Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Federal Court

Cour fédérale

Date: 20101004

Docket: IMM-1071-10

Citation: 2010 FC 971

[UNREVISED CERTIFIED ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

Ottawa, Ontario, October 4, 2010

PRESENT:     The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard

BETWEEN:

FERENC LAKATOS,

FERENCNE LAKATOS and

SANDOS LAKATOS

 

Applicants

 

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

 

Respondent

 

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

 

[1]          This is an application for judicial review of a decision rendered on January 20, 2010, by a pre‑removal risk assessment officer (PRRA officer). The application was submitted under subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, by Ferenc Lakatos, Ferencné Lakatos and Sandos Lakatos (the applicants). The PRRA officer found that the applicants were not subject to a danger of torture or to a risk of cruel or unusual treatment or punishment or to a risk to their lives if they were to be removed to their country of nationality.

 

[2]          The applicants are citizens of Hungary of Roma ethnicity.

 

[3]          On March 9, 2010, after the decision by the PRRA officer and before their application for leave and judicial review of the decision could be considered, the applicants left Canada for Hungary. These facts were admitted by counsel for the applicants.

 

[4]          Consequently, I am forced to agree with the respondent that this application for judicial review has become moot and must therefore be dismissed. In so doing, I rely on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Perez v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2009 FCA 171, which affirmed the decision of Justice Luc Martineau (2008 FC 663), who, being satisfied that the applicant had left Canada before the application for judicial review of the PRRA decision could be heard by the Court, dismissed the application on the ground that it was moot.

 

[5]          In Villalobo v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2009 FC 773, Justice Michael Kelen, relying on Perez, above, made the same finding (see also the decision of my colleague, James Russell, in Rana v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2010 FC 36).

 

[6]          Accordingly, the application for judicial review is dismissed.

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

            The application for judicial review of the decision rendered on January 20, 2010, by a PRRA officer is dismissed.

 

“Yvon Pinard”

Judge

 

Certified true translation

Catherine Jones, Translator

 

 

 


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                          IMM-1071-10

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          FERENC LAKATOS, FERENCNE LAKATOS and SANDOS LAKATOS v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                    Montréal, Quebec

 

DATE OF HEARING:                      September 15, 2010

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

AND JUDGMENT:                          Pinard J.

 

DATED:                                             October 4, 2010

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Patrizia Ruscio                                    FOR THE APPLICANTS

 

Thi My Dung Tran                               FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Patrizia Ruscio                                                              FOR THE APPLICANTS

Montréal, Quebec

 

Myles J. Kirvan                                                            FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.