|
|
|
|
BETWEEN:
DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] On February 5, 2010, Prothonotary Morneau allowed the respondent’s motion and ordered that the application be struck in it entirety, without leave to amend, with costs.
[2] On May 18, 2010, counsel for the respondent filed a bill of costs and requested that it be assessed without appearance of the parties. On May 21, 2010, a direction was issued, setting a deadline for filing written representations. The parties filed their written representations within the time allowed. I am now ready to proceed with assessing the bill of costs.
[3] In response to the applicant’s written representations regarding the fact that he objects to paying costs, I would like to reiterate that under Rule 400(1) of the Federal Courts Rules, only the Court may allow costs. The assessment officer’s role is to quantify costs once the Court has granted awarded them. Since the Court awarded costs in this case, the assessment officer must assess the costs as requested by the respondent.
[5] I allowed all the counsel fees except item 26, for which I allowed 2 units, since the assessment appears relatively simple to me. The counsel fees are therefore allowed in the amount of $1,300.
[6] Disbursements are allowed in the amount of $386.25. I did not allow the photocopies of the notice of appearance or the service of the notice of appearance by bailiffs, because that document is not in the Tariff B table.
[7] The respondent’s bill of costs submitted at $2,419.70 is allowed and assessed in the amount of $1,686.25. A certificate of assessment will be issued for this amount.
STYLE OF CAUSE: JEAN-FRANÇOIS TURMEL
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING
REASONS OF DIANE PERRIER, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATED: July 30, 2010
|
|
|