1,035 result(s)
-
976.
Chaudhry v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2003 FCT 229 - 2003-02-25
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of Foreign Service Officer J. Crowther, denying Mr. Chaudry's application for permanent residence as an independent immigrant. [...] [12] The Canadian workplace has shortages in key fields including skilled construction workers. [...] Highly skilled workers such as the applicant are required to maintain Canadian economic prosperity.
-
977.
Dragan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2003 FCT 211 - 2003-02-21
Federal Court Decisions(a) a skilled worker, in the case of a foreign national described in paragraph (2)(a); [...] 1, 2002 for an immigrant visa and has not, before April 1, 2003, been awarded the number of units of assessment required by the former Regulations, they must obtain a minimum of 70 points based on the factors set out in paragraph 76(1)(a) to become a permanent resident as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] beginning from April 1, 2003, such applicants will be assessed under the new Regulations but will have to obtain a minimum of 70 points (as opposed to the general pass-mark of 75) to qualify in the federal skilled worker class.
-
978.
Heo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2003 FCT 90 - 2003-01-28
Federal Court DecisionsIn his decision, dated July 26, 2001, the Applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada was refused. [...] [2] The Applicant, a citizen of South Korea, applied for permanent residence in Canada in the independent, skilled worker category. [...] if admitted as a permanent resident, Mr. Singh's demands for health services were likely
-
979.
Saleem v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2003 FCT 70 - 2003-01-23
Federal Court DecisionsIn his decision dated February 19, 2001, the Visa Officer refused the Applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [2] The Applicant, a citizen of Pakistan, applied for permanent residence in Canada in April 1997, under the independent skilled worker category. [...] [16] He applied in the capacity of an independent skilled worker. He was required to comply with Schedule I of the Regulations.
-
980.
Perelmuter v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1188 - 2002-11-15
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the visa officer at the High Commission in London, England, dated June 7, 2001, wherein the visa officer refused the applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [3] The applicant is a citizen of Israel who applied for permanent residence in Canada as an independent skilled worker under the category of Food Processing Engineer, National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2148.4. [...] [6] The applicant's application for permanent residence was denied. This is the judicial review of the decision of the visa officer.
-
981.
Noman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1169 - 2002-11-12
Federal Court DecisionsMr. Noman also plans to reside in Toronto. [3] In April of 1999, Mr. Noman submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada to the Canadian High Commission in Singapore. [...] His application was made pursuant to the Independent Selection Criteria for skilled workers, as a "Civil Engineer" (National Occupation Classification ("NOC") # 2131). [...] In his letter refusing Mr. Noman's application for permanent residency, Officer Chong states:
-
982.
Qin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1154 - 2002-11-08
Federal Court Decisions1, 2002 for an immigrant visa and has not, before April 1, 2003, been awarded the number of units of assessment required by the former Regulations, they must obtain a minimum of 70 points based on the factors set out in paragraph 76(1)(a) to become a permanent resident as a member of the federal skilled worker class. [...] [3] The applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada be referred to another visa officer for redetermination in accordance with the law; [...] [4] The redetermination of the applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada be made on or before March 31, 2003.
-
983.
Panov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1055 - 2002-10-10
Federal Court Decisions[2] The applicant is a 36 year old citizen of Russia who applied for permanent residence in Canada as an Independent Skilled Worker under the category of Electronics Engineer, as classified in the National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2133. [...] [10] Under these assessments, the applicant did not have the 70 units that are required for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [11] The applicant was advised that his application for permanent residence in Canada was refused by letter dated July 12, 2000.
-
984.
Huang v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1052 - 2002-10-09
Federal Court DecisionsIn her decision dated June 4, 2001, the Visa Officer refused the Applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [3] He made an application for permanent residence in Canada through the Hong Kong office of the Canadian Consulate General on July 14, 1999. [...] He applied as a member of the "independent, skilled worker" class and indicated that his intended occupation in Canada would be "computer programmer".
-
985.
Kalam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 832 - 2002-07-31
Federal Court Decisions[2] Mr. Kalam is a resident of Bangladesh who applied for permanent residence in Canada in the independent skilled worker category. [...] He did not know if this organization was actually hiring nor the skills and qualifications it would be seeking. [...] FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
-
986.
Anandappa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 701 - 2002-06-20
Federal Court Decisions[9] I add the applicant on or about July 2001 applied through the Canadian Embassy in Buffalo for permanent residency in Canada in the independent category band as a skilled worker- a Chef. [...] One factor in that prioritization may be the applicant's outstanding application for permanent residence in Canada, and how imminent the visa officer's decision is forthcoming. [...] FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Date: 20020620 Docket: IMM-2464-02 BETWEEN:
-
987.
Vandi V. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 515 - 2002-05-06
Federal Court Decisions[1] The applicant seeks judicial review of a decision of the visa officer dated August 22, 2000, in which the visa officer refused the applicant's application for permanent residence as an independent or skilled worker. [...] He applied for permanent residence in Canada as an interior designer and was interviewed by the officer on March 9, 2000. [...] I had the opportunity to interview you in July 1998 for a Student Authorization and again March 2000 for permanent residence.
-
988.
Benoit v. Canada - 2002 FCT 243 - 2002-03-07
Federal Court DecisionsPursuant to s.57 of the Federal Court Act - and - THE CANADIAN TAXPAYERS FEDERATION [...] That is one of -- that is one of the elders that is known for those things, those skills. [...] Pursuant to s. 57 of the Federal Court Act - and The Canadian Taxpayers Federation
-
989.
Sandhar v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 154 - 2002-02-12
Federal Court Decisions[3] In his application for permanent residence the applicant indicated his intended occupation in Canada was that of an assistant manager. [...] For the same reasons, the fact that the sponsoring brother in Canada had no prior restaurant experience before acquiring his restaurant franchise is irrelevant to the officer's assessment of the applicant seeking permanent residency in Canada as a permanent resident as a family business applicant. [...] FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF SOLICITORS AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD
-
990.
Chau v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 107 - 2002-01-29
Federal Court Decisions[6] In July 1996, the applicant made an application for permanent residence in Canada under the Deferred Removal Orders Class ("DROC") category. [...] [28] The burden which the applicant had to discharge was whether the Immigration Officer's decision not to grant her an exemption for the inland processing of her permanent residence application was unreasonable. [...] FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF SOLICITORS AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD
-
991.
Singh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 102 - 2002-01-28
Federal Court Decisions[3] The applicant, Mr. Singh lives in India and applied for a permanent residence visa at the Canadian High Commission in New Delhi, India. [...] [4] The applicant, Mr. Singh applied for permanent residence in Canada pursuant to an approved family business job offer, which was offered by his uncle, the applicant, Mr. Bhogal. [...] On the applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada, he stated his intended occupation to be a shift supervisor.
-
992.
Xue v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2001 FCT 1403 - 2001-12-18
Federal Court DecisionsHe applied for permanent residence in Canada in the self-employed category. [...] [5] The applicable standard of review for decisions of visa officers on application for permanent residence was reviewed by Madam Justice Reed of this Court in Hao v. Canada (The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] F.C.J. No. 296. [...] Even if I were to accept each and every one of the applicant's submissions on these issues and apply the maximum number of units available to each, the total would be insufficient to provide the applicant with the requisite 70 units needed for permanent residence.
-
993.
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Baumgartner - 2001 FCT 970 - 2001-08-31
Federal Court Decisionsd) the volunteers' names would have to be submitted to the Honved ministry in order to determine if the recruit could be dispensed with as a skilled worker in a vital war related industry or as a trained soldier; [...] "Landing" was defined at subsection 2(n) of that Act as meaning "the lawful admission of an immigrant to Canada for permanent residence." [...] Due to these circumstances, he therefore did not lawfully acquire permanent residence, nor Canadian Citizenship.
-
994.
Avanesyan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2001 FCT 663 - 2001-06-15
Federal Court Decisions[1] This is an application for judicial review under section 82.1(2) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-2, of the decision of the visa officer, Marie Desbois, dated March 20, 2000, denying the applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [3] The applicant, Samvel Avanesyan is a citizen of Russia who submitted an application for permanent residence in Canada to the Canadian Embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina on July 19, 1999. [...] [20] Although the applicant submitted his application for permanent residence eight months before the interview, he had not researched the employment market in Canada and had little idea of how he would find a job.
-
995.
Mulholland v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2001 FCT 597 - 2001-06-06
Federal Court DecisionsFederal Court Reports Mulholland v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (T.D.) [2001] 4 F.C. 99 [...] citizens and permanent residents with their close relatives from abroad, it is consistent, in my opinion, with a large and liberal interpretation of the values underlying this legislation and its purposes to presume that Parliament also placed a high value on keeping citizens and permanent residents together with [...] 4(2) Subject to any other Act of Parliament, a Canadian citizen and a permanent resident have a right to remain in Canada except where, in the case of a permanent resident, it is established that the person is a person described in subsection 27(1).
-
996.
Burcatii v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2001 FCT 486 - 2001-05-16
Federal Court Decisions[2] The Applicant, a Moldovian national, applied for permanent residence in Canada at the Canadian Embassy in Bucarest on October 21, 1998. [...] [3] On July 13, 2000, the visa officer refused the Applicant's application for permanent residence in Canada on the ground that the Applicant had failed to obtain the minimum number of units of assessment required. [...] [13] In his application for permanent residence, the Applicant indicated that he wrote, read and spoke French "well".
-
997.
Mo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2001 FCT 66 - 2001-02-14
Federal Court DecisionsIn her decision, the visa officer refused the applicant's permanent residence application on the ground that the applicant's son, Kok Ho Wong, was medically inadmissible. [...] [3] The applicant applied for permanent residence status under the Investor Class on February 26, 1997. [...] [12] The applicant cites Fei v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 F.C. 274 (F.C.T.D.) in which Justice Heald reviewed a refusal for permanent residence based upon medical inadmissibility.
-
998.
Bhardwaj v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2000-08-24
Federal Court Decisions[3] Over the years, he has submitted various applications for permanent residence in Canada. [...] [5] On November 25, 1998, the applicant was interviewed with respect to his application for permanent residence in Canada by the visa officer in New Delhi. [...] [10] Did the visa officer err in law or breach a principle of procedural fairness or natural justice in refusing the applicant"s application for permanent residence in Canada?
-
999.
Mahmood v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2000-08-23
Federal Court Decisions[1] In December, 1994 Zia Mahmood, a permanent resident in Canada, filed an undertaking to sponsor the admission of his sister, Shahnila Mazhar, a citizen and resident of Pakistan. [...] (ii) who is a permanent resident, or (iii) whose application for landing the sponsor may otherwise sponsor; [...] (ii) soit qui est résident permanent, (iii) soit dont il peut par ailleurs parrainer la demande d'établissement.
-
1,000.
Kopyl v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2000-07-19
Federal Court Decisions[1] Peter Kopyl is a 31 year old citizen of Ukraine who applied for permanent residence in Canada as an Independent-Skilled worker under the category of Facility Operations Manager, National Occupational Classification ("NOC") 721.0. [...] [2] He brings this application for judicial review of the decision of Lisa Norris, a visa officer at the Canadian Embassy in Warsaw, Poland, dated June 17, 1999, whereby Ms. Norris determined that Mr. Kopyl"s application for permanent residence in Canada was refused. [...] [6] By a letter dated June 17, 1999, Ms. Norris informed Mr. Kopyl that his application for permanent residence in Canada was refused.