Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20220706


Docket: T-64-19

Citation: 2022 FC 997

Ottawa, Ontario, July 6, 2022

PRESENT: Mr. Justice Norris

BETWEEN:

MAHMOUD SHARAFALDIN

Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS

[1] On May 27, 2022, the Court released the Judgment and Reasons in this matter allowing the application for judicial review and granting an order of mandamus: see Sharafaldin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 768. Two issues were kept under reserve pending receipt of further submissions from the parties: (1) whether there are any serious questions of general importance for certification under paragraph 22.2(d) of the Citizenship Act, RSC 1985, c C-29; and (2) costs.

[2] On June 10, 2022, the Court was informed that neither party proposed any questions for certification. I agree that none arise.

[3] On June 30, 2022, the Court was informed that the parties had agreed on an award of costs in favour of the applicant in the lump sum amount of $65,000. Having regard to all of the relevant considerations, including Rule 22 of the Federal Courts Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection Rules, SOR/93-22, I agree that a lump sum award in this amount is appropriate.


SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT IN T-64-19

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that

  1. No question of general importance is stated.

  2. Costs are awarded to the applicant in the lump sum, all-inclusive amount of $65,000.

“John Norris”

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

T-64-19

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

MAHMOUD SHARAFALDIN v THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

HELD BY VIDEOCONFERENCE

 

DATE OF HEARING:

June 10, 2021

 

SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT AND REASONS:

NORRIS J.

 

DATED:

July 6, 2022

APPEARANCES:

Douglas Cannon

For The Applicant

 

Helen Park

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Elgin, Cannon & Associates

Vancouver, British Columbia

 

For The Applicant

 

Attorney General of Canada

Vancouver, British Columbia

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.