Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020627

Docket: IMM-3753-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 722

Toronto, Ontario, Thursday, the 27th day of June, 2002

PRESENT:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell

BETWEEN:

   THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                     Applicant

                                                    - and -

                                           JOZSEF MEZEI

                                                                                                 Respondent

                     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]    This is an application for judicial review by the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (the "Applicant") of a decision of the Convention Refugee Determination Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the "CRDD"), dated July 18, 2001, wherein the CRDD determined that the Respondent is a Convention refugee.


[2]    The Respondent is a citizen of Hungary who based his Convention refugee claim on the ground of membership in a particular social group, the Roma ethnic minority in Hungary. The CRDD found that in the Respondent's particular circumstances the discrimination Roma Hungarians typically face on a cumulative level constitutes persecution. The personal circumstances which were taken into account in reaching the decision included the Respondent's psychological condition which arose because of a series of traumatic and stressful incidents of harassment and discrimination throughout his youth. This condition was verified by a psychologist's report submitted to the CRDD in support of the Respondent's claim.

[3]    The CRDD also considered the availability of state protection in the Respondent's case. Although the CRDD concluded that state protection is generally available for the Roma in Hungary, it concluded that in the Respondent's particular circumstances it would be unreasonable to expect him to approach the police for protection. The Respondent's psychological vulnerability, the evidence of incidents of persecution where the police were the agents of persecution, and the Respondent's previous unfruitful attempts to access protection from various organizations were factors considered by the CRDD in reaching this conclusion.

[4]    The Applicant brings this judicial review to challenge the CRDD's decision. The Applicant submits that the CRDD committed various errors of law and fact in its assessment of the availability of state protection. The Respondent submits that the CRDD properly analysed the availability of state protection for the particular claimant. I accept the Respondent's position.


[5]                 In my opinion, there was ample evidence before the CRDD, including the documentary evidence regarding the general availability of state protection to Roma Hungarians, and the Respondent's medical condition and history of persecution, to support its finding that state protection was not reasonably available in this case. The CRDD's decision is specific and narrowed to the particular circumstances of the Respondent. The Applicant has failed to demonstrate that the CRDD committed a reviewable error, either in law or in fact. I find that on the facts of this case, the CRDD's decision was reasonably supported by the evidence before it.

   

                                                  ORDER

1. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

           "Douglas R. Campbell"

line

Judge

            

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record                                                                                                  

COURT NO:                              IMM-3753-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                       THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Applicant

- and -

JOZSEF MEZEI

Respondent

                                                                                   

DATE OF HEARING:              THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 2002

PLACE OF HEARING:              TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                         CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                          THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 2002

APPEARANCES:                         Mr. Jamie Todd

For the Applicant

Mr. Peter G. Ivanyi

                                For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:       Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Applicant

                                                                   

Richon Genova

Barristers & Solicitors

                                                                           121 Richmond Street West,

Suite 903

                                                                           Toronto, Ontario

                                                                           M5H 2K1

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Date: 20020627

                                   Docket:IMM-3753-01

Between:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Applicant

- and -

JOZSEF MEZEI

Respondent

                                                   

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                   

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.