Federal Court Decisions

                                                                       

Date: 20010726

Docket: IMM-3915-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 835

Toronto, Ontario, Thursday, the 26^th day of July, 2001

PRESENT:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Lemieux

BETWEEN:

ANDRAS ERNO BOROS, ANDRASNE BOROS, KRISZTIAN BALOGH, DOLOREZS BOROS, ANDRAS BOROS, LIVIA BOROS and PETERNE ROZSA

                                                                                            Applicants

                                                 - and -

   THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                          Respondent

                    REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1] I agree with counsel for the Respondent that counsel for the Applicants argued a substantially different case than that identified in their memorandum of fact and law.

[2]    In oral argument, counsel for the Applicants challenged the credibility findings made by the Tribunal something not done in their memorandum. This new tact fundamentally impacted the Respondent's case leaving counsel without any meaningful opportunity to address the Applicants new case which relied heavily on transcript references.

                                               ORDER

This Judicial Review application is adjourned to a date to be fixed by the Judicial Administrator.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.         The Applicants shall serve and file a further memorandum of argument on or before August 7, 2001.

2.         The Respondent shall serve and file a further memorandum of argument on or before August 17, 2001.                                                   

"François Lemieux"

                                                                                               J.F.C.C.                        

Toronto, Ontario

July 26, 2001

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                                                    IMM-3915-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                         ANDRAS ERNO BOROS, ANDRASNE BOROS, KRISZTIAN BALOGH, DOLOREZS BOROS, ANDRAS BOROS, LIVIA BOROS and PETERNE ROZSA

                                                                                                                          Applicants

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                        Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                          WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 2001

PLACE OF HEARING:                                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDERBY:                                             LEMIEUX J.    

DATED:                                                            THURSDAY, JULY 26, 2001

APPEARANCES:                                           Mr. Rocco Galati

For the Applicants

Mr. Kevin Lunney

                                                            For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                       Galati, Rodrigues & Associates

Barristers & Solicitors

203-637 College St.

Toronto, Ontario

M6G 1B5

For the Applicants

                                                                                                                                         

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                            Date: 20010726

                                                                                        Docket: IMM-3915-00

Between:

ANDRAS ERNO BOROS, ANDRASNE BOROS, KRISZTIAN BALOGH, DOLOREZS BOROS, ANDRAS BOROS, LIVIA BOROS and PETERNE ROZSA

                                                                                                                          Applicants

                                                                - and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                 

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER