Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 


Date: 20120827

Docket: T-1965-11

Citation: 2012 FC 1019

Calgary, Alberta, August 27, 2012

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore

 

BETWEEN:

 

MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

 

Applicant

 

and

 

 

 

ALEJANDRO ARREDONDO

 

 

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

           REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

 

[1]               The finding of inadequate reasons is reason enough to allow an appeal.

 

[2]               The Citizenship Judge did not address the residence requirements necessary for citizenship, nor had the first-instance judge even summarized of what those essential requirements consist.

 

[3]               The three reasons provided in the decision are wholly inadequate and irrelevant to an application for citizenship under the residency requirements. In addition, they are unintelligible as the inherent reasoning of the Citizenship Judge cannot even be determined.

 

[4]               Therefore, the decision is set aside and the matter is remitted to another Citizenship Judge for consideration anew. This is to ensure that the three residency test requirements under the legislation for citizenship are at the very least, considered (paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act, RSC 1985, c H-6).

 

[5]               A decision taken without appropriate analysis and, thus, adequate consideration of legislation cannot be allowed to stand.

 


ORDER

 

THIS COURT ORDERS that the decision be set aside and the matter be remitted to another Citizenship Judge for consideration anew.

 

“Michel M.J. Shore”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                         T-1965-11

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                        MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                            v

                                                            ALEJANDRO ARREDONDO

 

MOTION HELD VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE ON AUGUST 27, 2012 FROM CALGARY, ALBERTA AND EDMONTON, ALBERTA

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER                                   SHORE J.

 

DATED:                                            August 27, 2012

 

 

 

ORAL AND WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

Rick Garvin

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Party did not appear

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Edmonton, Alberta

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Party did not appear

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.