Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

Federal Court

 

Cour fédérale

 


 

Date: 20100325

Docket: IMM-1547-10

Ottawa, Ontario, March 25, 2010

PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Shore 

 

BETWEEN:

MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Applicant

and

 

MOHAMED SALL

Respondent

 

ORDER

 

            FOLLOWING the application to this Court to stay the release of the respondent until the application for leave and judicial review of the Immigration Division order is determined;

 

            BASED ON the documents read and the arguments heard by conference call, the Court agrees completely with the applicant’s position;

 

            AS A RESULT OF the risk of danger the respondent poses as shown by the history of his case in the Court of Québec decision dated June 19, 2009 (considered on the basis of sections 244 and 246 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (IRPR) and the jurisprudence, for example, Justice Richard Boivin’s decision in Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Sankar, 2009 FC 934 at paragraph 15), the stay requested by the applicant is granted;

 

            HAVING identified the tripartite test set out in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 86 N.R. 302, and having assessed and weighed each of the three parts, the Court has reached the conclusion that not granting the stay in favour of the applicant would be irresponsible, in light of the Toth test and the consequences of the Court’s assessment of the results of the test;

 

            For all these reasons, the stay requested by the applicant is granted until the application for leave and judicial review is determined.

 

            THE COURT ORDERS that the applicant’s motion is granted, and the Court orders that the respondent’s release is stayed until a decision is issued on the application for leave and judicial review of the Immigration Division order.

 

Michel M.J. Shore

Judge

 

Certified true translation

Mary Jo Egan, LLB

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.