Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                       

Date: 20010410

Docket: IMM-1817-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 313

BETWEEN:

VLADISLAV PRIKULS

                                                                                                                                  Applicant

                                                                       

                                                                   - and -

                     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                              Respondent

                                                  REASONS FOR ORDER

McKEOWN J.:

[1]                The Applicant seeks judicial review of a visa officer's decision dated March 20, 2000, denying his application for permanent residence.


[2]                The issue is whether the Applicant was provided procedural fairness in not being given advance notice of the visa officer's requirements concerning employment requirements of the NOC category of Physiotherapist (NOC# 3142). The Applicant stated that he was not aware of the need to show that his credentials were equivalent to those required under NOC, nor that he had to show that he was eligible to write the Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators (CAPR) exams.

[3]                However, the Applicant's consultant had raised both of these points in his March 19, 1999 application letter sent to the Canadian Consulate General, Buffalo, which is found at page 84 of the certified record. On the third page of that letter, the Applicant's consultant wrote:

Mr. Prikuls has already contacted Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators when he was in Canada in November, 1998. He understands that in order to practice physiotherapy in Canada he, as a person educated outside Canada, must have his credentials reviewed by the Alliance and be eligible for the Physiotherapy National Examination (PNE).

[4]    Furthermore, the subject was raised by the visa officer as shown in the CAIPS notes and the Applicant was very evasive with respect to his answers concerning his contact with CAPR.

[5]    Under these circumstances, there is no violation of procedural fairness by the visa officer. The Applicant knew his credentials had to be evaluated and that he needed to show he had the right to sit the PNE.


[6]                The application for judicial review is dismissed.

"W.P. McKeown"

                                                                                               J.F.C.C.                        

Toronto, Ontario

April 10, 2001                                      


                         FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                  Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                                                    IMM-1817-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                         VLADISLAV PRIKULS

                                                                                              Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                          Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                          TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2001

PLACE OF HEARING:                                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                         McKEOWN J.

DATED:                                                            TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2001

APPEARANCES BY:                                     Mr. Harvey Savage

For the Applicant

Ms. Neeta Logsetty

For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                       HARVEY SAVAGE

Barrister & Solicitor

393 University Avenue, Suite 2000

Toronto, Ontario

M5G 1E6

For the Applicant

                                 

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent



FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

            Date: 20010410

          Docket: IMM-1817-00

BETWEEN:

VLADISLAV PRIKULS

                                            Applicant

- and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                        Respondent

                                                 

REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.