Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20131106


Docket:

IMM-10760-12

 

Citation: 2013 FC 1130

Ottawa, Ontario, November 6, 2013

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan

 

 

BETWEEN:

MATHIJUKAN RAMANATHAN

 

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

[1]               This is a most unusual case. The problem is that the transcript of a May 8, 2012 Refugee Protection Division hearing has gone missing. Therefore, the Certified Tribunal Record is incomplete.

 

[2]               I accept the word of the Applicant’s counsel, as an officer of this Court, that the hearing of May 8, 2012 dealt with the Applicant’s identity – the determinative issue in this case. The Applicant’s credibility was also in issue.

 

[3]               Both matters of identity and credibility were canvassed in the missing transcripts. Therefore, the transcripts are highly relevant.

 

[4]               Given the options of determining the judicial review without the transcript and potentially accepting counsel’s notes as the “best available evidence” and ordering the matter to be reheard, a rehearing is the preferred option. This is not a criticism of counsel or his note-taking abilities.

 

[5]               Therefore, this judicial review will be granted, the decision quashed and the matter referred back to be determined by a different member.

 

[6]               There are no questions for certification.

 

 

 

 

 


JUDGMENT

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is granted, the decision of the Refugee Protection Division is quashed and the matter is to be referred back to be determined by a different member.

 

 

 

 

"Michael L. Phelan"

Judge

 

 


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 


DOCKET:

IMM-10760-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

MATHIJUKAN RAMANATHAN v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

                                                            toronto, ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

                                                            OCTOBER 21, 2013

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT:

                                                            PHELAN J.

DATED:

                                                            november 6, 2013

APPEARANCES:

Robert Blanshay

 

For The Applicant

 

Michael Butterfield

 

For The Respondent

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Blanshay & Lewis

Barristers and Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Applicant

 

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.