Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19990407


Docket: IMM-4333-98

SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, Wednesday, this 7th day of April, 1999.

PRESENT:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL

BETWEEN:

     OTTO BRUKKER, JOZSEF BRUKKER,

     and GYULA RUDOLF BAUER,

     Applicants,

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent.

     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

CAMPBELL J.

[1]      Within the evidence produced on behalf of the applicants in this case, two agents of persecution are clearly identified: local Romanian police and the SRI (Romanian Intelligence Service). In its decision, the CRDD only made an Internal Flight Alternative (IFA) finding with respect to the former. I find that to fail to consider an IFA with respect to the latter constitutes a reviewable error as the decision was made without regard for the evidence.

[2]      Accordingly, I set the CRDD decision aside and refer this matter back to a newly constituted panel for reconsideration. As the reviewable error in this case was caused by imprecise decision making, I find special reasons to award costs to the applicants, and, thus, I hereby award costs to them jointly as if they are a single party.

[3]      To assist in the reconsideration, I find it necessary to make some observations about the CRDD's decision reviewed in this application.

[4]      In the decision no concrete findings of credibility were made with respect to any of the claimants. Instead, the decision cites "allegations" made by the claimants and, on the apparent assumption that these allegations are true, findings are made about the localized nature of persecution by police only. The problem is that the evidence of the claimants also contained allegations of persecution by the SRI. The persecution by the SRI was not mentioned in the decision. Without a clear finding of credibility it is impossible to conclude whether this evidence was accepted or rejected. Such a finding is essential to the consideration of an IFA because the agents of persecution must be identified to know whether an IFA exists. As I have found, failure to do so constitutes a reviewable error.

     "Douglas Campbell"

     Judge

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

April 7, 1999

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:                  IMM-4333-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:              Otto Brukker, Jozsef Brukker, and Gyula Rudolf Bauer v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

PLACE OF HEARING:              Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

DATE OF HEARING:              April 7, 1999

REASONS FOR ORDER                 

OF THE COURT:                   The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell

                        

                        

DATED:                      April 7, 1999

APPEARANCES

Felix Hoehn      for the Applicants

Glennys Bembridge

Dept. of Justice

7th floor, 229 - 4th Avenue South

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan      for the Respondent

S7K 4K3

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

Henderson Campbell

Barristers & Solicitors

202 - 135 - 21st Street East

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

S7K 0B4

     for the Applicants

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada      for the Respondent

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.