1,035 result(s)
-
951.
Distrimedic Inc. v. Dispill Inc. - 2013 FC 1043 - 2013-10-15
Federal Court DecisionsFrance Morissette is offered as someone experienced as a user of the relevant devices, i.e. as a skilled worker in the art who can comment on and who understands the problems to be overcome and how different remedial devices might work. [...] It was recommended to 12 of the 14 residences with which she worked. The other two residences prefer to use the unidose system. [...] 1) on the basis of the common knowledge of the worker skilled in the art to which the patent relates;
-
952.
Alibey v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2004 FC 305 - 2004-03-02
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision ("Decision") of a Visa Officer ("Visa Officer"), dated April 12, 2002, dismissing the application of Jude Alibey ("Applicant") for permanent residence. [...] [13] By letter dated April 12, 2002, the Visa Officer refused the Applicant's application for permanent residence on the ground that the Applicant was unable to meet the requirements for admission to Canada. [...] [16] Every person seeking permission to establish permanent residence in Canada as an immigrant must undergo a "medical examination" by a "medical officer."
-
953.
Abdelsalam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2020 FC 196 - 2020-02-04
Federal Court DecisionsAn addendum to the PRRA Decision was provided on March 5, 2019, in light of evidence included in the Applicants’ application for Permanent Resident status on H&C grounds. [...] [10] On March 8, 2019, the same Officer refused their applications for Permanent Resident status on H&C grounds. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2143-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
954.
Bidgoly v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2022 FC 283 - 2022-03-01
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Bidgoly [Applicant] seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration [Minister] to render a decision on his permanent resident [PR] application under the Express Entry program. [...] A further review on August 31, 2018 completed a criminality assessment and recommended the Applicant for the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] Class. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-844-21 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
955.
Shah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 537 - 2018-05-24
Federal Court DecisionsThey then applied for permanent residence in Canada based on H&C grounds. [...] [25] The Officer noted that the H&C process is not designed to eliminate hardship, nor is it meant as an alternative route to obtaining permanent residence in Canada, but rather a mechanism for relief in exceptional cases. [...] In this case, the Applicants sought permanent residence status without applying for that status from their country of origin, as would otherwise be required.
-
956.
Walcott v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 415 - 2011-04-05
Federal Court DecisionsIn the second decision, the Officer denied the Applicant’s request to have his application for permanent residence processed from within Canada on humanitarian and compassionate grounds (“H&C”). [...] [24] As for the inability to apply under the skilled worker program in Canada, she noted that being absent without leave from the U.S. military is not a crime in Canada and that even if convicted in the U.S., he would not be inadmissible to Canada. [...] The main reason that the Applicant even found himself in a position to be applying for permanent residence from within Canada was his reason for leaving the United States military in the first place.
-
957.
Hinton v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 7 - 2008-01-04
Federal Court DecisionsAs a consequence, should the Court ultimately declare that the regulation in question is ultra vires, and that members of the proposed class are entitled to have their applications for permanent residence assessed in accordance with the criteria set out in the Immigration Act, the Minister will be obliged to act [...] If Mr. Tihomorovs succeeded, then those whose applications for permanent residence had not yet been processed would be processed under the same regulations. [...] [51] Excluded from the class are the 10 individuals referred to in paragraph [29] hereof, as well as those covered by an amicable settlement, being certain persons who before 1 January 2002 submitted applications seeking an immigrant visa in the skilled worker, self employed, entrepreneur and investor categories, excluding
-
958.
Arshad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 510 - 2018-05-15
Federal Court Decisions[3] The Applicant, Mahboob Arshad, is a 41 year old citizen of Pakistan who became a Canadian permanent resident on June 28, 1991. [...] [10] The Officer found that the Applicant’s contractor skills would allow him to find work in Pakistan where he would not face language barriers because he speaks Punjabi. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3893-17 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
959.
Dhaliwal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 1249 - 2023-09-18
Federal Court DecisionsShe obtained permanent residence in Canada in 2010 after landing with her ex-husband under the Skilled Worker Class. [...] The Applicant’s son is a Canadian citizen but resides in India with the Applicant’s husband and her husband’s parents. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-6608-22 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
960.
Bansal v. Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council - 2019 FC 1273 - 2019-10-09
Federal Court Decisionsthe Government of Alberta, showing that Bansal has engaged in professional misconduct as an RCIC – specifically, he actively recruited foreign workers abroad, charged them significant fees to obtain employment in Canada and promised that they would obtain permanent residency and could then bring their families to Canada. [...] There is no evidence that Mr. Bansal has long term arrangements or relationships with clients who have depended upon his skill and expertise over a lengthy period of time, as was the case in Kumar and Visconti. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5458-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
961.
Boldt v. College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants - 2023 FC 802 - 2023-06-07
Federal Court Decisions[9] When looking for a job on his open work permit, ZC expressed an interest in starting a business with BL to qualify under Manitoba’s Provincial Nominee Program [PNP] Skilled Worker Program. [...] ZC and RHJ divorced in 2013, in part due to concerns about the effect of these charges on RHJ’s ongoing permanent residence application in Canada, but continued to reside together in Winnipeg. [...] [13] On June 11, 2017, RHJ’s permanent residence application was refused.
-
962.
Garcia Diaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 321 - 2021-04-13
Federal Court Decisions[3] In 2016, Ms Diaz Rodriguez applied to sponsor the applicant to come to Canada as a permanent resident. [...] He was, however, listed as a non-accompanying dependent on Ms Diaz Rodriguez’s application for permanent residency. [...] She submitted a second application for permanent residence on his behalf in 2016.
-
963.
He v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 1027 - 2021-10-04
Federal Court Decisions[1] The Applicant, Yunying He (“Ms. He”) has twice been refused a work permit and temporary resident visa to come to Canada for work as a child caregiver for a family with two school-aged children. [...] [6] Ms. He applied for a work permit and temporary resident visa (“TRV”) in August 2018. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: IMM-2246-20 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
964.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2020 FC 328 - 2020-03-03
Federal Court DecisionsIn 2005, he was admitted to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), where he continues to reside. [...] [4] Mr. Singh is a citizen of India who became a permanent resident of Canada in 1987. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2357-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
965.
Braud v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2020 FC 132 - 2020-01-27
Federal Court DecisionsIn May 2015, sponsored by Mr. Moreau, Ms. Braud applied for permanent residence in the Spouse or Common-Law Partner in Canada class. [...] [63] Once again, and despite the arguments skillfully presented by her lawyer, I do not share Ms. Braud’s reading of the reasons for the Decision. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2119-19 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
966.
Charkaoui, Re - 2003 FC 1419 - 2003-12-05
Federal Court Decisions1. The legal status of a permanent resident 59 First of all, it is important to note that the Charter itself distinguishes between the right of Canadian citizens and the rights of permanent residents. [...] If the permanent resident is not in any of these situations, he may remain in Canada. [...] Is it between permanent residents threatened with inadmissibility for reasons based on protected information and permanent residents threatened with inadmissibility for reasons not based on protected information?
-
967.
D'Souza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 264 - 2017-03-06
Federal Court DecisionsCanada [CIC] dated June 2, 2016, refusing the Applicant’s application for an exemption from the requirements of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27, based on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds, to allow his application for permanent residence to be processed from within Canada. [...] After completing his studies in India, Mr. D’Souza spent considerable time as a foreign worker in Saudi Arabia and Israel. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-2782-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
968.
Dwyer v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) - 2020 FC 919 - 2020-09-22
Federal Court Decisions[4] Mr. Dwyer is a citizen of Jamaica; he arrived in Canada in December 2000 at the age of 14, having been sponsored as a permanent resident by his mother. [...] Instruction Guide 5291 (Applying for Permanent Residence from Within Canada – Humanitarian and Compassionate Consideration in manual chapter IP 5 – 3.2), which states: [...] If you are under a removal order and decide to submit an application for permanent residence based on H&C, it will not delay your removal from Canada.
-
969.
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Slimani - 2019 FC 39 - 2019-01-11
Federal Court DecisionsOn July 23, 2004, he became a permanent resident of Canada as a dependent of his father, who was admitted to Canada as a skilled worker. [...] On this point, it noted the positive factors that emerged from the respondent’s testimony: (1) he took full responsibility for the bad decisions he had made; (2) his remorse appeared to be genuine; (3) he had participated in workshops at the detention centre, which had allowed him to learn certain skills; (4) he had stopped [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-1916-18 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
970.
Truong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 422 - 2017-04-28
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant Mr. Lap Trung Truong wished to sponsor his spouse, Mrs. Thuy Linh Thy Nguyen, for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [10] Mr. Truong applied to sponsor his wife and step-daughter for permanent residence in May 2011. [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3644-16 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
971.
El Dor v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1406 - 2015-12-21
Federal Court DecisionsShe submitted an application for a permanent resident visa in the “Quebec‑selected skill worker” class to settle in Canada with her husband and two minor children, Rayan and Jad. In October 2013 as part of Ms. El Dor’s application review, Jad, who is suffering from autism spectrum disorder, underwent a cognitive assessment [...] Ms. El Dor stressed that this assessment amounted to denying permanent residence in Canada to all persons who could require a special‑needs education in the country, regardless of their financial situation. [...] The decision of the officer who denied her application for permanent residence on health grounds is transparent and intelligible, and falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law.
-
972.
César Nguesso v. Canada (Citzenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 880 - 2015-07-17
Federal Court Decisions[47] These principles were also applied in the context of decisions about permanent residence applications and inadmissibility. [...] In that case, a visa officer had refused a permanent residence application and declared the applicant inadmissible for security reasons. [...] In Ulybin v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 629, [2013] FCJ No 661, a permanent residence application was refused on the ground that the applicant had been convicted in Spain of offences in connection with a construction accident resulting in the death of a worker.
-
973.
Rodriguez Zambrano v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 481 - 2008-04-15
Federal Court Decisions[7] On March 9, 2006, the applicants applied for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds. [...] The officer placed particular emphasis on the applicants’ demonstrated ability to establish themselves and their transferable skills. [...] The burden which the applicant had to discharge was whether the Immigration Officer's decision not to grant her an exemption for the inland processing of her permanent residence application was unreasonable.
-
974.
Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. Canada Post Corporation - 2016 FC 252 - 2016-02-26
Federal Court DecisionsCANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS Applicant and CANADA POST CORPORATION [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: T-2574-14 STYLE OF CAUSE: [...] CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS v CANADA POST CORPORATION PLACE OF HEARING:
-
975.
Brown v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 452 - 2018-04-26
Federal Court DecisionsIn January 2015, he obtained a study permit and came to Canada to attend school in the hopes of eventually obtaining permanent residence. [...] As this Court stated in Tabingo v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 377 at paragraph 99, with respect to the skilled worker class, “[t]he ability to immigrate, particularly as a member of an economic class, is not among the fundamental choices relating to personal autonomy which would engage section [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-4098-17 STYLE OF CAUSE: