Advanced Search

Environmental Resource Centre v. Canada (Minister of Environment) - 2001 FCT 1423 - 2001-12-20

b.1) de faire en sorte que les autorités responsables s'acquittent de leurs obligations afin d'éviter tout double emploi dans le processus d'évaluation environnementale;   [...]  c) de faire en sorte que les éventuels effets environnementaux négatifs importants des projets devant être réalisés dans les limites du Canada ou du territoire domanial ne débordent pas ces limites;   [...]  The briefing package will have to make it clear that should Alberta fail to deliver on the strategy, the Minister does not have any legislative authority to deal with that eventuality.

Canada (Attorney General) v. 2431‑9154 Québec Inc. - 2008 FC 976 - 2008-08-29

[9] The Court therefore decided to hear the parties on the merits but asked them to submit written representations on the preliminary issue to indicate how the Supreme Court of Canada deals with situations in which the English and French versions are contradictory on their face.   [...]  7.2 (1) Le ministre ou toute personne concernée peuvent faire appel au Tribunal de la décision rendue en vertu du paragraphe 6.72(4), de l'alinéa 7(7)a) ou du paragraphe 7.1(7); seule une personne concernée peut faire appel de celle rendue en vertu du paragraphe 6.9(8) ou de l'alinéa 7(7)b).   [...]  b) dans le cas d'une décision rendue en vertu du paragraphe 6.9(8) ou de l'alinéa 7(7)b), rejeter l'appel ou y faire droit et substituer sa propre décision à celle en cause.

Teva Canada Limited v. Novartis AG - 2013 FC 141 - 2013-02-19

And, of course, in assisting the court, a “stone cold expert” is necessary to deal with the complex scientific concepts involved.   [...]  This is a fair – albeit not conclusive – predictor that toxicity will not be a serious deterrent to therapeutic use in warm‑blooded animals.   [...]  The former deals with safety and effectiveness. The latter looks at utility, but in the context of inventiveness.

Khadr v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2008 FC 549 - 2008-04-29

As stated in Kindler at paragraph 160, “... it differs from the criminal process in purpose and procedure and, most importantly, in the factors which render it fair.   [...]  [43] The public interest in disclosure in section 38.06 exceeds the public interest in the fair trial rights of the individual concerned.   [...]  There is a great deal of repetition of the same information as the content of messages received by one Canadian agency or department was circulated to the others and recycled in further messages and reports.

Rémillard v. Canada (National Revenue) - 2022 FC 338 - 2022-03-16

[44] The Agency then provides a list of the various ties the applicant has with Canada, the United States and Barbados, concluding that he could be a resident of any of these countries, as he split his time fairly equally between them.   [...]  [91] The second passage to which the applicant draws the attention of this Court (Vol 12, p 2192, l 7, to p 2193, l 8) deals with Mr. Gagnon’s response to request T-997-1.   [...]  Of course, the question of whether the Agency should have issued a requirement or obtained a court order will be considered below when I deal with the issue of exhaustion of means.

Frac Shack Inc. v. AFD Petroleum Ltd. - 2017 FC 104 - 2017-01-26

Additionally, he thought that the company was easier to deal with regarding business issues.   [...]  [94] He testified that AFD continues to do manual hot refueling, and that the market for manual hot refueling is still fairly robust.   [...]  2. Adherence to the language of the claims in turn promotes both fairness and predictability.

Corocord Raumnetz GMBH v. Dynamo Industries Inc. - 2016 FC 1369 - 2016-12-14

[23] Mr. David Wagner is a landscape architect with over 36 years of experience and whose work encompasses over 150 projects dealing with recreational parks and playground designs.   [...]  a) faire une déclaration fausse ou trompeuse tendant à discréditer l’entreprise, les produits ou les services d’un concurrent;   [...]  c) faire passer d’autres produits ou services pour ceux qui sont commandés ou demandés;

Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Ratiopharm Inc. - 2010 FC 612 - 2010-06-08

The facts in Servier, supra, similarly to the facts in Merck, supra, deal with an infringement action for an ACE-inhibitor drug used to treat hypertensive patients where the contention was that a class of compounds constituted a single invention.   [...]  The ‘324 Patent deals with all forms of pulmonary hypertension. Step Four: Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?   [...]  [171] The Court concludes that it was self-evident or plain that there was a fair expectation of success that sildenafil would treat pulmonary hypertension based on the prior art, specifically the case studies in Atz et al. and the sheep model in Weimann et al.

Greenwood v. Canada - 2020 FC 119 - 2020-01-23

In many ways, it is an indication of the failure of the internal mechanisms that are established to deal with workplace conflict.   [...]  That these women felt this was necessary is an indication of the failure of the RCMP to effectively deal with their cases.   [...]  (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class,

Joly v. Gadwa - 2019 FC 175 - 2019-02-12

[2] This contempt hearing was bifurcated to deal separately with the issues of contempt and sentencing, as in the circumstances was appropriate given the contempt decision would be reserved and the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in Winnicki v Canada (Human Rights Commission), 2007 FCA 52, per Sexton JA.   [...]  [4] These reasons deal with the appropriate sentence. [5] That said, as a preliminary issue, the Respondents also challenged the Applicants’ standing to address the issue of appropriate sentence based on the fact that this First Nation’s elections in September, 2018, resulted in the Applicant Brenda Joly [Joly], who was   [...]  Therefore the Court found it would be fair and reasonable to impose a fine at the upper end of the range, setting the fine at $4,000.

Selvarajah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 769 - 2014-07-31

The Applicant’s credibility is diminished by the fact that he apparently made no effort to deal with the repeated threats he allegedly received, despite working for an organization that may have been in a position to help.   [...]  The Respondent submits that these were two different pieces of evidence that were each fairly assessed by the Board.   [...]  The Board simply fails to deal with the s. 97(1)(a) aspect of the claim.

Avocats sans frontières Québec v. Lawyers Without Borders, Inc. - 2013 FC 27 - 2013-01-14

(c) Section 6 of the Act deals with when a mark is confusing and the factors to be taken into account in making such a determination.   [...]  (e) Section 16 of the Act deals with who is entitled to register a trade-mark; that person includes one that has used in Canada or made known in Canada in association with wares or services unless at the date on which such person so used it or made it known it was confusing with a trade-mark that had been previously used or  [...]  [44] In paragraph 8 of her affidavit she states that LWOB representatives promote LWOB and its legal services whenever “we are invited to attend at conferences, seminars, career fairs, universities and law firms”, adding that “these promotions include newsletters and the web-site which all prominently feature its trade-mark

Pinto Ponce v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 181 - 2012-02-08

[17] The RPD reviewed the evidence before it and concluded that Bolivia is a multi-party democracy, in which President Evo Morales was elected in 2009 after free and fair elections.   [...]  The applicant has cited a number of recent decisions of this Court where the RPD’s determinations on state protection were overturned because the RPD selectively analyzed or failed to deal with compelling evidence of a state’s inadequate provision of protection: Gilvaja v. Canada (MCI), 2009 FC 598, per Justice O’Keefe at   [...]  para14 Counsel's well-crafted submissions point to a number of failings of the Mexican authorities in dealing with gender violence including a culture of acceptance of the practice even among those who are to enforce the laws against it, a culture of impunity for the abusers and obstacles to protection such as corruption,