1,033 result(s)
-
76.
Vikas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 207 - 2009-02-26
Federal Court Decisions[3] Vikas (his only name) filed an application for permanent residence as a skilled worker through the Consulate in Buffalo, New York on or about July 31, 2006. [...] (a) the number of applications by skilled workers as members of the federal skilled worker class currently being processed; [...] (b) the number of skilled workers projected to become permanent residents according to the report to Parliament referred to in section 94 of the Act; and
-
77.
Abro v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 1258 - 2009-12-10
Federal Court Decisionsreview pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the Act), of the decision of Immigration Officer Theresa Bason (the Officer) refusing to substitute her evaluation of the Applicant’s application for permanent residence in Canada under the federal skilled worker class. [...] [2] Tikvah Beryl Abro (the Applicant) made an application for permanent residence as a member of the federal skilled worker class to the High Commission of Canada in Pretoria, South Africa. [...] 76. (3) Whether or not the skilled worker has been awarded the minimum number of required points referred to in subsection (2), an officer may substitute for the criteria set out in paragraph (1)(a) their evaluation of the likelihood of the ability of the skilled worker to become economically established in Canada if the
-
78.
Lackhee v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 1270 - 2008-11-17
Federal Court Decisions76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: [...] (a) the number of applications by skilled workers as members of the federal skilled worker class currently being processed; [...] (b) the number of skilled workers projected to become permanent residents according to the report to Parliament referred to in section 94 of the Act; and
-
79.
Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1072 - 2010-11-01
Federal Court Decisions[3] On February 26, 2008, the Federal Government introduced changes to the Act’s skilled worker processing scheme. [...] The Ministerial Instructions outline eligibility criteria that apply with respect to processing of all applications for permanent residence visas made under the federal skilled worker class as defined in the Act, that were received by CIC on or after February 27, 2008. [...] [5] For the federal skilled worker class, all applications must be sent to the Centralized Intake Office (CIO) in Sydney, Nova Scotia.
-
80.
Tineo Luongo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 618 - 2011-05-25
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant seeks judicial review of the decision of a Citizenship and Immigration visa officer denying her application for a permanent resident visa as a Skilled Worker. [...] Federal Skilled Worker Class Class 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to [...] Skilled workers (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if (a) within the 10 years preceding the date of their application for a permanent resident visa, they have at least one year of continuous full-time employment experience, as described in subsection 80(7), or the equivalent in continuous part-time employment in one
-
81.
Perilla-Gibney v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 403 - 2013-04-25
Federal Court Decisionsof the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27, (the “Act”) of the decision of a visa officer at the High Commission of Canada in London, United Kingdom, refusing the application for permanent residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker of the applicant, Ms. Maritza Rocio Perilla-Gibney (the “applicant”). [...] [8] It is the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227, (the “Regulations”) that govern how applications for permanent residency under the Federal Skilled Worker Class are to be assessed. [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of section 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the
-
82.
Yaseen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 985 - 2011-08-11
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for permanent residence under the Skilled Worker category in October 2006. [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria:
-
83.
Xu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 418 - 2010-04-16
Federal Court DecisionsIn January 2004 she applied for a permanent resident visa as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] (a) the number of applications by skilled workers as members of the federal skilled worker class currently being processed; [...] (b) the number of skilled workers projected to become permanent residents according to the report to Parliament referred to in section 94 of the Act; and
-
84.
Garcia Porfirio v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 794 - 2011-06-29
Federal Court Decisions[13] The Applicant then applied for permanent residence in the Skilled Worker class. [...] [14] The Applicant submitted his second Federal Skilled Worker application to the centralized in-take office (CIO) in Sydney, Nova Scotia. [...] [24] The Officer’s assessment of the Applicant for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class is an exercise of discretion that should be given a high degree of deference (Bellido v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 452, 138 ACWS (3d) 728 at para 5).
-
85.
Rezaeiazar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 761 - 2013-07-08
Federal Court Decisions75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: [...] 75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the
-
86.
Yu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 253 - 2014-03-14
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicant is requesting an order of mandamus with respect to his application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class. [...] (a) the number of applications by skilled workers as members of the federal skilled worker class currently being processed; [...] (b) the number of skilled workers projected to become permanent residents according to the report to Parliament referred to in section 94 of the Act; and
-
87.
Rashed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 175 - 2013-02-20
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of a refusal to reconsider his application for permanent residence [PR Application] as a federal skilled worker. [...] federal skilled worker applications shall be placed into processing immediately upon receipt if they: (i) are submitted with an AEO; (ii) are submitted by foreign nationals residing legally in Canada for at least one year as Temporary Foreign Workers or International Students, or, (iii) are submitted by skilled workers [...] Federal Skilled Worker applications submitted on or after February 27, 2008, meeting the following criteria shall be placed into processing immediately upon receipt:
-
88.
Aramouni v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 430 - 2011-04-07
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application, pursuant to section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), for judicial review of a March 19, 2010 decision of a visa officer at the Canadian Embassy in Warsaw, Poland denying the application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] He submitted an application for permanent residence in the skilled worker category on March 24, 2004 to the Embassy of Canada in Damascus. [...] [15] It is clear that the assessment of an application for permanent residence under the federal skilled worker class is an exercise of a visa officer’s discretion, and as such it attracts a standard of reasonableness: Roberts v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 518, at para 15; Persaud v Canada
-
89.
Yasmin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 383 - 2018-04-09
Federal Court Decisions76 (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: [...] (a) the number of applications by skilled workers as members of the federal skilled worker class currently being processed; [...] (b) the number of skilled workers projected to become permanent residents according to the report to Parliament referred to in section 94 of the Act; and
-
90.
Odufodunrin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 736 - 2021-07-12
Federal Court Decisions[1] Kit Ayodeji Odufodunrin is a Nigerian citizen who applied for permanent residency as a skilled worker at the invitation of the Canadian government, following his acceptance into the express entry pool of candidates. [...] Selection of Permanent Residents Sélection des résidents permanents [...] Federal Skilled Worker Class Travailleurs qualifiés (fédéral) Skilled workers
-
91.
Hameed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 271 - 2008-02-29
Federal Court Decisions[19] The Respondent submits that the Applicant failed to achieve enough points under either scheme to qualify for a permanent resident visa as a member of the skilled worker category. [...] There is no doubt in my mind that the assessment of an Applicant for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class is an exercise of discretion that should be given a high degree of deference. [...] [29] Sections 73 through 85 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, above, govern the assessment of applications for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class.
-
92.
De Guzman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 1113 - 2010-11-17
Federal Court DecisionsThe officer rejected the applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker class on the basis that she did not receive the required number of points under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (the “Regulations”). [...] [4] The applicant filed her application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker class in July 2004, at which time she submitted all relevant documents regarding her education and that of her husband, as well as regarding the family members in Canada. [...] The application for judicial review of a decision of the First Secretary, Immigration, of the Canadian Embassy in Makati City, Philippines, rejecting the applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker class, is dismissed.
-
93.
Lal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 717 - 2017-07-24
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is a judicial review, pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act], of an Officer’s decision dated December 20, 2016 rejecting the Applicants’ application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Trades [FST] class. [...] Your application for permanent residence in the Federal Skilled Trades Class was assessed against the requirements (pass/fail) based on the following skilled trade occupation specified in your application: National Occupational Classification (NOC) 7241 Electrician. [...] (3) A foreign national is a member of the federal skilled trades class if
-
94.
Chugh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 296 - 2010-03-12
Federal Court Decisions[6] In September 2007 the Applicant made an application for permanent residence in Canada under the skilled worker class as a computer instructor. [...] [14] The awarding and calculation of points to merit a permanent residence visa under the skilled worker category is a matter for a visa officer to assess; not the Court. [...] 1. The Visa Officer’s decision refusing the application for a permanent resident visa under the skilled worker category made on May 11, 2009 is quashed;
-
95.
Venkata v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 423 - 2017-04-28
Federal Court Decisions76 (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: [...] (a) the number of applications by skilled workers as members of the federal skilled worker class currently being processed; [...] (b) the number of skilled workers projected to become permanent residents according to the report to Parliament referred to in section 94 of the Act; and
-
96.
Singh Sran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 791 - 2012-06-25
Federal Court DecisionsAccordingly, the officer found that the applicant would not qualify as a skilled worker. [...] a) la personne qui présente la demande est devenue résident permanent; [...] The OP 7b makes it clear that the federal skilled worker class and the provincial nominee class are two different categories with different criteria.
-
97.
Dimgba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 14 - 2018-01-09
Federal Court DecisionsOn November 11, 2014, she submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the Skilled Worker Class. [...] 75 (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] Skilled workers Qualité (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if
-
98.
Hassani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2006 FC 1283 - 2006-10-25
Federal Court Decisions75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: [...] There is no doubt in my mind that the assessment of an Applicant for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker Class is an exercise of discretion that should be given a high degree of deference.
-
99.
Probortona v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 1461 - 2021-12-22
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of a decision of a visa officer (the “Officer”) of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) dated October 9, 2020, refusing the Applicant’s application for permanent residence under the Federal Skilled Worker program. [...] Federal Skilled Worker Class Class 75 (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to [...] Skilled workers (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if [...] (e) they have submitted one of the following:
-
100.
Ijaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 67 - 2015-01-16
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant, Minaa Ijaz, is a citizen of Pakistan who applied for permanent residence status in Canada as a federal skilled worker (FSW) pursuant to s. 12(2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27, (IRPA) and s. 75(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (IRP [...] Federal Skilled Worker Class Travailleurs qualifiés (fédéral) Skilled workers [...] 76. (1) For the purpose of determining whether a skilled worker, as a member of the federal skilled worker class, will be able to become economically established in Canada, they must be assessed on the basis of the following criteria: