Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Nguyen

Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions
Date 2008-10-15
Neutral citation 2008 FC 1166
File numbers T-669-08

Decision Content

 

Date: 20081015

Docket: T-669-08

Citation: 2008 FC 1166

Toronto, Ontario, October 15, 2008

PRESENT:     The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell

 

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

Applicant

 

and

 

 

 

MINH TUYET NGUYEN

Respondent

 

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

 

[1]               As I agree with Counsel for the Applicant’s argument, dated July 21, 2008, that, because the Citizenship Judge who decided to grant the Respondent citizenship without providing any reasons for so doing, I find that the decision is made in error of law.

 

ORDER

 

            Accordingly, I grant the present Appeal.

 

            Given that this result is due to a failure beyond the Respondent’s control, I recommend that, should the Respondent again apply for citizenship, that her Application be expedited.

 

                                                                                                            “Douglas R. Campbell”

Judge

FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                          T-669-08

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

v. MINH TUYET NGUYEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                      OCTOBER 15, 2008

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                            CAMPBELL J.

 

 

DATED:                                             OCTOBER 15, 2008

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Ned Djordjevic

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

MINH TUYET NGUYEN

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Self-Represented)

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

MINH TUYET NGUYEN

Toronto, Ontario

 

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT (Self-Represented)

 

                                                                                                                     

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.