Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

           

                                                                                  Date: 20010629

                                                                            Docket: T-1266-98

                                                       Neutral Citation: 2001 FCT 728

BETWEEN:

        MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                            Applicant

                                                 - and -

                                         SUI YUM TAM

                                                                                        Respondent

                    REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

HENEGHAN J.

[1]    The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration appeals from the decision of Citizenship Judge J.M. Hong dated April 22, 1998. In this decision, the Citizenship Judge approved the Respondent's Application for Canadian Citizenship.


[2]    The Respondent, although served with a Notice of Hearing, did not appear upon the hearing of this appeal.

[3]    The Applicant argues that the Citizenship erred in law in his determination that the Respondent had satisfied the residence requirement pursuant to section 5(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act, 1974-75-76, c. 108. The Citizenship Judge purported to apply the test established by Associate Chief Justice in Re Papadogiorgakis, [1978] 2 F.C. 208 (T.D.).

[4]    The Respondent arrived in Canada on October 23, 1992. Although he was absent from Canada for a total number of 419 days during the four years immediately preceding his application for citizenship, the Citizenship Judge concluded that the Respondent had demonstrated that he had established a residential base in Canada and a centralized mode of living on October 23, 1992.

[5]    The Applicant argues that this conclusion is patently unreasonable having regard to the fact that the Respondent had only arrived in Canada on October 23, 1992.

[6]    I agree.

[7]    The appeal is allowed and the decision of the Citizenship Judge dated April 22, 1998 is quashed.


                                               ORDER

The appeal is allowed and the decision of the Citizenship Judge dated April 22, 1998 is quashed.

"E. Heneghan"

                                                                                               J.F.C.C.                   

OTTAWA, Ontario

June 29, 2001

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.