Advanced Search

Falls Management Co. v. Canada (Minister of Health) - 2005 FC 924 - 2005-06-30

In that respect, the provisions dealing with "promotion" are a key feature of the Act. They are found in Part IV, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:   [...]  19. Il est interdit de faire la promotion d'un produit du tabac ou d'un élément de marque d'un produit du tabac, sauf dans la mesure où elle est autorisée par la présente loi ou ses règlements.

Del Zotto v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) - 2005 FC 653 - 2005-05-09

Those requests were amplified by counsel's letter of February 8, 2000 which expressed the view that a full response to the requests for information "will provide a definitive answer as to all Revenue Canada dealings with Mr. DelZotto".   [...]  [...] b) soit dont la divulgation risquerait vraisemblablement de nuire aux activités destinées à faire respecter les lois fédérales ou provinciales ou au déroulement d'enquêtes licites, notamment :

Kathirgamu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 300 - 2005-02-25

Fairness did not require the Board to put the inconsistency to her for comment before drawing its credibility conclusion.   [...]  [46] The applicant raised other issues, but I need not deal with those issues because of my finding with respect to the Board's credibility and implausibility findings.

Esco Corp. v. Quality Steel Foundries Ltd. - 2003 FC 993 - 2003-08-20

He worked mostly on litigation files but spent about 20% of his time dealing with prosecution of patent applications.   [...]  XXII. With respect to the second question, I understand the law to be that colleagues of a tainted lawyer may still act in a file if they establish through clear and cogent evidence that a fair minded reasonably informed member of the public would not conclude that the confidential information imparted or presumed to have

Lafarge Canada Inc. c. La Reine - 2001 FCT 194 - 2001-03-16

The appellant, therefore, would not have had recourse to the method of calculating FST according to the fair market value outlined in Memorandum ET 207. ...   [...]   the manufacturer or producer thereof for his own use, the sale price of the goods shall be deemed to be equal to the sale price that would have been reasonable in the circumstances if the goods had been sold, at the time of the appropriation, to a person with whom the manufacturer or producer was dealing at arm's length.

Wilson v. Canada - 2000-10-27

408(2) Lorsque des parties sont tenues de payer des dépens les unes aux autres, l'officier taxateur peut en faire le rajustement par compensation.   [...]  Notwithstanding that concern, because the appropriateness of the procedure was not raised by the parties, I will deal with the merits of the Crown's motion.

Napa v. Abta Shipping Co. - 1998-11-20

[57] Under this heading it should be noted that it is the part of the defendants" motion dealing with the proper forum which has unquestionably used up most of the time and energy of counsel for the plaintiffs, both in preparing their defence to the motion and at the hearing of it.   [...]  [62] Taking into account all the factors listed in Rule 400(3), and in particular the factors mentioned in Rule 400(3)(a), (c) and (g), it seems fair and reasonable to award the plaintiffs in each of the two cases concerned here their costs at the maximum of column V at Tariff B.

Temple v. Via Rail Canada - 2009 FC 858 - 2009-09-09

[82] That said, this Court in Professional Institute of the Public Service, above, has already decided that an applicant assumes “a fairly heavy burden” in establishing that the federal institution’s designation of a bilingual position “lacks objectivity” (paragraph 53).   [...]  While VIA and complainants have different viewpoints on the extent to which the SM on a given train otherwise deal with passengers, we accept the Corporation’s position that the incumbent is expected to deal extensively with passengers in a public relations’ capacity.   [...]  [...] Federal government offices and Crown corporations across the country must be able to deal with people in either French or English.

Bonner v. Via Rail Canada - 2009 FC 857 - 2009-09-09

[81] That said, this Court in Professional Institute of the Public Service, above, has already decided that an applicant assumes “a fairly heavy burden” in establishing that the federal institution’s designation of a bilingual position “lacks objectivity” (paragraph 53).   [...]  While VIA and complainants have different viewpoints on the extent to which the SM on a given train otherwise deal with passengers, we accept the Corporation’s position that the incumbent is expected to deal extensively with passengers in a public relations’ capacity.   [...]  [...] Federal government offices and Crown corporations across the country must be able to deal with people in either French or English.

Norton v. Via Rail Canada - 2009 FC 704 - 2009-09-09

[80] That said, this Court in Professional Institute of the Public Service, above, has already decided that an applicant assumes “a fairly heavy burden” in establishing that the federal institution’s designation of a bilingual position “lacks objectivity” (paragraph 53).   [...]  While VIA and complainants have different viewpoints on the extent to which the SM on a given train otherwise deal with passengers, we accept the Corporation’s position that the incumbent is expected to deal extensively with passengers in a public relations’ capacity.   [...]  [...] Federal government offices and Crown corporations across the country must be able to deal with people in either French or English.

Philip Morris Products S.A. v. Malboro Canada Limited - 2010 FC 1099 - 2010-11-08

Unlike with many other kinds of products, the cigarette package is something that the consumer deals with several times a day, so the consumer needs to feel comfortable with.   [...]  This is a document designed for ITL representatives to be used in their dealings with retailers, suggesting ITL products as possible substitutes for other manufacturers’ brands.   [...]  I think it is fair to say, and no evidence to the contrary has been filed, that both marks are inherently distinctive and well known.

Abbott Laboratories v. Canada (Health) - 2008 FC 1359 - 2008-12-11

Thus, a Motions Judge will not be found to have erred in law if he or she decides to deal with the motion.   [...]  [24] In the present case we are dealing with crystalline forms of a pharmaceutical chemical, a molecule known as clarithromycin.   [...]  Does that mean that if there is something other possibility, even a fairly remote one, that some other result would follow, I should conclude the result is not inevitable?

Saputo inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2009 FC 1016 - 2009-10-07

[56] With respect to the source of protein in cheese, as the RIAS points out, there is a great deal of variation in international standards.   [...]  [59] The long term growth of the dairy sector was one of the policy issues the Governor in Council had to deal with in enacting the new Regulations.   [...]  [80] On a fair reading of the regulatory scheme as a whole, as amended by the new Regulations, it cannot be said in the Court’s opinion that the essential or dominant purpose of the impugned provisions is to effect an economic transfer from dairy processors to dairy producers.