considered dependent on the skilled worker at the date of application by virtue of his or her financial dependence and full-time study, but who does not meet the requirements of a “dependent child” within the meaning [...] [65] The Applicants’ attempts to distinguish Hamid on the basis that theirs was a live-in caregiver application and not a skilled-worker application are unconvincing.
-
146.
Afolabi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 1364 - 2012-11-26
Federal Court DecisionsHe submitted an application for Permanent Residence as a Federal Skilled Worker at the High Commission of Canada in Accra, Ghana based on his professional qualifications as a Financial Manager. [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: [...] [25] In his permanent resident visa application, the Applicant sought to be assessed for NOC 0111 Financial Manager.
-
147.
De Azeem v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1043 - 2015-09-02
Federal Court Decisionsand Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA], seeking to set aside a decision, rendered on August 4, 2014 by a visa officer at the Embassy of Canada in Mexico whereby the application for a permanent resident visa within the Federal Skilled Worker Class of Ms. Maria Isabel Angel de Azeem (the applicant) was refused. [...] [8] On July 8, 2011, Ms. Angel de Azeem filed an application for a permanent resident visa within the Federal Skilled Worker Class, with her two daughters as dependents. [...] [24] The visa officer’s evaluation of the permanent resident visa application in the Federal Skilled Worker Class and determination that the applicant is inadmissible for misrepresentation engages questions of fact and mixed law and fact.
-
148.
Paul v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1075 - 2010-11-02
Federal Court DecisionsHe submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada as a skilled worker to the High Commission of Canada in Singapore in July 2006 – four and one-half years ago. [...] Further, it is appropriate to order the respondent to give prompt attention to the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] 1. This application is allowed and the decision of the Immigration Officer dated February 11, 2010, denying the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker is set aside.
-
149.
Senadheera v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 704 - 2012-06-12
Federal Court DecisionsThe officer refused the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the Act and section 76 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (the “Regulations”). [...] He submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker Program in December 2009. [...] The application for judicial review of the decision of Designated Immigration Officer U. Atukorala, refusing the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, and section 76 of the Immigration and
-
150.
McLachlan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 975 - 2009-09-28
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Lindsay Hill McLachlan, the Applicant, applies for judicial review of an Immigration Officer’s decision rejecting his application for a permanent residence visa under the skilled worker category. [...] He applied for permanent residence under the skilled worker category in January 2006 and included his wife and two children in his application. [...] [3] Ms. Carol A. Turner, the Immigration Officer at the High Commission of Canada refused Mr. McLachlan’s application for a permanent residence visa.