7,644 result(s)
-
601.
Edwards v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency) - 2002 FCT 618 - 2002-05-31
Federal Court DecisionsThe applicants first applied by letter dated July 27, 2000 for cancellation or waiver of interest under the Fairness provisions of the Income Tax Act to the First Level Fairness Committee. [...] A report was prepared by Heather Campbell and forwarded to the First Level Fairness Committee for review. [...] The purpose of this legislative provision is to allow Revenue Canada, Taxation, to administer the tax system more fairly, by allowing for the application of common sense in dealing with taxpayers who, because of personal misfortune or circumstances beyond their control, are unable to meet deadlines or comply with rules
-
602.
Doerr v. Bell Canada - 2006 FC 1374 - 2006-11-14
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicant made submissions to the effect that the arbitrator did not deal with all the issues raised in the complaint. [...] The principles of natural justice include the notion of procedural fairness and therefore, proceedings should be conducted so they are fair to all the parties. [...] [34] Framed in this way, it can be seen that some of the issues deal with procedural fairness and natural justice.
-
603.
Natural Waters of Viti, Ltd. v. C.E.O. International Holdings Inc. - 2000-03-30
Federal Court Decisionsc) faire passer d'autres marchandises ou services pour ceux qui sont commandés ou demandés; [...] e) faire un autre acte ou adopter une autre méthode d'affaires contraire aux [...] I do not doubt that a person dealing with the goods of another may have a goodwill in the business of dealing with them.
-
604.
Halford v. Seed Hawk Inc. - 2004 FC 455 - 2004-03-25
Federal Court DecisionsI indicated at that time that I would deal with the matter on the merits. [...] To that extent, there is more justification for saying that the zero till issue is a matter which I overlooked or accidentally omitted to deal with. [...] a) l'objet de la modification est de faire concorder le document avec les questions en litige à l'audience;
-
605.
Harkat (Re) - 2010 FC 1242 - 2010-12-09
Federal Court DecisionsClosed hearings were also held to deal with the classified information on danger. [...] For example, paragraph 83(1)(h) deals with the admissibility of evidence in public and closed hearings. [...] An immigration procedure deals with inadmissibility based on security grounds.
-
606.
Rasolzadeh v. Canada - 2005 FC 919 - 2005-04-13
Federal Court Decisions(d) a class action is the preferable procedure for the fair and efficient resolution of the common questions of law or fact; and [...] (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, [...] (a) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the subclass;
-
607.
Balazs v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 596 - 2012-05-24
Federal Court Decisions[6] First, I intend to deal with the applicants’ argument that they were denied a fair hearing due to the incompetence of their legal counsel at the time, contrary to the principles of natural justice. [...] Absent any evidence of misconduct or prejudice, this Court cannot conclude that the applicants were denied a fair hearing. [...] This finding, further to my above disposition of the natural justice issue, is sufficient to dispose of the present application for judicial review without the necessity of dealing with any other issues raised by the applicants.
-
608.
Trujillo Fernandez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 192 - 2009-02-24
Federal Court Decisionsb. Did the RPD breach the rules of procedural fairness? IV. Analysis [...] Nevertheless, the people at the fiscalia could have made a mistake and accepted to deal with a problem that was not within their "territory". [...] I will accept the document conditionally, and we will deal with it during the hearing.
-
609.
Pusuma v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 1025 - 2012-08-29
Federal Court Decisions[34] The Respondent admits counsel incompetence may breach procedural fairness. [...] [50] Counsel have referred me to a range of decisions from this court that deal with the notice requirement. [...] [52] My view of these cases is that none of them deal directly with the issue that the Applicants assert before me: that notice to the relevant regulatory body will always be enough to satisfy the notice requirement.
-
610.
Lo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 799 - 2007-07-31
Federal Court Decisions[24] The Respondent does not suggest that the IAD has any special expertise in dealing with these issues. [...] [34] For these reasons, I have concluded that the failure to consider the Late Submissions was not a breach of the principles of fairness. [...] [36] The second issue under this heading deals with the evidence of the Applicants’ daughter.
-
611.
Coon v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2016 FC 340 - 2016-03-21
Federal Court Decisionsa. Is the Board’s decision to refuse to grant the applicant day parole or full parole reasonable and procedurally fair? [...] (2) The Board’s decision is reasonable and complies with the rules of procedural fairness [...] He has shown a pattern of dealing ineffectively with stress and making poor decisions when faced with adversity.
-
612.
Ma v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2004 FC 463 - 2004-03-26
Federal Court Decisionsb) il a indiqué par écrit au ministre qu'il a fait ou a l'intention de faire un placement; [...] [51] The Respondent notes that Pinard J. discussed the issue of procedural fairness in this context in Hao, supra: [...] 12. Alternatively, the applicant raises the issue of procedural fairness.
-
613.
Union of Nova Scotia Indians v. Canada (Attorney General) - 1996-10-23
Federal Court DecisionsThe balance of these reasons deals with the two basic issues raised. [...] The unfairness alleged is said to arise in three respects, which I deal with in turn. [...] (c) Fairness and legitimate expectations Finally, in regard to procedural fairness, the applicants contend the doctrine of legitimate expectations is here applicable.
-
614.
Fox Lake Indian Band v. Reid Crowther & Partners Ltd. - 2002 FCT 630 - 2002-05-30
Federal Court DecisionsThese reasons arise out of a fairly complex action, between the two surviving parties to this litigation, on a guarantee. [...] Ultimately it boils down to a consideration of simple fairness, common sense and the interest that the courts have that justice be done. [...] To effectively deal with the amendments the Crown may have further discovery.
-
615.
Reda v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2012 FC 79 - 2012-01-19
Federal Court DecisionsIn the absence of a dispute and given that the two decisions are closely related, I will deal with the arguments related to both decisions. [...] The section states that it shall be “a procedure for fairly and expeditiously resolving offenders’ grievances”. [...] Therefore, in principle, I should exercise my discretion and not deal with the judicial review application.
-
616.
Duverger v. 2553-4330 Québec Inc. (Aéropro) - 2015 FC 1071 - 2015-09-11
Federal Court DecisionsMoreover, the Commission must also decide whether the issue was dealt with fairly at a procedural level. [...] Was the Commission’s decision not to deal with the complaint a possible, acceptable outcome? [...] [34] I will begin by analyzing the Commission’s refusal to deal with the complaint.
-
617.
Letourneau v. Clearbrook Iron Works Ltd. - 2004 FC 1422 - 2004-10-14
Federal Court DecisionsIt is fairly clear that the counsel has the best answer that is available and if he needs more he can always send some other witness out to make an actual measurement. [...] From this I take it that in some circumstances fairly specific questions dealing with the prosecution of the patent may be admissible. [...] This is fairly serious in that the counterclaim puts the allegation into the context of a false and misleading statement.
-
618.
Timberwest Forest Corp. v. Canada - 2007 FC 148 - 2007-02-08
Federal Court DecisionsTimber is considered to be surplus to the needs of B.C. if no fair offers have been received. [...] (c) the offer should be dismissed as it does not represent fair market value; and [...] The plaintiff has not challenged the legislative provisions dealing with the issuance of export permits.
-
619.
Harold v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency) - 2003 FCT 688 - 2003-05-30
Federal Court DecisionsThe purpose of this legislative provision is to allow Revenue Canada, Taxation, to administer the tax system more fairly, by allowing for the application of common sense in dealing with taxpayers who, because of personal misfortune or circumstances beyond their control, are unable to meet deadlines or comply with rules [...] (2) The fairness worksheet prepared by Ms. Maeda; (3) The Applicant's first fairness request letter; [...] (5) The fairness worksheet prepared by Ms. Leib; (6) The Applicant's second fairness request letter and enclosures;
-
620.
Mathias v. Canada - 1997-11-07
Federal Court Decisions[5] It is not the first time that contentious issues are raised in Indian claims proceedings dealing with discovery. [...] On the other hand, Question 136 appears to be a fair question and at that level may be quickly answered by a yes or a no. [...] [13] No doubt, Addy J.'s comments on the scope of discovery lies in the lap of fundamental fairness and an even-playing field.
-
621.
Ahmed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 1157 - 2018-11-16
Federal Court DecisionsThe Respondent argues that in any event, there was no breach of procedural fairness. [...] However, Rule 52 only allows the RAD to “do whatever is necessary to deal with the matter” where there is no provision in the Rules dealing with that matter, i.e. where there is a gap. [...] [...] . . . 52 In the absence of a provision in these Rules dealing with a matter raised during the proceedings, the Division may do whatever is necessary to deal with the matter.
-
622.
Rasa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2000-05-11
Federal Court DecisionsIn the present case, the Court is dealing with a review of the discretionary decisions of a delegate of the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration ("Minister"). [...] (d) The Minister is alleged not to have acted fairly when making her decision under section 53(1)(d) of the Immigration Act. [...] [25] The Convention Against Torture deals only with acts of torture that may be
-
623.
Wagner v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2017 FC 801 - 2017-09-01
Federal Court Decisions[14] General Vance then found this breach of procedural fairness had been remedied. [...] i) A 2(a) release would not deal a permanent, crippling blow to the Applicant’s future success and ability to secure employment; [...] [57] As the Applicant was unsuccessful, I will not deal with whether the remedy he sought would have been appropriate.
-
624.
Bees v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2014 FC 131 - 2014-02-05
Federal Court Decisions[28] I agree with the Respondent that the Applicant should not be allowed to raise this procedural fairness argument. [...] Allowing the Applicant to advance the breach of procedural fairness argument at this late stage would prejudice the Respondent. [...] The Applicant also addresses the jurisdiction of the MPCC to deal with his Second Complaint.
-
625.
Kahin v. Canada (Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) - 2010 FC 247 - 2010-03-03
Federal Court Decisions[11] There are a surprising number of cases dealing with persons employed at airport facilities and security clearance issues. [...] Justice Pinard in Motta at paragraph 13 described the procedural fairness to be afforded in such circumstances as minimal: [...] [13] In the case at bar, we are dealing with a simple application for clearance or a permit made by a person who has no existing right to that clearance or permit and is not accused of anything.