Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010430

Docket: IMM-1142-01

Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 415

BETWEEN:

KANG RONG LIU

Applicant

-and-

THE MINISTER OF

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

                    REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

O'KEEFE J.

[1]    This is a motion by the Applicant for an order staying the deportation order issued against him on March 19, 2001 which scheduled his removal for May 1, 2001.

[2]    The Applicant came to Canada in September 1973 with his wife and two children under the conditional entrepreneur category.    His wife went back to Taiwan in 1996 and he is now divorced from his wife.

[3]    His business closed and this is the reason for his deportation.


[4]    Between September 1994 and June 1996 the Applicant attended school to improve his English skills and he received his Ontario Secondary School Diploma.

[5]    The Applicant has two sons who he supports. The oldest son is in second year at the University of Toronto and the younger son will graduate from high school this year.

[6]    The Applicant filed an H & C application on November 1, 2000 and a decision is expected on this application in January or February 2002.

[7]    The Applicant states that his sons need his support both financially and emotionally and as they have no mother in Canada he is their only source of support.

Issue

[8]    Should an order issue staying the Applicant's removal from Canada?

Analysis and Decision

[9]    In order to grant a stay, I must be satisfied that the applicant has met the tri-partite test outlined in Toth v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1988), 6 Imm. L.R. (2d) 123 (F.C.A.). The applicant must meet all three parts of the tri-partite test. Summarized, these parts are:


1.         Has the applicant demonstrated that he has a serious issue to be tried?

2.         Has he demonstrated that he would suffer irreparable harm if the stay order was not granted?

3.         Has he demonstrated that the balance of convenience considering the total situation of both parties favours the order being granted?

Serious Issue

[10]            The Applicant has raised a serious issue and that issue is whether mandamus should issue to order that the H & C application, be completed in this case, prior to the Applicant being removed from Canada. I note that the Applicant has indicated that she may amend her application for judicial review to cover the orders that were issued.

Irreparable Harm

[11]            The Applicant is the sole provider of financial and emotional support for his two sons who are in high school and university. There are no other family members in Canada. The Applicant has no home or employment in Taiwan. The sons have not seen their mother since 1995. I am satisfied that the Applicant would suffer irreparable harm if he was removed from Canada prior to his H & C application being determined. The irreparable harm would be the damage to his family unit during the currency of the school year.


Balance of Convenience

[12]            In this case, the balance of convenience favours the Applicant as the stay would allow him to maintain an intact family unit until his H & C application is determined. The Respondent will not be seriously inconvenienced by an approximate 10 month delay.

[13]            The removal of the Applicant is stayed until his Humanitarian and Compassionate application is decided.

ORDER

[14]            IT IS ORDERED THAT the removal of the Applicant is stayed until his Humanitarian and Compassionate application is decided.

    "John A. O'Keefe"

                                                                                               J.F.C.C.                       

Toronto, Ontario

April 30, 2001


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                                                    IMM-1142-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                         KANG RONG LIU

Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                          MONDAY, APRIL 30, 2001

PLACE OF HEARING:                                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                                           O'KEEFE J.

DATED:                                                            MONDAY, APRIL 30, 2001

APPEARANCES BY:                                     Ms. Nancy Lam

For the Applicant

Ms. Catherine Vasilaros

For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                       Nancy Lam

Barrister & Solicitor

206 Bloor Street West

Suite 3

Toronto, Ontario

M5S 1T8                                                         

For the Applicant

Morris Rosenberg


Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                            Date: 20010430

                                                                                        Docket: IMM-1142-01

Between:

KANG RONG LIU

Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

                                                 

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.