1,035 result(s)
-
276.
Samiullah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 836 - 2013-07-31
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant seeks to set aside an August 27, 2012 decision of a Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) service delivery agent to return his application for permanent residence as a Federal Skilled Worker in Canada without processing. [...] [2] In 2004, the applicant applied for permanent residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker (FSW). [...] The Canadian visa office in Buffalo, New York issued him a permanent resident visa on July 5, 2006.
-
277.
Gulati v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 451 - 2010-04-27
Federal Court DecisionsThe officer refused the applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker class. [...] [4] The applicant applied to be considered as a skilled worker in an occupation with the NOC code of 6212: Food Services Supervisor (“NOC 6212”). [...] Accordingly, she refused the application for permanent residence. BACKGROUND
-
278.
Parssian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 304 - 2016-03-10
Federal Court Decisions[3] The applicant is a citizen of the United States of America who applied for permanent residence in Canada as a member of the CEC in July of 2014. [...] (a) they have acquired in Canada, within the three years before the date on which their application for permanent residence is made, at least one year of full-time work experience, or the equivalent in part-time work experience, in one or more occupations that are listed in Skill Type 0 Management Occupations or Skill Level [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD Docket: IMM-3841-15 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
279.
Carrillo Seijo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 184 - 2011-02-16
Federal Court Decisions[1] Cesar Enrique Carrillo Seijo applied for permanent residence in Canada as a Federal Skilled Worker. [...] Mr. Seijo applied for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker program in February of 2009. [...] [8] Mr. Seijo and his wife did not attend the interview, and the visa officer subsequently refused the application for permanent residency.
-
280.
Samuel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 223 - 2010-02-25
Federal Court DecisionsThe officer who conducted the interview apparently regarded the skill of taking care of small children as distinguishable from the skill of supervising daycare workers. [...] all or almost all of the workers involved in the labour dispute are not Canadian citizens or permanent residents and the hiring of workers to replace the workers involved in the labour dispute is not prohibited by the Canadian law applicable in the province where the workers involved in the labour dispute are employed; [...] The Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7 18.1(4) The Federal Court may grant relief under subsection (3) if it is satisfied that the federal board, commission or other tribunal
-
281.
Trivedi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 422 - 2010-04-19
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20100419 Docket: IMM-4571-09 [...] The principal Applicant applied for permanent residence as a skilled worker in October 2004. [...] The second paragraph of that letter stated: “The selection criteria are clearly defined and your eligibility as a Skilled Worker will be assessed on the basis of the evidence provided by you.”
-
282.
Brocor Construction Ltd. v. Canada (Employment and Social Development) - 2019 FC 420 - 2019-04-08
Federal Court Decisions[3] The TFW Program enables Canadian employers to hire foreign workers on a temporary basis to fill immediate skill and labour shortages when Canadian citizens and permanent residents are not available to fill the positions. [...] (b) whether the employment of the foreign national will or is likely to result in the development or transfer of skills and knowledge for the benefit of Canadian citizens or permanent residents; [...] FEDERAL COURT SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-3009-18 STYLE OF CAUSE:
-
283.
Cabatu Espinosa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 609 - 2009-06-10
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Jose Cabatu Espinosa, a citizen of the Philippines, applied to become a permanent resident of Canada as a skilled worker. [...] [6] Under the Regulations, an applicant for permanent residence is entitled to be awarded 4 points for adaptability if his or her spouse would have been awarded 20 or 22 points in the “education” category if the spouse were applying directly as a skilled worker (s. 83(2)(b) – provisions cited are set out in Annex “A”). [...] 83(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), an officer shall evaluate the educational credentials of a skilled worker's accompanying spouse or accompanying common-law partner as if the spouse or common-law partner were a skilled worker, and shall award points to the skilled worker as follows:
-
284.
Mannil v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 70 - 2014-01-21
Federal Court Decisions[2] The Applicants seek judicial review of the refusal of a Service Delivery Agent [Agent] to process their applications for permanent residence under the federal skilled worker class [PR application] because they fell outside of their annual National Occupation Classifications cap [annual cap] imposed by the MI-2 issued [...] This new instruction re-opened the application process for all categories under the federal skilled workers class. [...] [28] Although neither party presented any evidence as to what would normally consist of a reasonable delay in the PR application process for the federal skilled worker class, in Liang, above (at para 29), this Court found that 6 to 12 months was a reasonable delay within which such applicants could expect to receive a
-
285.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 814 - 2012-06-26
Federal Court DecisionsOn July 20, 2009, he applied for a permanent resident visa under the “federal skilled worker class” as described in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002‑227 [Regulations]. [...] [4] In a decision dated August 25, 2011, the Officer refused the Applicant’s application because he had failed to earn the minimum 67 points needed to qualify for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] In support of your application for permanent residence in Canada, you submitted a letter of employment offer from . . . .
-
286.
Kapasi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 1070 - 2017-11-27
Federal Court Decisions[1] Mr. Kapasi [the Applicant] seeks judicial review of the Visa Officer’s [the Officer] refusal of his application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] His permanent resident card expired in 2010, and in anticipation of the decision under review, he renounced his Canadian permanent resident status in early 2017. [...] [3] In December 2014, he applied under NOC 1113 of the Federal Skilled Worker Class [FSWC] program.
-
287.
Ling v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 747 - 2005-05-31
Federal Court DecisionsIn his decision dated May 3, 2004, the visa officer refused Ms. Ling's application for permanent residence in Canada under the skilled worker class. [...] At the time, she submitted her application for permanent residence in Canada, she was enrolled in a Bachelor of Education Program in Hong Kong and was the principal at Shek Kei Catholic Primary School. [...] Ms. Ling's application for permanent residence under the skilled worker category was accompanied by an offer for arranged employment for the position of
-
288.
Ebi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 13 - 2015-01-06
Federal Court Decisionsto subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA], of the decision of an Immigration Officer [the Officer] refusing the Applicant’s request for a substituted evaluation, and consequently, her application for permanent residence in Canada under the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] class. [...] 87.4 (1) An application by a foreign national for a permanent resident visa as a member of the prescribed class of federal skilled workers that was made before February 27, 2008 is terminated if, before March 29, 2012, it has not been established by an officer, in accordance with the regulations, whether the applicant meets [...] Selection of Permanent Residents Family reunification Sélection des résidents permanents
-
289.
Buttar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 984 - 2010-10-01
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20101001 Docket: IMM-1703-10 [...] S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the “Act”), by Jatinder Singh Buttar (the “applicant”), for judicial review of a decision by a visa officer (the “officer”) at the Canadian High Commission in New Delhi, dated January 29, 2010, whereby the officer rejected his application for permanent residence as a member of the skilled worker class. [...] In December 2003, he applied for a permanent resident visa in Canada under the federal skilled worker class and requested that his application be considered under the occupation of a Financial Auditor and Accountant (NOC Code 1111), and included two letters from his employer, the Anjala Co-operative Sugar Mills Limited (the
-
290.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 992 - 2007-10-01
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (IRPA) for judicial review of a decision by an immigration officer dated May 3, 2006, which refused the applicant’s application for permanent residence as a skilled worker. [...] On September 9, 2004, he applied for permanent residence in Canada, as a member of the skilled worker class. [...] [27] The standard of review applicable to the officer’s finding with respect to an application for permanent residence within the skilled worker category is patent unreasonableness (see Kniazeva above).
-
291.
Ngo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 1343 - 2007-12-20
Federal Court Decisions[1] Ngoc Uyen Nhi Ngo is a citizen of Vietnam who applied for permanent residence in Canada. [...] While her application was treated as an application in the skilled worker class, Ms. Ngo requested humanitarian and compassionate consideration because she was the last member of her nuclear family remaining in Vietnam. [...] [5] I preface these reasons by observing that this is the second time that the Court has set aside a negative decision regarding Ms. Ngo’s application for permanent residence.
-
292.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 509 - 2016-05-06
Federal Court DecisionsGurbinder Singh, seeks judicial review pursuant to section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act] of a decision of an Immigration Officer at the High Commission of Canada in London, United Kingdom [the Officer] who refused his application for a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker. [...] [9] The Officer refused the application for a permanent resident visa. [...] [23] The onus remains on the applicant to demonstrate his eligibility for the permanent resident visa.
-
293.
Chen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 611 - 2016-06-01
Federal Court Decisions[5] In 2014, the Applicant decided to apply for permanent resident status as a member of the CEC. When individuals apply for permanent residence as a member of the CEC, they are evaluated according to the criteria identified in subsection 87.1(2) of the Regulations. [...] • May perform the same duties as workers supervised (AR at 48) [9] Along with his application for permanent residence, the Applicant submitted a letter from the President of East Link, who outlined some of the Applicant’s professional experience: [...] (a) they have acquired in Canada, within the three years before the date on which their application for permanent residence is made, at least one year of full-time work experience, or the equivalent in part-time work experience, in one or more occupations that are listed in Skill Type 0 Management Occupations or Skill Level
-
294.
Kotler v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 FC 1123 - 2011-09-30
Federal Court DecisionsShe later filed an application for permanent residence in the skilled worker category which was approved in principle but was refused on June 26, 2001 after she failed to appear for the interview. [...] His subsequent application for permanent residence in the skilled worker category was refused on October 19, 2010. [...] [6] On September 8, 2006, the applicants filed their application for permanent residence status on H&C grounds.
-
295.
Kunkel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 920 - 2008-07-28
Federal Court Decisions[1] Edward James Kunkel (the Applicant) seeks Judicial Review pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (the Act) of a decision of a visa officer (the Visa Officer) dated 9 January, 2007 wherein she denied the Applicant a permanent resident visa as a skilled worker (the [...] [16] As such, the Visa Officer held that the Applicant did not qualify as a skilled worker. [...] Skilled workers (2) A foreign national is a skilled worker if (a) within the 10 years preceding the date of their application for a permanent resident visa, they have at least one year of continuous full-time employment experience, as described in subsection 80(7), or the equivalent in continuous part-time employment in one
-
296.
Iqbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 825 - 2016-07-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] An Immigration Officer [Officer] rejected the Applicant’s application for permanent residence as a member of the Skilled Worker Class and held that the Applicant is inadmissible to Canada for misrepresentation under paragraph 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA]. [...] He applied for permanent residence status under the Federal Skilled Worker Class (NOC 1123) in May 2014. [...] This could have contributed to your approval for a permanent resident visa.
-
297.
Akbar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 921 - 2015-07-28
Federal Court Decisions[3] The Applicant, a citizen of Pakistan, applied for permanent residence in the Federal Skilled Worker [FSW] category as a teacher. [...] If admitted to Canada as a permanent resident, she will be eligible for and will likely require a combination of health services and social services. [...] The Applicant’s establishment in Canada is based on her obtaining employment as a member of the Federal Skilled Worker class, which makes speculative her proposed employment so that she can personally home-school her daughter.
-
298.
Belkacem v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2008 FC 375 - 2008-03-25
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review from a decision by visa officer Karine Roy-Tremblay of the Canadian Embassy at Rabat in Morocco, denying the applicant’s application for permanent residence in the class “skilled workers – Quebec”. [...] Accordingly, she rejected the permanent residence application on June 25, 2007 by the following letter: [...] (a) Did the visa officer err in dismissing the applicant’s permanent residence application?
-
299.
Sharma v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 1253 - 2015-11-05
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the First Secretary (Immigration) of the High Commission of Canada in New Delhi, India, dated February 15, 2014, wherein the First Secretary refused the applicant’s application for a permanent resident visa in Canada under the federal skilled worker category [...] He submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada under the federal skilled worker class. [...] This employment was used to fulfill the work experience requirement under the federal skilled worker program.
-
300.
Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 180 - 2017-02-13
Federal Court Decisions[11] Subsection 87.1(2) of the Regulations specifies the requirements for members of the CEC to become permanent residents of Canada: [...] [19] The Applicant submits in reply that she submitted her application for permanent residence under the PNP class, not under the CEC as stated by the Respondent. [...] When nominated under the Provincial Nominee Program through Express Entry, [she] must also meet the program requirements for at least one of the federal immigration programs (Federal Skilled Worker Program, Federal Skilled Trades Program, and/or Canadian Experience Class).