Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

 

Date: 20060419

 

Docket: T-1337-05

 

Citation: 2006 FC 496

 

Between:

 

CAMILLE WANNA

 

Plaintiff

 

and

 

MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

 

Defendant

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS – REASONS

 

 

MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

 

 

[1]               This is an assessment of the defendant’s costs following the judgment of October 3, 2005 dismissing the action at bar and the order of December 19, 2005 dismissing a motion by the plaintiff for an extension of time.  At the defendant’s request, I issued a schedule directing the parties to make their written submissions.  As I have received no reply, I am prepared to proceed with the assessment of the bills as submitted.

[2]               Apart from item 26, the fees are awarded as requested in the amount of $1,986 for items 5 (14 units), 6 (3 units x 11 min.) and 26 (2 units) of Tariff B.  As the plaintiff has made no submissions, I must assume that the compensation sought is reasonable in the circumstances.  As the bills were assessed simultaneously, I award 2 units under item 26.

[3]               All the disbursements incurred in this case, evidence of which was provided by affidavit, are allowed in the amount of $128.11.

[4]               In conclusion, the defendant’s costs are assessed and allowed in the sum of $2,114.11.  A certificate is issued for that amount.

Montréal, Quebec, April 19, 2006

 

 

“Michelle Lamy”

MICHELLE LAMY

ASSESSMENT OFFICER

 

 

 

 

Certified true translation

François Brunet, LLB, BCL


                                                             FEDERAL COURT

                                                                             

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                                      T-1337-05

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      CAMILLE WANNA v. MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING

 

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT:                        Montréal, Quebec

 

REASONS BY:                                              Michelle Lamy, Assessment Officer

 

DATED:                                                         April 19, 2006

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

 

Anthony Karkar                                               for the plaintiff

Montréal, Quebec

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.                                          for the defendant

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.