Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

Federal Court

 

Cour fédérale

 

Date: 20101019

Docket: IMM-4707-09

Citation: 2010 FC 1016

Ottawa, Ontario, October 19, 2010

PRESENT:     The Honourable Mr. Justice Zinn

 

 

BETWEEN:

MUTHUKAMARA THIYAGARAJAH

Applicant

and

 

THE MINISTER OF

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

 

[1]               This is an application pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 for judicial review of the decision denying the applicant’s application for permanent resident status based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds (H&C application).  This application was heard with another, Court File IMM-4705-09, in which the applicant challenged the decision made by the same officer on his Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) application.

 

[2]               In my reasons for Judgment issued this date in IMM-4705-09, I stated my agreement with the submission of the applicant that if IMM-4705-09 was allowed on the basis that the officer failed to address the risks alleged by him, then the application in IMM-4707-09 which raised the same risks must also be allowed. 

 

[3]               I allowed the application in IMM- 4705-09 on the basis noted and therefore this application must also be allowed for the reasons given in that file.  A copy of the Reasons for Judgment and Judgment in IMM-4705-09 has been ordered to be placed in this Court File. 

 

[4]               Given the substantial changes in Sri Lanka, the applicant should be given the opportunity to submit new material in his H&C application before it is redetermined.

 

[5]               Neither party proposed a question for certification and no question is certified.


 

JUDGMENT

THIS COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that:

 

1.         This application is allowed, the decision of the officer dated September 2, 2009, is set aside and the applicant’s H&C application is remitted to another officer for determination after the applicant has been given an opportunity to make new submissions; and

 

2.         No question is certified.

 

“Russel W. Zinn”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                          IMM-4707-09

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          MUTHUKAMARA THIYAGARAJAH v.

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

DATE OF HEARING:                      SEPTEMBER 14, 2010

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

AND JUDGMENT BY:                    ZINN J.

 

DATED:                                             OCTOBER 19, 2010

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Micheal Crane

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Bradley Bechard

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Mr.  Micheal Crane

Barrister & Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.